触发手指释放后患者感知的恢复结果。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.03.016
Philip E. Blazar MD , Dafang Zhang MD , Jessica K. Bryant MD , Kyra A. Benavent BS , Caleb M. Yeung MD , Brandon E. Earp MD
{"title":"触发手指释放后患者感知的恢复结果。","authors":"Philip E. Blazar MD ,&nbsp;Dafang Zhang MD ,&nbsp;Jessica K. Bryant MD ,&nbsp;Kyra A. Benavent BS ,&nbsp;Caleb M. Yeung MD ,&nbsp;Brandon E. Earp MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Trigger finger release (TFR) is one of the most commonly performed hand surgeries; nevertheless, the time until patients subjectively feel recovered has not been well documented. The limited literature on patient perceptions of recovery after any type of surgery has described that patients and surgeons may have differing views on the time until full recovery. Our primary study question was to determine how long it takes for patients to subjectively feel fully recovered after TFR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>In this prospective study, patients who underwent isolated TFR completed questionnaires before surgery and at multiple time points following surgery until they reported full recovery. Patients completed visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and </span><em>Quick</em>DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) and were asked if they felt fully recovered at 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average time to self-reported full recovery was 6.2 months (SD 2.6), and the median time to self-reported full recovery was 6 months (IQR 4 months). At 12 months, four out of 50 patients (8%) did not feel fully recovered. <em>Quick</em><span>DASH and VAS pain scores improved significantly from preoperative assessment to final follow-up. All patients reported improvement in both VAS pain scores and </span><em>Quick</em><span><span>DASH scores greater than the </span>minimal clinically important difference between 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery. Higher preoperative VAS and </span><em>Quick</em>DASH scores were associated with failure to fully recover by 12 months after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The length of time after surgery until patients felt fully recovered after isolated TFR is longer than the senior authors’ expectations. This suggests that patients and surgeons may consider distinctly different parameters when discussing recovery. Surgeons should be aware of this discrepancy when discussing recovery after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Prognostic II.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":"49 12","pages":"Pages 1264.e1-1264.e6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-Perceived Outcomes of Recovery After Trigger Digit Release\",\"authors\":\"Philip E. Blazar MD ,&nbsp;Dafang Zhang MD ,&nbsp;Jessica K. Bryant MD ,&nbsp;Kyra A. Benavent BS ,&nbsp;Caleb M. Yeung MD ,&nbsp;Brandon E. Earp MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.03.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Trigger finger release (TFR) is one of the most commonly performed hand surgeries; nevertheless, the time until patients subjectively feel recovered has not been well documented. The limited literature on patient perceptions of recovery after any type of surgery has described that patients and surgeons may have differing views on the time until full recovery. Our primary study question was to determine how long it takes for patients to subjectively feel fully recovered after TFR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>In this prospective study, patients who underwent isolated TFR completed questionnaires before surgery and at multiple time points following surgery until they reported full recovery. Patients completed visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and </span><em>Quick</em>DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) and were asked if they felt fully recovered at 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average time to self-reported full recovery was 6.2 months (SD 2.6), and the median time to self-reported full recovery was 6 months (IQR 4 months). At 12 months, four out of 50 patients (8%) did not feel fully recovered. <em>Quick</em><span>DASH and VAS pain scores improved significantly from preoperative assessment to final follow-up. All patients reported improvement in both VAS pain scores and </span><em>Quick</em><span><span>DASH scores greater than the </span>minimal clinically important difference between 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery. Higher preoperative VAS and </span><em>Quick</em>DASH scores were associated with failure to fully recover by 12 months after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The length of time after surgery until patients felt fully recovered after isolated TFR is longer than the senior authors’ expectations. This suggests that patients and surgeons may consider distinctly different parameters when discussing recovery. Surgeons should be aware of this discrepancy when discussing recovery after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Prognostic II.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"volume\":\"49 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1264.e1-1264.e6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502323001673\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502323001673","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:扳机指松解术(TFR)是最常用的手部手术之一;然而,直到病人主观感觉恢复的时间没有很好的记录。关于任何类型手术后患者对恢复的看法的有限文献描述了患者和外科医生可能对完全恢复的时间有不同的看法。我们的主要研究问题是确定患者在TFR后主观感觉完全恢复需要多长时间。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,接受孤立性TFR的患者在手术前和术后多个时间点完成问卷调查,直到他们报告完全康复。患者完成视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分和QuickDASH(手臂、肩膀和手的残疾),并询问他们在4周、6周、3、6、9和12个月时是否感觉完全恢复。结果:自报告完全恢复的平均时间为6.2个月(SD 2.6),自报告完全恢复的中位时间为6个月(IQR 4个月)。12个月时,50名患者中有4名(8%)感觉没有完全康复。从术前评估到最终随访,QuickDASH和VAS疼痛评分均有显著改善。手术后6周和3个月,所有患者报告的VAS疼痛评分和QuickDASH评分的改善大于最小的临床重要差异。术前VAS和QuickDASH评分较高与术后12个月未能完全恢复相关。结论:孤立性TFR术后患者感觉完全恢复的时间比资深作者预期的要长。这表明患者和外科医生在讨论恢复时可能考虑明显不同的参数。外科医生在讨论术后恢复时应该注意到这种差异。研究类型/证据水平:预后II。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient-Perceived Outcomes of Recovery After Trigger Digit Release

Purpose

Trigger finger release (TFR) is one of the most commonly performed hand surgeries; nevertheless, the time until patients subjectively feel recovered has not been well documented. The limited literature on patient perceptions of recovery after any type of surgery has described that patients and surgeons may have differing views on the time until full recovery. Our primary study question was to determine how long it takes for patients to subjectively feel fully recovered after TFR.

Methods

In this prospective study, patients who underwent isolated TFR completed questionnaires before surgery and at multiple time points following surgery until they reported full recovery. Patients completed visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) and were asked if they felt fully recovered at 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Results

The average time to self-reported full recovery was 6.2 months (SD 2.6), and the median time to self-reported full recovery was 6 months (IQR 4 months). At 12 months, four out of 50 patients (8%) did not feel fully recovered. QuickDASH and VAS pain scores improved significantly from preoperative assessment to final follow-up. All patients reported improvement in both VAS pain scores and QuickDASH scores greater than the minimal clinically important difference between 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery. Higher preoperative VAS and QuickDASH scores were associated with failure to fully recover by 12 months after surgery.

Conclusions

The length of time after surgery until patients felt fully recovered after isolated TFR is longer than the senior authors’ expectations. This suggests that patients and surgeons may consider distinctly different parameters when discussing recovery. Surgeons should be aware of this discrepancy when discussing recovery after surgery.

Type of study/level of evidence

Prognostic II.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Development of International Quality Measures Targeting Low-Value Care in Hand Surgery. Replication of Coupled Movements of the Wrist: A Cadaveric Study of Total Wrist Arthroplasty. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Distal Radius Fractures Following Dorsal Bridge Fixation to the Second Versus Third Metacarpal. SARM1 Inhibition Maintains Axonal Integrity After Rat Sciatic Nerve Transection and Repair. Distal Radius Fracture in the Setting of Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Management and Adverse Events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1