认知负荷影响眼调节和瞳孔反应

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Optometry Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.optom.2022.05.001
Matjaž Mihelčič , Anja Podlesek
{"title":"认知负荷影响眼调节和瞳孔反应","authors":"Matjaž Mihelčič ,&nbsp;Anja Podlesek","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2022.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Cognitive involvement in reading causes variations in the tonus of autonomic nerve system. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of short-term cognitive load on accommodation and pupils’ absolute values and temporal variability in test persons performing three different types of tasks.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We aimed to show how cognitive tasks of different type and difficulty level affect accommodation and pupil behavior during a short time interval.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants (<em>n</em> = 58; mean age 16.4 years, <em>SD</em> = 0.56) performed reading from a 10-inch LCD screen placed at 40 cm distance. Three different types of tasks (numerical, textual, and the Stroop task), each at three different levels of cognitive load were introduced. Participants had 90 s to complete each task. Accommodative and pupillary responses were measured with videoretinoscope Power Refractor 3 at 50 Hz.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pupil size was largest in the Stroop task (<em>M</em> = 5.20 mm, <em>SD</em> = 0.75 mm), followed by the numerical tasks (<em>M</em> = 5.02 mm, <em>SD</em> = 0.72 mm) and textual tasks (<em>M</em> = 4.78 mm, <em>SD</em> = 0.71 mm). Accommodative fluctuations – measured as accommodation <em>SD</em> – were largest in the textual tasks (<em>M</em> = 0.67 D, <em>SD</em> = 0.34 D), followed by the numerical tasks (<em>M</em> = 0.61 D, <em>SD</em> = 0.40 D) and the Stroop task (<em>M</em> = 0.52 D, <em>SD</em> = 0.21 D).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our experiment, short-term cognitive load was associated with altered pupillary and accommodative response to near tasks. In conflicting tasks (Stroop) or in performing continuing calculations, the pupils were larger; in tasks requiring logical reasoning, the accommodative fluctuations were greater. These effects can potentially be associated with current near-point stress and myopia growth models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10104792/pdf/main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive workload affects ocular accommodation and pupillary response\",\"authors\":\"Matjaž Mihelčič ,&nbsp;Anja Podlesek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optom.2022.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Cognitive involvement in reading causes variations in the tonus of autonomic nerve system. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of short-term cognitive load on accommodation and pupils’ absolute values and temporal variability in test persons performing three different types of tasks.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We aimed to show how cognitive tasks of different type and difficulty level affect accommodation and pupil behavior during a short time interval.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants (<em>n</em> = 58; mean age 16.4 years, <em>SD</em> = 0.56) performed reading from a 10-inch LCD screen placed at 40 cm distance. Three different types of tasks (numerical, textual, and the Stroop task), each at three different levels of cognitive load were introduced. Participants had 90 s to complete each task. Accommodative and pupillary responses were measured with videoretinoscope Power Refractor 3 at 50 Hz.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pupil size was largest in the Stroop task (<em>M</em> = 5.20 mm, <em>SD</em> = 0.75 mm), followed by the numerical tasks (<em>M</em> = 5.02 mm, <em>SD</em> = 0.72 mm) and textual tasks (<em>M</em> = 4.78 mm, <em>SD</em> = 0.71 mm). Accommodative fluctuations – measured as accommodation <em>SD</em> – were largest in the textual tasks (<em>M</em> = 0.67 D, <em>SD</em> = 0.34 D), followed by the numerical tasks (<em>M</em> = 0.61 D, <em>SD</em> = 0.40 D) and the Stroop task (<em>M</em> = 0.52 D, <em>SD</em> = 0.21 D).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our experiment, short-term cognitive load was associated with altered pupillary and accommodative response to near tasks. In conflicting tasks (Stroop) or in performing continuing calculations, the pupils were larger; in tasks requiring logical reasoning, the accommodative fluctuations were greater. These effects can potentially be associated with current near-point stress and myopia growth models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10104792/pdf/main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429622000322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429622000322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

显著性阅读中的认知参与导致自主神经系统张力的变化。本研究的目的是检验短期认知负荷对执行三种不同类型任务的测试人员的适应能力、学生绝对值和时间变异性的影响。目的我们旨在展示不同类型和难度水平的认知任务如何在短时间内影响学生的适应和行为。方法参与者(n=58;平均年龄16.4岁,SD=0.56)在距离40厘米的10英寸液晶屏幕上进行阅读。介绍了三种不同类型的任务(数字、文本和Stroop任务),每种任务都具有三个不同的认知负荷水平。参与者有90秒的时间来完成每项任务。调节反应和瞳孔反应用视频视黄镜功率折射器3在50Hz下测量。结果Stroop任务的瞳孔大小最大(M=5.20 mm,SD=0.75 mm),其次是数字任务(M=5.02 mm,SD=7.72 mm)和文本任务(M=4.78 mm,SD=0.71 mm)。调节波动(以调节SD衡量)在文本任务中最大(M=0.67 D,SD=0.34 D),其次是数值任务(M=0.61D,SD=0.40D)和Stroop任务(M=5.52D,SD=0.21D)。结论在我们的实验中,短期认知负荷与瞳孔和对近距离任务的调节反应的改变有关。在冲突的任务(Stroop)或进行连续计算时,瞳孔较大;在需要逻辑推理的任务中,调节性波动较大。这些影响可能与当前的近点压力和近视生长模型有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive workload affects ocular accommodation and pupillary response

Significance

Cognitive involvement in reading causes variations in the tonus of autonomic nerve system. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of short-term cognitive load on accommodation and pupils’ absolute values and temporal variability in test persons performing three different types of tasks.

Purpose

We aimed to show how cognitive tasks of different type and difficulty level affect accommodation and pupil behavior during a short time interval.

Methods

Participants (n = 58; mean age 16.4 years, SD = 0.56) performed reading from a 10-inch LCD screen placed at 40 cm distance. Three different types of tasks (numerical, textual, and the Stroop task), each at three different levels of cognitive load were introduced. Participants had 90 s to complete each task. Accommodative and pupillary responses were measured with videoretinoscope Power Refractor 3 at 50 Hz.

Results

Pupil size was largest in the Stroop task (M = 5.20 mm, SD = 0.75 mm), followed by the numerical tasks (M = 5.02 mm, SD = 0.72 mm) and textual tasks (M = 4.78 mm, SD = 0.71 mm). Accommodative fluctuations – measured as accommodation SD – were largest in the textual tasks (M = 0.67 D, SD = 0.34 D), followed by the numerical tasks (M = 0.61 D, SD = 0.40 D) and the Stroop task (M = 0.52 D, SD = 0.21 D).

Conclusions

In our experiment, short-term cognitive load was associated with altered pupillary and accommodative response to near tasks. In conflicting tasks (Stroop) or in performing continuing calculations, the pupils were larger; in tasks requiring logical reasoning, the accommodative fluctuations were greater. These effects can potentially be associated with current near-point stress and myopia growth models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Analysis of patient referrals from primary care to ophthalmology. The role of the optometrist Corneal higher-order aberrations in different types of irregular cornea Intraocular pressure and its association with ocular biometrics in Iranian children Comparison of macular thickness in diabetic patients acquired from optical coherence tomography mode and optical coherence tomography angiography mode in Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 JOptom's Web of Science (WoS) impact factor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1