我们必须亲亲,才能获得自由:对乌龟岛#nobanonstolenland的反思

Melanie K. Yazzie
{"title":"我们必须亲亲,才能获得自由:对乌龟岛#nobanonstolenland的反思","authors":"Melanie K. Yazzie","doi":"10.1080/0966369x.2022.2102586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, I ask, how can we draw from acts and forms of kinship to strengthen our dreams of being free? Looking at a specific example of Indigenous political intervention that occurred in January 2017 during the airport protests against President Donald Trump’s Muslim ban, I explore the political and analytical possibilities of feminist relationality, particularly relations of care, reciprocity, and abundance, for articulating a practice of accountability that is often erased or elided in comfort feminism. These relations of caretaking are at the center of abolitionist and decolonial projects, particularly those espoused by radical Black and Indigenous feminists. I bring Indigenous and Black feminist traditions of relationality together to explore how politicized kinship unsettles comfort feminism and draw from the decolonial and abolition geographies of these two traditions to chart a different path of relationality, one not overdetermined by relations of abandonment, harm, and scarcity that drive the carceral regimes of capitalism and colonialism.","PeriodicalId":12513,"journal":{"name":"Gender, Place & Culture","volume":" 19","pages":"596 - 604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"We must make kin to get free: reflections on #nobanonstolenland in Turtle Island\",\"authors\":\"Melanie K. Yazzie\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0966369x.2022.2102586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this article, I ask, how can we draw from acts and forms of kinship to strengthen our dreams of being free? Looking at a specific example of Indigenous political intervention that occurred in January 2017 during the airport protests against President Donald Trump’s Muslim ban, I explore the political and analytical possibilities of feminist relationality, particularly relations of care, reciprocity, and abundance, for articulating a practice of accountability that is often erased or elided in comfort feminism. These relations of caretaking are at the center of abolitionist and decolonial projects, particularly those espoused by radical Black and Indigenous feminists. I bring Indigenous and Black feminist traditions of relationality together to explore how politicized kinship unsettles comfort feminism and draw from the decolonial and abolition geographies of these two traditions to chart a different path of relationality, one not overdetermined by relations of abandonment, harm, and scarcity that drive the carceral regimes of capitalism and colonialism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender, Place & Culture\",\"volume\":\" 19\",\"pages\":\"596 - 604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender, Place & Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2022.2102586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender, Place & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2022.2102586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这篇文章中,我想问,我们如何从亲属关系的行为和形式中汲取教训,以加强我们自由的梦想?以2017年1月发生在机场抗议唐纳德·特朗普总统穆斯林禁令期间的土著政治干预的具体例子为例,我探讨了女权主义关系的政治和分析可能性,特别是关怀、互惠和丰富的关系,以阐明在安慰女权主义中经常被抹去或忽略的责任实践。这些照料关系是废奴主义者和非殖民化项目的核心,尤其是那些激进的黑人和土著女权主义者所支持的项目。我将土著和黑人女权主义的关系传统结合在一起,探索政治化的亲属关系是如何扰乱舒适的女权主义的,并从这两种传统的去殖民和废殖地理中汲取教训,绘制出一条不同的关系之路,一条不被抛弃、伤害和稀缺的关系所过度决定的道路,这些关系推动了资本主义和殖民主义的专制政权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
We must make kin to get free: reflections on #nobanonstolenland in Turtle Island
Abstract In this article, I ask, how can we draw from acts and forms of kinship to strengthen our dreams of being free? Looking at a specific example of Indigenous political intervention that occurred in January 2017 during the airport protests against President Donald Trump’s Muslim ban, I explore the political and analytical possibilities of feminist relationality, particularly relations of care, reciprocity, and abundance, for articulating a practice of accountability that is often erased or elided in comfort feminism. These relations of caretaking are at the center of abolitionist and decolonial projects, particularly those espoused by radical Black and Indigenous feminists. I bring Indigenous and Black feminist traditions of relationality together to explore how politicized kinship unsettles comfort feminism and draw from the decolonial and abolition geographies of these two traditions to chart a different path of relationality, one not overdetermined by relations of abandonment, harm, and scarcity that drive the carceral regimes of capitalism and colonialism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Closedness and openness in Tehran; a feminist critique of Sennett Gendering the BRI: a viewpoint The gendered body during Covid-19: views from Australia, the United Kingdom, and Japan - Introduction to themed section (Re)making live-in or live-out choice: the lived experience of Filipina migrant domestic workers in Macao Gendered experiences during COVID-19 in Turkey and the meaning of home
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1