基于纽曼性别分析的数学错误分析

R. Agustin
{"title":"基于纽曼性别分析的数学错误分析","authors":"R. Agustin","doi":"10.33503/PRISMATIKA.V1I2.428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Difficulties in learning are caused by student study programs in mathematics education to solve problems in solving mathematics. The mistake was made by both male and female students. In the course, algebraic structure is one of the material that requires the right procedure in its completion. This research includes descriptive analysis with qualitative data analysis. Data collection was carried out by test and interview methods conducted twice, namely TPM 1 and TPM 2. Subjects were considered as 2 students from 35 students of class 2016, consisting of one male student and one female student. The student has high mathematical skills. Each research subject was interviewed regarding the results of his work at TPM 1. To find the credibility of the data, the second test was conducted, which means that this study uses time triangulation. Furthermore, the data were analyzed to determine the types of student errors according to Newman's analysis. Based on the results of the study, data obtained that all research subjects did not make mistakes, errors, errors and answer errors. However, all research subjects made a mistake in the process at TPM 1 or at TPM 2. The male student subject made a mistake because he did not know the right way to use the existing formula. Meanwhile, female student subjects made mistakes because they did not understand the concept of exponents and chaos amid mathematical operations.","PeriodicalId":20523,"journal":{"name":"PRISMATIKA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Riset Matematika","volume":"135 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS KESALAHAN MAHASISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN ANALISIS NEWMAN DITINJAU DARI GENDER\",\"authors\":\"R. Agustin\",\"doi\":\"10.33503/PRISMATIKA.V1I2.428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Difficulties in learning are caused by student study programs in mathematics education to solve problems in solving mathematics. The mistake was made by both male and female students. In the course, algebraic structure is one of the material that requires the right procedure in its completion. This research includes descriptive analysis with qualitative data analysis. Data collection was carried out by test and interview methods conducted twice, namely TPM 1 and TPM 2. Subjects were considered as 2 students from 35 students of class 2016, consisting of one male student and one female student. The student has high mathematical skills. Each research subject was interviewed regarding the results of his work at TPM 1. To find the credibility of the data, the second test was conducted, which means that this study uses time triangulation. Furthermore, the data were analyzed to determine the types of student errors according to Newman's analysis. Based on the results of the study, data obtained that all research subjects did not make mistakes, errors, errors and answer errors. However, all research subjects made a mistake in the process at TPM 1 or at TPM 2. The male student subject made a mistake because he did not know the right way to use the existing formula. Meanwhile, female student subjects made mistakes because they did not understand the concept of exponents and chaos amid mathematical operations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRISMATIKA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Riset Matematika\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRISMATIKA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Riset Matematika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33503/PRISMATIKA.V1I2.428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRISMATIKA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Riset Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33503/PRISMATIKA.V1I2.428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学习困难是学生在数学教育中为解决数学问题而制定的学习计划所造成的。男女学生都犯了这个错误。在这门课程中,代数结构是需要正确完成程序的材料之一。本研究包括描述性分析和定性数据分析。数据收集采用测试和访谈的方法,分别进行两次TPM 1和TPM 2。研究对象为2016级35名学生中的2名,男1名,女1名。这个学生有很高的数学技能。每个研究对象都接受了关于他在TPM 1的工作结果的采访。为了找到数据的可信度,我们进行了第二次检验,这意味着本研究使用了时间三角测量。此外,根据Newman的分析,对数据进行分析,以确定学生错误的类型。根据研究结果,获得的数据表明,所有的研究对象没有犯错误,错误,错误和回答错误。然而,所有的研究对象在TPM 1或TPM 2的过程中都犯了错误。男学生被试犯了一个错误,因为他不知道如何正确使用现有的公式。同时,女学生科目由于不理解指数的概念和数学运算中的混乱而出现错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANALISIS KESALAHAN MAHASISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN ANALISIS NEWMAN DITINJAU DARI GENDER
Difficulties in learning are caused by student study programs in mathematics education to solve problems in solving mathematics. The mistake was made by both male and female students. In the course, algebraic structure is one of the material that requires the right procedure in its completion. This research includes descriptive analysis with qualitative data analysis. Data collection was carried out by test and interview methods conducted twice, namely TPM 1 and TPM 2. Subjects were considered as 2 students from 35 students of class 2016, consisting of one male student and one female student. The student has high mathematical skills. Each research subject was interviewed regarding the results of his work at TPM 1. To find the credibility of the data, the second test was conducted, which means that this study uses time triangulation. Furthermore, the data were analyzed to determine the types of student errors according to Newman's analysis. Based on the results of the study, data obtained that all research subjects did not make mistakes, errors, errors and answer errors. However, all research subjects made a mistake in the process at TPM 1 or at TPM 2. The male student subject made a mistake because he did not know the right way to use the existing formula. Meanwhile, female student subjects made mistakes because they did not understand the concept of exponents and chaos amid mathematical operations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
STUDI ETNOMATEMATIKA GARIS DAN SUDUT PADA MOTIF SENI RUMAH BUDAYA SUMBA PENGEMBANGAN LIVEWORKSHEETS INTERAKTIF UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA PENGEMBANGAN MEDIA ULAR TANGGA DENGAN MODEL REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION PADA PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR GEOMETRI DALAM PERMAINAN LATO-LATO ANALISIS PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DENGAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH BERBANTUAN KOMIK LITERASI NUMERASI DAN ETNOMATEMATIKA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1