含过硫酸钾的美白凝胶和美白牙膏的口腔和口腔周围刺激和致敏潜力的评价。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2023-04-01
Yiming Li, Montry S Suprono, Connie Cheung, Daniella U Ross, Brian A Wall, Cajetan Dogo-Isonagie, Michele Arambula, Xing Xin
{"title":"含过硫酸钾的美白凝胶和美白牙膏的口腔和口腔周围刺激和致敏潜力的评价。","authors":"Yiming Li,&nbsp;Montry S Suprono,&nbsp;Connie Cheung,&nbsp;Daniella U Ross,&nbsp;Brian A Wall,&nbsp;Cajetan Dogo-Isonagie,&nbsp;Michele Arambula,&nbsp;Xing Xin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Two clinical trials were conducted to investigate the oral and perioral irritation and sensitization potential of a tooth whitening leave-on-gel alone and in combination with a whitening toothpaste, each containing 1.0% of the active ingredient potassium monopersulfate (MPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both clinical trials were Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, double-blind, randomized, and parallel group designed studies. For the MPS leave-on gel study, 200 qualifying and consented subjects were randomly assigned to two groups: (1) 0.1% hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) gel pen (34 subjects); and (2) 0.1% H₂O₂ + 1.0% MPS gel pen (166 subjects). Subjects used the assigned products according to instructions provided and returned on Days 22 and 36 for oral and perioral tissue examination (pre-challenge). At the Day 36 visit, the subject applied the assigned gel on site (challenge) and received oral and perioral tissue examinations 1 and 24 hours following the application to detect any post-challenge tissue reactions. For the MPS toothpaste/MPS gel pen study, 200 qualifying and consented subjects were randomly assigned to three groups: (1) Placebo toothpaste + placebo gel pen (66 subjects); (2) 1.0% MPS toothpaste + 1.0% MPS gel pen (67 subjects); and (3) 1.0% MPS toothpaste + placebo gel pen (67 subjects). The study design and procedures were the same as those for the MPS gel pen study described above.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the MPS gel pen study, 192 subjects completed the study. None of the eight dropouts was related to the product use. The demographic data were comparable between the two groups. No evidence of tissue irritation and sensitization was detected in any subjects at any visit, and the findings were comparable between the groups. The detected and self-reported tissue issues were minimal and minor, and they were comparable between the two groups. For the MPS toothpaste/MPS gel pen study, 200 subjects were enrolled with 12 dropped from the study, resulting in an overall dropout rate of 6%. Of the 12 that did not complete the study, none were due to product-related use. The demographic data were comparable among the three groups. The detected and self-reported tissue issues were minimal and minor, and they were comparable among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Potassium monopersulfate (MPS) at the active concentration of 1.0% in the tooth whitening leave-on-gel and the toothpaste plus the gel did not cause oral/perioral irritation nor sensitization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"36 2","pages":"95-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of oral and perioral irritation and sensitization potential of a whitening gel and a whitening toothpaste containing potassium monopersulfate.\",\"authors\":\"Yiming Li,&nbsp;Montry S Suprono,&nbsp;Connie Cheung,&nbsp;Daniella U Ross,&nbsp;Brian A Wall,&nbsp;Cajetan Dogo-Isonagie,&nbsp;Michele Arambula,&nbsp;Xing Xin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Two clinical trials were conducted to investigate the oral and perioral irritation and sensitization potential of a tooth whitening leave-on-gel alone and in combination with a whitening toothpaste, each containing 1.0% of the active ingredient potassium monopersulfate (MPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both clinical trials were Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, double-blind, randomized, and parallel group designed studies. For the MPS leave-on gel study, 200 qualifying and consented subjects were randomly assigned to two groups: (1) 0.1% hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) gel pen (34 subjects); and (2) 0.1% H₂O₂ + 1.0% MPS gel pen (166 subjects). Subjects used the assigned products according to instructions provided and returned on Days 22 and 36 for oral and perioral tissue examination (pre-challenge). At the Day 36 visit, the subject applied the assigned gel on site (challenge) and received oral and perioral tissue examinations 1 and 24 hours following the application to detect any post-challenge tissue reactions. For the MPS toothpaste/MPS gel pen study, 200 qualifying and consented subjects were randomly assigned to three groups: (1) Placebo toothpaste + placebo gel pen (66 subjects); (2) 1.0% MPS toothpaste + 1.0% MPS gel pen (67 subjects); and (3) 1.0% MPS toothpaste + placebo gel pen (67 subjects). The study design and procedures were the same as those for the MPS gel pen study described above.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the MPS gel pen study, 192 subjects completed the study. None of the eight dropouts was related to the product use. The demographic data were comparable between the two groups. No evidence of tissue irritation and sensitization was detected in any subjects at any visit, and the findings were comparable between the groups. The detected and self-reported tissue issues were minimal and minor, and they were comparable between the two groups. For the MPS toothpaste/MPS gel pen study, 200 subjects were enrolled with 12 dropped from the study, resulting in an overall dropout rate of 6%. Of the 12 that did not complete the study, none were due to product-related use. The demographic data were comparable among the three groups. The detected and self-reported tissue issues were minimal and minor, and they were comparable among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Potassium monopersulfate (MPS) at the active concentration of 1.0% in the tooth whitening leave-on-gel and the toothpaste plus the gel did not cause oral/perioral irritation nor sensitization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"95-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:进行了两项临床试验,研究了牙齿美白凝胶单独使用和与美白牙膏联合使用(每种牙膏含有1.0%的活性成分单过硫酸钾(MPS))对口腔和口腔周围的刺激和致敏潜力。方法:两项临床试验均为机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的双盲、随机、平行组设计的研究。对于MPS免洗凝胶研究,200名符合条件并同意的受试者被随机分为两组:(1)0.1%过氧化氢(H₂O₂)凝胶笔(34名受试者);(2) 0.1% h2o2 + 1.0% MPS凝胶笔(166例)。受试者根据提供的说明使用指定的产品,并于第22天和第36天返回进行口腔和口腔周围组织检查(预激药)。在第36天的访问中,受试者在现场涂抹指定的凝胶(攻毒),并在涂抹后1和24小时接受口腔和口周组织检查,以检测任何攻毒后组织反应。在MPS牙膏/MPS凝胶笔研究中,200名符合条件和同意的受试者被随机分为三组:(1)安慰剂牙膏+安慰剂凝胶笔(66名受试者);(2) 1.0% MPS牙膏+ 1.0% MPS凝胶笔(67例);(3) 1.0% MPS牙膏+安慰剂凝胶笔(67例)。研究设计和程序与上述MPS凝胶笔研究相同。结果:MPS凝胶笔研究有192名受试者完成了研究。8名退选患者都与产品使用无关。两组的人口统计数据具有可比性。在任何一次访问中,在任何受试者中都没有检测到组织刺激和致敏的证据,并且两组之间的发现具有可比性。检测到的和自我报告的组织问题是最小和轻微的,它们在两组之间具有可比性。在MPS牙膏/MPS凝胶笔研究中,200名受试者被纳入研究,其中12人退出研究,导致总退学率为6%。在12个没有完成研究的人中,没有一个是由于与产品相关的使用。三组人口统计数据具有可比性。检测到的和自我报告的组织问题是最小和轻微的,并且它们在三组之间具有可比性。临床意义:单过硫酸钾(MPS)在牙齿美白免洗凝胶和牙膏加凝胶中的活性浓度为1.0%时,没有引起口腔/口周刺激和致敏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of oral and perioral irritation and sensitization potential of a whitening gel and a whitening toothpaste containing potassium monopersulfate.

