不同运动对呼吸参数的影响:一项随机对照试验

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging Pub Date : 2022-11-26 DOI:10.1111/cpf.12804
Hasan Gercek, Bayram S. Unuvar, Kamil Yilmaz, Ozlem Akkoyun Sert, Sinan Bagcaci
{"title":"不同运动对呼吸参数的影响:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Hasan Gercek,&nbsp;Bayram S. Unuvar,&nbsp;Kamil Yilmaz,&nbsp;Ozlem Akkoyun Sert,&nbsp;Sinan Bagcaci","doi":"10.1111/cpf.12804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study was designed to compare the effects of core stabilisation (CS) and auxiliary respiratory muscle strengthening exercises on oxygen consumption and respiratory parameters. A total of 51 participants were divided into three groups with block randomization method according to age and gender: CS Group (<i>n</i> = 17), Auxiliary Respiratory Muscles Exercise (ARM) Group (<i>n</i> = 17) and Control (C) Group (<i>n</i> = 17). Maximum oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>max), first second of forced expiration (FEV1)/Forced vital capacity (FVC) and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) values were evaluated before and after the study. CS and ARM strengthening exercises were applied 3 days a week for 6 weeks. The increase in the FEV1/VC values was higher in the CS and ARM groups than in the C group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed between the ARM and CS groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of VO<sub>2</sub>max values before and after the study (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The increase in the MVV values was higher in the CS and ARM groups than in the C group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed between the ARM and CS groups (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). CS and ARM exercises had positive effects on FEV1/FVC and MVV.</p>","PeriodicalId":10504,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different exercises on respiratory parameters: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Hasan Gercek,&nbsp;Bayram S. Unuvar,&nbsp;Kamil Yilmaz,&nbsp;Ozlem Akkoyun Sert,&nbsp;Sinan Bagcaci\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cpf.12804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study was designed to compare the effects of core stabilisation (CS) and auxiliary respiratory muscle strengthening exercises on oxygen consumption and respiratory parameters. A total of 51 participants were divided into three groups with block randomization method according to age and gender: CS Group (<i>n</i> = 17), Auxiliary Respiratory Muscles Exercise (ARM) Group (<i>n</i> = 17) and Control (C) Group (<i>n</i> = 17). Maximum oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>max), first second of forced expiration (FEV1)/Forced vital capacity (FVC) and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) values were evaluated before and after the study. CS and ARM strengthening exercises were applied 3 days a week for 6 weeks. The increase in the FEV1/VC values was higher in the CS and ARM groups than in the C group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed between the ARM and CS groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of VO<sub>2</sub>max values before and after the study (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The increase in the MVV values was higher in the CS and ARM groups than in the C group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed between the ARM and CS groups (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). CS and ARM exercises had positive effects on FEV1/FVC and MVV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.12804\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.12804","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较核心稳定(CS)和辅助呼吸肌强化训练对耗氧量和呼吸参数的影响。51例受试者按年龄和性别采用分组随机法分为3组:CS组(n = 17)、辅助呼吸肌运动(ARM)组(n = 17)和对照组(C)组(n = 17)。在研究前后评估最大摄氧量(VO2max)、强迫呼气第一秒(FEV1)/强迫肺活量(FVC)和最大自主通气(MVV)值。CS和ARM强化训练每周3天,连续6周。CS组和ARM组FEV1/VC值的升高高于C组(p < 0.05),而ARM组和CS组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。研究前后两组VO2max值比较,差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。CS组和ARM组MVV值的升高高于C组(p < 0.05),而ARM组和CS组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。CS和ARM运动对FEV1/FVC和MVV均有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of different exercises on respiratory parameters: A randomized controlled trial

This study was designed to compare the effects of core stabilisation (CS) and auxiliary respiratory muscle strengthening exercises on oxygen consumption and respiratory parameters. A total of 51 participants were divided into three groups with block randomization method according to age and gender: CS Group (n = 17), Auxiliary Respiratory Muscles Exercise (ARM) Group (n = 17) and Control (C) Group (n = 17). Maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max), first second of forced expiration (FEV1)/Forced vital capacity (FVC) and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) values were evaluated before and after the study. CS and ARM strengthening exercises were applied 3 days a week for 6 weeks. The increase in the FEV1/VC values was higher in the CS and ARM groups than in the C group (p < 0.05), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed between the ARM and CS groups (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of VO2max values before and after the study (p > 0.05). The increase in the MVV values was higher in the CS and ARM groups than in the C group (p < 0.05), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed between the ARM and CS groups (p > 0.05). CS and ARM exercises had positive effects on FEV1/FVC and MVV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging publishes reports on clinical and experimental research pertinent to human physiology in health and disease. The scope of the Journal is very broad, covering all aspects of the regulatory system in the cardiovascular, renal and pulmonary systems with special emphasis on methodological aspects. The focus for the journal is, however, work that has potential clinical relevance. The Journal also features review articles on recent front-line research within these fields of interest. Covered by the major abstracting services including Current Contents and Science Citation Index, Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging plays an important role in providing effective and productive communication among clinical physiologists world-wide.
期刊最新文献
Microvascular effects of a mixed meal tolerance test: a model validation study. PET/MRI in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease - a prospective accuracy study. ‘Effects of dehydration on central blood pressure in young healthy adults’ The concurrent validity of a portable ultrasound probe for muscle thickness measurements. Tortuosity of the left anterior descending artery is associated with hypertension and is not independently related to physical performance: A cardiac computed tomography study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1