选择植入式脉冲发生器用于深部脑刺激:临床实践综述。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROIMAGING Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000529495
Yara Rosalie Willems, Niels Anthony van der Gaag, Kuan Hua Kho, Øystein Vesterli Tveiten, Marie Therese Krüger, Martin Jakobs
{"title":"选择植入式脉冲发生器用于深部脑刺激:临床实践综述。","authors":"Yara Rosalie Willems,&nbsp;Niels Anthony van der Gaag,&nbsp;Kuan Hua Kho,&nbsp;Øystein Vesterli Tveiten,&nbsp;Marie Therese Krüger,&nbsp;Martin Jakobs","doi":"10.1159/000529495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The success of deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment depends on several factors, including proper patient selection, accurate electrode placement, and adequate stimulation settings. Another factor that may impact long-term satisfaction and therapy outcomes is the type of implantable pulse generator (IPG) used: rechargeable or non-rechargeable. However, there are currently no guidelines on the choice of IPG type. The present study investigates the current practices, opinions, and factors DBS clinicians consider when choosing an IPG for their patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2021 and June 2022, we sent a structured questionnaire with 42 questions to DBS experts of two international, functional neurosurgery societies. The questionnaire included a rating scale where participants could rate the factors influencing their choice of IPG type and their satisfaction with certain IPG aspects. Additionally, we presented four clinical case scenarios to assess preference of choice of IPG-type in each case.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven participants from 30 different countries completed the questionnaire. The three most relevant factors for IPG choice were \"existing social support,\" \"cognitive status,\" and \"patient age.\" Most participants believed that patients valued avoiding repetitive replacement surgeries more than the burden of regularly recharging the IPG. Participants reported that they implanted the same amount of rechargeable as non-rechargeable IPGs for primary DBS insertions and 20% converted non-rechargeable to rechargeable IPGs during IPG replacements. Most participants estimated that rechargeable was the more cost-effective option.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This present study shows that the decision-making of the choice of IPG is very individualized. We identified the key factors influencing the physician's choice of IPG. Compared to patient-centric studies, clinicians may value different aspects. Therefore, clinicians should rely not only on their opinion but also counsel patients on different types of IPGs and consider the patient's preferences. Uniform global guidelines on IPG choice may not represent regional or national differences in the healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":"101 2","pages":"135-145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choice of Implantable Pulse Generators for Deep Brain Stimulation: An Overview of Clinical Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Yara Rosalie Willems,&nbsp;Niels Anthony van der Gaag,&nbsp;Kuan Hua Kho,&nbsp;Øystein Vesterli Tveiten,&nbsp;Marie Therese Krüger,&nbsp;Martin Jakobs\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000529495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The success of deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment depends on several factors, including proper patient selection, accurate electrode placement, and adequate stimulation settings. Another factor that may impact long-term satisfaction and therapy outcomes is the type of implantable pulse generator (IPG) used: rechargeable or non-rechargeable. However, there are currently no guidelines on the choice of IPG type. The present study investigates the current practices, opinions, and factors DBS clinicians consider when choosing an IPG for their patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2021 and June 2022, we sent a structured questionnaire with 42 questions to DBS experts of two international, functional neurosurgery societies. The questionnaire included a rating scale where participants could rate the factors influencing their choice of IPG type and their satisfaction with certain IPG aspects. Additionally, we presented four clinical case scenarios to assess preference of choice of IPG-type in each case.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven participants from 30 different countries completed the questionnaire. The three most relevant factors for IPG choice were \\\"existing social support,\\\" \\\"cognitive status,\\\" and \\\"patient age.\\\" Most participants believed that patients valued avoiding repetitive replacement surgeries more than the burden of regularly recharging the IPG. Participants reported that they implanted the same amount of rechargeable as non-rechargeable IPGs for primary DBS insertions and 20% converted non-rechargeable to rechargeable IPGs during IPG replacements. Most participants estimated that rechargeable was the more cost-effective option.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This present study shows that the decision-making of the choice of IPG is very individualized. We identified the key factors influencing the physician's choice of IPG. Compared to patient-centric studies, clinicians may value different aspects. Therefore, clinicians should rely not only on their opinion but also counsel patients on different types of IPGs and consider the patient's preferences. Uniform global guidelines on IPG choice may not represent regional or national differences in the healthcare systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"101 2\",\"pages\":\"135-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529495\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑深部电刺激(DBS)治疗的成功取决于几个因素,包括正确的患者选择、准确的电极放置和适当的刺激设置。另一个可能影响长期满意度和治疗结果的因素是所使用的植入式脉冲发生器(IPG)的类型:可充电或不可充电。然而,目前还没有关于IPG类型选择的指南。本研究调查了DBS临床医生在为患者选择IPG时考虑的当前实践、观点和因素。方法:在2021年12月至2022年6月期间,我们向两个国际功能神经外科学会的DBS专家发送了一份包含42个问题的结构化问卷。问卷包括一个评分量表,参与者可以对影响他们选择IPG类型的因素和他们对IPG某些方面的满意度进行评分。此外,我们提出了四个临床案例来评估在每个案例中对ipg类型的偏好选择。结果:来自30个不同国家的87名参与者完成了问卷调查。选择IPG的三个最相关因素是“现有的社会支持”、“认知状态”和“患者年龄”。大多数参与者认为,患者更重视避免重复的替代手术,而不是定期给IPG充电的负担。参与者报告说,他们在首次DBS插入时植入了相同数量的可充电IPG和不可充电IPG, 20%的人在IPG更换期间将不可充电IPG转换为可充电IPG。大多数与会者估计,可充电电池是更具成本效益的选择。结论:本研究显示IPG的选择决策具有很强的个体化。我们确定了影响医生选择IPG的关键因素。与以患者为中心的研究相比,临床医生可能看重不同的方面。因此,临床医生不仅要依靠自己的意见,还要就不同类型的IPGs向患者提出建议,并考虑患者的偏好。关于IPG选择的统一的全球指南可能不能代表医疗保健系统的区域或国家差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Choice of Implantable Pulse Generators for Deep Brain Stimulation: An Overview of Clinical Practice.

