价值观在未来情景中的作用:什么样的价值观支撑着(非)可持续和(非)公正的未来?

IF 6.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101343
Zuzana V. Harmáčková , Yuki Yoshida , Nadia Sitas , Lelani Mannetti , Adrian Martin , Ritesh Kumar , Marta Berbés-Blázquez , Rebecca Collins , Klaus Eisenack , Ellen Guimaraes , María Heras , Valerie Nelson , Aidin Niamir , Federica Ravera , Isabel Ruiz-Mallén , Patrick O’Farrell
{"title":"价值观在未来情景中的作用:什么样的价值观支撑着(非)可持续和(非)公正的未来?","authors":"Zuzana V. Harmáčková ,&nbsp;Yuki Yoshida ,&nbsp;Nadia Sitas ,&nbsp;Lelani Mannetti ,&nbsp;Adrian Martin ,&nbsp;Ritesh Kumar ,&nbsp;Marta Berbés-Blázquez ,&nbsp;Rebecca Collins ,&nbsp;Klaus Eisenack ,&nbsp;Ellen Guimaraes ,&nbsp;María Heras ,&nbsp;Valerie Nelson ,&nbsp;Aidin Niamir ,&nbsp;Federica Ravera ,&nbsp;Isabel Ruiz-Mallén ,&nbsp;Patrick O’Farrell","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Values have been recognized as critical leverage points for sustainability transformations. However, there is limited evidence unpacking which types of values are associated with specific types of sustainable and unsustainable futures, as described by future scenarios and other types of futures-related works. This paper builds on a review of 460 future scenarios, visions, and other types of futures-related works in the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Values Assessment, synthesizing evidence from academia, private sector, governmental and non-governmental strategies, science-policy reports, and arts-based evidence, to identify the types of values of nature that underlie different archetypes of the future. The results demonstrate that futures related to dystopian scenario archetypes such as Regional Competition, Inequality, and Breakdown are mostly underpinned by deeply individualistic and materialistic values. In contrast, futures with more sustainable and just outcomes, such as Global Sustainable Development and Regional Sustainability, tend to be underpinned by a more balanced combination of plural values of nature, with a dominant focus on nature’s contribution to societal (as opposed to individual) aspects of well-being. Furthermore, the paper identifies research gaps and illustrates the key importance of acknowledging not only people’s specific values directly related to nature, such as instrumental, intrinsic, and relational human-nature values and relationships, but also broad values and worldviews that affect the interactions between nature and society, with resulting impacts on Nature's Contributions to People and opportunities for a good quality of life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 101343"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523000908/pdfft?md5=208fadea4d7a9e38e34f594ba7636239&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343523000908-main.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of values in future scenarios: what types of values underpin (un)sustainable and (un)just futures?\",\"authors\":\"Zuzana V. Harmáčková ,&nbsp;Yuki Yoshida ,&nbsp;Nadia Sitas ,&nbsp;Lelani Mannetti ,&nbsp;Adrian Martin ,&nbsp;Ritesh Kumar ,&nbsp;Marta Berbés-Blázquez ,&nbsp;Rebecca Collins ,&nbsp;Klaus Eisenack ,&nbsp;Ellen Guimaraes ,&nbsp;María Heras ,&nbsp;Valerie Nelson ,&nbsp;Aidin Niamir ,&nbsp;Federica Ravera ,&nbsp;Isabel Ruiz-Mallén ,&nbsp;Patrick O’Farrell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Values have been recognized as critical leverage points for sustainability transformations. However, there is limited evidence unpacking which types of values are associated with specific types of sustainable and unsustainable futures, as described by future scenarios and other types of futures-related works. This paper builds on a review of 460 future scenarios, visions, and other types of futures-related works in the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Values Assessment, synthesizing evidence from academia, private sector, governmental and non-governmental strategies, science-policy reports, and arts-based evidence, to identify the types of values of nature that underlie different archetypes of the future. The results demonstrate that futures related to dystopian scenario archetypes such as Regional Competition, Inequality, and Breakdown are mostly underpinned by deeply individualistic and materialistic values. In contrast, futures with more sustainable and just outcomes, such as Global Sustainable Development and Regional Sustainability, tend to be underpinned by a more balanced combination of plural values of nature, with a dominant focus on nature’s contribution to societal (as opposed to individual) aspects of well-being. Furthermore, the paper identifies research gaps and illustrates the key importance of acknowledging not only people’s specific values directly related to nature, such as instrumental, intrinsic, and relational human-nature values and relationships, but also broad values and worldviews that affect the interactions between nature and society, with resulting impacts on Nature's Contributions to People and opportunities for a good quality of life.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523000908/pdfft?md5=208fadea4d7a9e38e34f594ba7636239&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343523000908-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523000908\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523000908","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

