MRA、TCD 和脑电图在缺血性脑血管病颅内动脉狭窄诊断中的临床意义。

IF 6.5 3区 工程技术 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-17 DOI:10.1080/02648725.2023.2199529
Shihui Chang, Wenwen Zhang, Min Wang, Zhaoyue Wang
{"title":"MRA、TCD 和脑电图在缺血性脑血管病颅内动脉狭窄诊断中的临床意义。","authors":"Shihui Chang, Wenwen Zhang, Min Wang, Zhaoyue Wang","doi":"10.1080/02648725.2023.2199529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The clinical value of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and electroencephalogram (EEG) in the diagnosis of intracranial artery stenosis in ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICVD) was explored. The clinical data of TCD, MRA and EEG in 98 patients with ICVD were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical value of TCD, MRA combined with EEG in the diagnosis of intracranial artery stenosis in ICVD was analyzed based on the results of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard. A total of 98 patients were diagnosed with 27 cases of normal intracranial artery, 32 cases of mild stenosis, 25 cases of moderate stenosis, and 14 cases of severe stenosis DSA examination. TCD was detected in 23 cases of normal, 25 cases of mild stenosis, 23 cases of moderate stenosis and 13 cases of severe stenosis. MRA showed 24 cases of normal, 28 cases of mild stenosis, 21 cases of moderate stenosis and 12 cases of severe stenosis. EEG examination detected that there were 25 cases of normal, 24 cases of mild stenosis, 22 cases of moderate stenosis, and 14 cases of severe stenosis. Sensitivity, accuracy and negative predictive value had significant differences between combined diagnosis and single diagnosis. The combined detection of TCD, MRA and EEG is consistent with DSA detection in the diagnosis of ICVD intracranial artery stenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":55355,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"2380-2392"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical significance of MRA, TCD and electroencephalogram in the diagnosis of intracranial artery stenosis in ischemic cerebrovascular disease.\",\"authors\":\"Shihui Chang, Wenwen Zhang, Min Wang, Zhaoyue Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02648725.2023.2199529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The clinical value of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and electroencephalogram (EEG) in the diagnosis of intracranial artery stenosis in ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICVD) was explored. The clinical data of TCD, MRA and EEG in 98 patients with ICVD were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical value of TCD, MRA combined with EEG in the diagnosis of intracranial artery stenosis in ICVD was analyzed based on the results of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard. A total of 98 patients were diagnosed with 27 cases of normal intracranial artery, 32 cases of mild stenosis, 25 cases of moderate stenosis, and 14 cases of severe stenosis DSA examination. TCD was detected in 23 cases of normal, 25 cases of mild stenosis, 23 cases of moderate stenosis and 13 cases of severe stenosis. MRA showed 24 cases of normal, 28 cases of mild stenosis, 21 cases of moderate stenosis and 12 cases of severe stenosis. EEG examination detected that there were 25 cases of normal, 24 cases of mild stenosis, 22 cases of moderate stenosis, and 14 cases of severe stenosis. Sensitivity, accuracy and negative predictive value had significant differences between combined diagnosis and single diagnosis. The combined detection of TCD, MRA and EEG is consistent with DSA detection in the diagnosis of ICVD intracranial artery stenosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2380-2392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2023.2199529\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2023.2199529","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了磁共振血管造影(MRA)、经颅多普勒超声(TCD)和脑电图(EEG)在缺血性脑血管病(ICVD)颅内动脉狭窄诊断中的临床价值。回顾性分析了 98 例 ICVD 患者的 TCD、MRA 和脑电图临床数据。以数字减影血管造影术(DSA)结果为金标准,分析了 TCD、MRA 联合脑电图在诊断 ICVD 颅内动脉狭窄中的临床价值。共有 98 例患者在 DSA 检查中被诊断为颅内动脉正常 27 例、轻度狭窄 32 例、中度狭窄 25 例、重度狭窄 14 例。TCD 正常 23 例,轻度狭窄 25 例,中度狭窄 23 例,重度狭窄 13 例。MRA 显示正常 24 例,轻度狭窄 28 例,中度狭窄 21 例,重度狭窄 12 例。脑电图检查显示正常 25 例,轻度狭窄 24 例,中度狭窄 22 例,重度狭窄 14 例。联合诊断与单一诊断的敏感性、准确性和阴性预测值有显著差异。在诊断ICVD颅内动脉狭窄方面,TCD、MRA和EEG的联合检测结果与DSA检测结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical significance of MRA, TCD and electroencephalogram in the diagnosis of intracranial artery stenosis in ischemic cerebrovascular disease.

The clinical value of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and electroencephalogram (EEG) in the diagnosis of intracranial artery stenosis in ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICVD) was explored. The clinical data of TCD, MRA and EEG in 98 patients with ICVD were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical value of TCD, MRA combined with EEG in the diagnosis of intracranial artery stenosis in ICVD was analyzed based on the results of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard. A total of 98 patients were diagnosed with 27 cases of normal intracranial artery, 32 cases of mild stenosis, 25 cases of moderate stenosis, and 14 cases of severe stenosis DSA examination. TCD was detected in 23 cases of normal, 25 cases of mild stenosis, 23 cases of moderate stenosis and 13 cases of severe stenosis. MRA showed 24 cases of normal, 28 cases of mild stenosis, 21 cases of moderate stenosis and 12 cases of severe stenosis. EEG examination detected that there were 25 cases of normal, 24 cases of mild stenosis, 22 cases of moderate stenosis, and 14 cases of severe stenosis. Sensitivity, accuracy and negative predictive value had significant differences between combined diagnosis and single diagnosis. The combined detection of TCD, MRA and EEG is consistent with DSA detection in the diagnosis of ICVD intracranial artery stenosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews
Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews publishes major invited review articles covering important developments in industrial, agricultural and medical applications of biotechnology.
期刊最新文献
Application of Shouwu Yizhi prescription in decubation of patients with ischemic stroke. Analysis of non-targeted serum metabolomics in patients with chronic kidney disease and hyperuricemia. Clinical effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of chronic cholecystitis with gallstones. Evaluating the value of progressive muscle relaxation therapy for patients with lumbar disc herniation after surgery based on a difference-in-differences model. Regulation of TREM2 on BV2 inflammation through PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1