Introduction: The success of deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment depends on several factors, including proper patient selection, accurate electrode placement, and adequate stimulation settings. Another factor that may impact long-term satisfaction and therapy outcomes is the type of implantable pulse generator (IPG) used: rechargeable or non-rechargeable. However, there are currently no guidelines on the choice of IPG type. The present study investigates the current practices, opinions, and factors DBS clinicians consider when choosing an IPG for their patients.

Methods: Between December 2021 and June 2022, we sent a structured questionnaire with 42 questions to DBS experts of two international, functional neurosurgery societies. The questionnaire included a rating scale where participants could rate the factors influencing their choice of IPG type and their satisfaction with certain IPG aspects. Additionally, we presented four clinical case scenarios to assess preference of choice of IPG-type in each case.

Results: Eighty-seven participants from 30 different countries completed the questionnaire. The three most relevant factors for IPG choice were "existing social support," "cognitive status," and "patient age." Most participants believed that patients valued avoiding repetitive replacement surgeries more than the burden of regularly recharging the IPG. Participants reported that they implanted the same amount of rechargeable as non-rechargeable IPGs for primary DBS insertions and 20% converted non-rechargeable to rechargeable IPGs during IPG replacements. Most participants estimated that rechargeable was the more cost-effective option.

Conclusion: This present study shows that the decision-making of the choice of IPG is very individualized. We identified the key factors influencing the physician's choice of IPG. Compared to patient-centric studies, clinicians may value different aspects. Therefore, clinicians should rely not only on their opinion but also counsel patients on different types of IPGs and consider the patient's preferences. Uniform global guidelines on IPG choice may not represent regional or national differences in the healthcare systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' provides a single source for the reader to keep abreast of developments in the most rapidly advancing subspecialty within neurosurgery. Technological advances in computer-assisted surgery, robotics, imaging and neurophysiology are being applied to clinical problems with ever-increasing rapidity in stereotaxis more than any other field, providing opportunities for new approaches to surgical and radiotherapeutic management of diseases of the brain, spinal cord, and spine. Issues feature advances in the use of deep-brain stimulation, imaging-guided techniques in stereotactic biopsy and craniotomy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and stereotactically implanted and guided radiotherapeutics and biologicals in the treatment of functional and movement disorders, brain tumors, and other diseases of the brain. Background information from basic science laboratories related to such clinical advances provides the reader with an overall perspective of this field. Proceedings and abstracts from many of the key international meetings furnish an overview of this specialty available nowhere else. ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' meets the information needs of both investigators and clinicians in this rapidly advancing field.
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Pain in Postherpetic Neuralgia. Dorsal Column Spinal Cord Stimulation Attenuates Brain-Spine Connectivity through Locomotion and Visuospatial-Specific Area Activation in Progressive Freezing of Gait. Joint anatomical, histological and imaging investigation of the midbrain target region for superolateral medial forebrain bundle (slMFB) DBS. Detailed Images of Deep Brain Stimulation Leads Using Micro-CT. Reoperation Rates and Risk Factors after Spinal Cord Stimulation Revision Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1