价值观已被认为是可持续转型的关键杠杆点。然而,正如未来情景和其他类型的期货相关作品所描述的那样,没有足够的证据说明哪些类型的价值与特定类型的可持续和不可持续的期货相关。本文以生物多样性和生态系统服务价值评估政府间科学政策平台的460个未来情景、愿景和其他类型的未来相关工作为基础,综合了来自学术界、私营部门、政府和非政府战略、科学政策报告和基于艺术的证据的证据,以确定不同未来原型的自然价值类型。结果表明,与区域竞争、不平等和崩溃等反乌托邦情景原型相关的未来,大多是由深刻的个人主义和物质主义价值观支撑的。相比之下,具有更可持续和公正结果的未来,如全球可持续发展和区域可持续发展,往往以更平衡的自然多元价值组合为基础,主要关注自然对社会(而不是个人)福祉的贡献。此外,本文还指出了研究差距,并说明了不仅要承认人们与自然直接相关的具体价值,如工具性、内在性和关系性的人与自然价值和关系,而且要承认影响自然与社会相互作用的广泛价值和世界观,从而影响自然对人类的贡献和获得高质量生活的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of values in future scenarios: what types of values underpin (un)sustainable and (un)just futures?

Values have been recognized as critical leverage points for sustainability transformations. However, there is limited evidence unpacking which types of values are associated with specific types of sustainable and unsustainable futures, as described by future scenarios and other types of futures-related works. This paper builds on a review of 460 future scenarios, visions, and other types of futures-related works in the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Values Assessment, synthesizing evidence from academia, private sector, governmental and non-governmental strategies, science-policy reports, and arts-based evidence, to identify the types of values of nature that underlie different archetypes of the future. The results demonstrate that futures related to dystopian scenario archetypes such as Regional Competition, Inequality, and Breakdown are mostly underpinned by deeply individualistic and materialistic values. In contrast, futures with more sustainable and just outcomes, such as Global Sustainable Development and Regional Sustainability, tend to be underpinned by a more balanced combination of plural values of nature, with a dominant focus on nature’s contribution to societal (as opposed to individual) aspects of well-being. Furthermore, the paper identifies research gaps and illustrates the key importance of acknowledging not only people’s specific values directly related to nature, such as instrumental, intrinsic, and relational human-nature values and relationships, but also broad values and worldviews that affect the interactions between nature and society, with resulting impacts on Nature's Contributions to People and opportunities for a good quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (COSUST)" is a distinguished journal within Elsevier's esteemed scientific publishing portfolio, known for its dedication to high-quality, reproducible research. Launched in 2010, COSUST is a part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite, which is recognized for its editorial excellence and global impact. The journal specializes in peer-reviewed, concise, and timely short reviews that provide a synthesis of recent literature, emerging topics, innovations, and perspectives in the field of environmental sustainability.
期刊最新文献
The potential of social innovation to shift the limits to climate adaptation Greening container terminals through optimization: a systematic review on recent advances Advancing sustainable port development in the Western Indian Ocean region Adaptation constraints, limits and enabling conditions in small island developing states Three archetypical governance pathways for transformative change toward sustainability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1