CUTTING EDEMA ATTACKS WITH THE PATHOGENETIC THERAPY IN CHILDREN WITH HEREDITARY ANGIOEDEMA

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency (HAE-C1-INH) is a rare (orphan) autosomal-dominant disease related to primary immunodeficiencies with a defect in the complement system and is characterized by recurrent, unpredictable edema attacks involving various organs and tissues. The recurrent episodes of edema are not amenable to the usual therapy methods and often are life-threatening conditions, especially in pediatric patients. The most pressing issue for the attending physician is the choice of the drug from the available range, taking into consideration its mechanism of action, route of administration and other parameters. This Article summarizes the properties of drugs currently available for the HAE attacks relief in pediatric patients in Russia, including the results of clinical trials, and the Authors’ own experience in the use of Icatibant and a human C1-esterase inhibitor as drugs of choice for the edema relief in the pediatric patient cohort. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the equivalence and safety of Icatibant and a C1-inhibitor concentrate for the edema management. Materials and methods used: the study included 34 HAE-C1-INH patients who had experienced 302 attack episodes in total. The inclusion criteria were a registered episode of angioedema in a patient aged 0 up to 18 y/o, confirmed HAE diagnosis and one of the two studying drugs intake within 24 hours after the onset of the first edema symptoms. Patients were administered with Icatibant, subcutaneously, or with C1-esterase inhibitor, intravenously. The efficacy was evaluated by comparing the presence of relief and/or relief of symptoms during the mentioned therapy. All of the adverse reactions during the therapy were also recorded in order to assess the drugs’ safety. Results: a total of 302 attack episodes were analyzed in 34 patients in the period from 2016 to 2021. Icatibant was used in 225 (74.5%) cases in 34 patients, and human C1-esterase inhibitor was used in 77 (25.5%) cases in 27 patients. It was allowed to use both drugs in the same patient in different angioedema episodes. The age of the children included in the analysis at the time of the first episode ranged from 1 to 14 y/o (Me 4.5 y/o). The edema was peripheral in most of the studied cases. The drugs were found to be equivalent in terms of duration until the edema symptoms’ relief (Me duration was 30 min. in both drugs, p=0.005), but not in terms of duration until the symptoms cut-off, - with greater values for Icatibant compared to the C1-inhibitor human esterase (p=0.394). Conclusion: a relatively similar efficacy and safety of both drugs as well as the possibility for their use in all age groups were recorded. It is therefore necessary to take into consideration the availability of the satisfactory venous access when choosing a drug for stopping the edema; the patient’s age (in order to ensure the fastest possible administration of the drug counting from the onset of edema); the remoteness of a patient’s location during the attack from the nearest available and satisfying medical facility; the patient’s and/or his/her parent(s)/caretaker(s) preferences. The study demonstrated that both Icatibant and the C1-inhibitor concentrate have high safety profile.