经尿道膀胱肿瘤显微完全原发切除术后再次切除的结果

M. Eliseu, Vera Marques, H. Antunes, M. Lourenço, E. Tavares-da-Silva, P. Temido, A. Figueiredo
{"title":"经尿道膀胱肿瘤显微完全原发切除术后再次切除的结果","authors":"M. Eliseu, Vera Marques, H. Antunes, M. Lourenço, E. Tavares-da-Silva, P. Temido, A. Figueiredo","doi":"10.24915/aup.37.1-2.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nIntroduction: Non-muscle invasive (NMI) bladder cancers (BC) account for 75% of BC cases, and most are initially diagnosed and treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB). After primary TURB, a repeat resection (rTURB) should be carried out in cases of incomplete resection; however, rTURB is recommended by EAU guidelines in pT1 tumors even when the completeness of the original resection is believed by the surgeon, with reported rates of residual tumor in up to 33%-55% and upstaging in up to 25%. Since the quality of initial resection impacts in the result of a rTURB, these rates are largely dependent on the primary treatment and accurate prediction of completeness, with a probable high variability between surgeons and Centres.\nOur objectives to determine whether rTURB after initial perceived complete resection would frequently identify residual tumor and if this procedure would improve outcomes in NMIBC patients.\nMethods: Patients submitted to TURB from 2015 to 2017 were analysed, identifying which underwent rTURB after initial resection without follow-up cystoscopy in between. Primary perception of completeness, stage and grade were correlated with the eventual presence, stage and grade of residual tumor.\nResults: We analyzed 546 TURB procedures; of these, 275 (50.4%) were for primary bladder cancer. pT1 lesions were found in 85 (30.9%) of primary TURBs; 12 of these were selected for rTURB due to incomplete resection. Of the remaining 73 macros- copically completely resected primary pT1 tumors, 26 (30.6%) underwent elective rTURB.\nRepeat TURB after complete resection of primary pT1 tumors yielded residual tumor in 11.5% of patients (n= 3). All patients with residual tumor had primary pT1 high grade lesions; no upstaging or upgrading was observed. Patients had similar recurrence rates at 1-year regardless of rTURB.\nDiscussion/Conclusion: Standard practice in primary TURB pro- cedures varies across surgeons and centers and will reflect on residual tumor rates. Indications for rTURB might not be suitable for all patients, and single Centre results should be taken in consideration when selecting patients for rTURB.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":100020,"journal":{"name":"Acta Urológica Portuguesa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection\",\"authors\":\"M. Eliseu, Vera Marques, H. Antunes, M. Lourenço, E. Tavares-da-Silva, P. Temido, A. Figueiredo\",\"doi\":\"10.24915/aup.37.1-2.147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\n\\nIntroduction: Non-muscle invasive (NMI) bladder cancers (BC) account for 75% of BC cases, and most are initially diagnosed and treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB). After primary TURB, a repeat resection (rTURB) should be carried out in cases of incomplete resection; however, rTURB is recommended by EAU guidelines in pT1 tumors even when the completeness of the original resection is believed by the surgeon, with reported rates of residual tumor in up to 33%-55% and upstaging in up to 25%. Since the quality of initial resection impacts in the result of a rTURB, these rates are largely dependent on the primary treatment and accurate prediction of completeness, with a probable high variability between surgeons and Centres.\\nOur objectives to determine whether rTURB after initial perceived complete resection would frequently identify residual tumor and if this procedure would improve outcomes in NMIBC patients.\\nMethods: Patients submitted to TURB from 2015 to 2017 were analysed, identifying which underwent rTURB after initial resection without follow-up cystoscopy in between. Primary perception of completeness, stage and grade were correlated with the eventual presence, stage and grade of residual tumor.\\nResults: We analyzed 546 TURB procedures; of these, 275 (50.4%) were for primary bladder cancer. pT1 lesions were found in 85 (30.9%) of primary TURBs; 12 of these were selected for rTURB due to incomplete resection. Of the remaining 73 macros- copically completely resected primary pT1 tumors, 26 (30.6%) underwent elective rTURB.\\nRepeat TURB after complete resection of primary pT1 tumors yielded residual tumor in 11.5% of patients (n= 3). All patients with residual tumor had primary pT1 high grade lesions; no upstaging or upgrading was observed. Patients had similar recurrence rates at 1-year regardless of rTURB.\\nDiscussion/Conclusion: Standard practice in primary TURB pro- cedures varies across surgeons and centers and will reflect on residual tumor rates. Indications for rTURB might not be suitable for all patients, and single Centre results should be taken in consideration when selecting patients for rTURB.\\n\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":100020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Urológica Portuguesa\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Urológica Portuguesa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.37.1-2.147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Urológica Portuguesa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.37.1-2.147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非肌肉侵袭性(NMI)膀胱癌(BC)占BC病例的75%,大多数最初诊断和治疗采用经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURB)。原发性TURB后,如果切除不完全,应进行重复切除(rTURB);然而,对于pT1肿瘤,即使外科医生认为原始切除完全,EAU指南也推荐rTURB,据报道残余肿瘤率高达33%-55%,晚期肿瘤率高达25%。由于初始切除的质量影响rTURB的结果,这些比率在很大程度上取决于最初的治疗和对完全性的准确预测,外科医生和中心之间可能存在很大的差异。我们的目的是确定在最初认为完全切除后的rTURB是否能经常识别残余肿瘤,以及该手术是否能改善NMIBC患者的预后。方法:对2015年至2017年接受TURB的患者进行分析,确定哪些患者在首次切除后没有随访膀胱镜检查。初步感觉的完整性、分期和分级与最终残余肿瘤的存在、分期和分级相关。结果:我们分析了546例TURB手术;其中275例(50.4%)为原发性膀胱癌。原发性turb中有85例(30.9%)存在pT1病变;其中12例因切除不完全而选择rTURB。在其余73例宏观完全切除的原发性pT1肿瘤中,26例(30.6%)行选择性rTURB。11.5%的患者(n= 3)在完全切除原发pT1肿瘤后再次行TURB手术,发现肿瘤残留。所有有肿瘤残留的患者均为原发pT1高分级病变;没有观察到占上风或升级。无论rTURB情况如何,患者在1年的复发率相似。讨论/结论:原发性TURB手术的标准做法因外科医生和中心而异,并将反映残余肿瘤率。rTURB的适应症可能不适合所有患者,在选择rTURB患者时应考虑单个中心的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection
Introduction: Non-muscle invasive (NMI) bladder cancers (BC) account for 75% of BC cases, and most are initially diagnosed and treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB). After primary TURB, a repeat resection (rTURB) should be carried out in cases of incomplete resection; however, rTURB is recommended by EAU guidelines in pT1 tumors even when the completeness of the original resection is believed by the surgeon, with reported rates of residual tumor in up to 33%-55% and upstaging in up to 25%. Since the quality of initial resection impacts in the result of a rTURB, these rates are largely dependent on the primary treatment and accurate prediction of completeness, with a probable high variability between surgeons and Centres. Our objectives to determine whether rTURB after initial perceived complete resection would frequently identify residual tumor and if this procedure would improve outcomes in NMIBC patients. Methods: Patients submitted to TURB from 2015 to 2017 were analysed, identifying which underwent rTURB after initial resection without follow-up cystoscopy in between. Primary perception of completeness, stage and grade were correlated with the eventual presence, stage and grade of residual tumor. Results: We analyzed 546 TURB procedures; of these, 275 (50.4%) were for primary bladder cancer. pT1 lesions were found in 85 (30.9%) of primary TURBs; 12 of these were selected for rTURB due to incomplete resection. Of the remaining 73 macros- copically completely resected primary pT1 tumors, 26 (30.6%) underwent elective rTURB. Repeat TURB after complete resection of primary pT1 tumors yielded residual tumor in 11.5% of patients (n= 3). All patients with residual tumor had primary pT1 high grade lesions; no upstaging or upgrading was observed. Patients had similar recurrence rates at 1-year regardless of rTURB. Discussion/Conclusion: Standard practice in primary TURB pro- cedures varies across surgeons and centers and will reflect on residual tumor rates. Indications for rTURB might not be suitable for all patients, and single Centre results should be taken in consideration when selecting patients for rTURB.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cistectomia Radical com Neobexiga Ortotópica de Studer Assistida por Robot com Preservação de Órgãos Pélvicos The High Resolution MASS spectrometry in Personalised Medicine: Retinol-Binding Protein 4 as a Candidate Biomarker Predictor of Progression in Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma Traumatismo Renal: Análise Retrospetiva de 5 Anos de um Centro de Trauma de Nível 1 Evaluation of Long-Term Sexual Satisfaction in Women Submitted to Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: Retrospective Tertiary Center Study Trexit: A “Clean” Withdrawal from Transrectal Prostate Biopsies – Prospective Results of In-office Freehand Transperineal Biopsies Under Local Anaesthesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1