Purpose: Two clinical trials were conducted to investigate the oral and perioral irritation and sensitization potential of a tooth whitening leave-on-gel alone and in combination with a whitening toothpaste, each containing 1.0% of the active ingredient potassium monopersulfate (MPS).

Methods: Both clinical trials were Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, double-blind, randomized, and parallel group designed studies. For the MPS leave-on gel study, 200 qualifying and consented subjects were randomly assigned to two groups: (1) 0.1% hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) gel pen (34 subjects); and (2) 0.1% H₂O₂ + 1.0% MPS gel pen (166 subjects). Subjects used the assigned products according to instructions provided and returned on Days 22 and 36 for oral and perioral tissue examination (pre-challenge). At the Day 36 visit, the subject applied the assigned gel on site (challenge) and received oral and perioral tissue examinations 1 and 24 hours following the application to detect any post-challenge tissue reactions. For the MPS toothpaste/MPS gel pen study, 200 qualifying and consented subjects were randomly assigned to three groups: (1) Placebo toothpaste + placebo gel pen (66 subjects); (2) 1.0% MPS toothpaste + 1.0% MPS gel pen (67 subjects); and (3) 1.0% MPS toothpaste + placebo gel pen (67 subjects). The study design and procedures were the same as those for the MPS gel pen study described above.

Results: For the MPS gel pen study, 192 subjects completed the study. None of the eight dropouts was related to the product use. The demographic data were comparable between the two groups. No evidence of tissue irritation and sensitization was detected in any subjects at any visit, and the findings were comparable between the groups. The detected and self-reported tissue issues were minimal and minor, and they were comparable between the two groups. For the MPS toothpaste/MPS gel pen study, 200 subjects were enrolled with 12 dropped from the study, resulting in an overall dropout rate of 6%. Of the 12 that did not complete the study, none were due to product-related use. The demographic data were comparable among the three groups. The detected and self-reported tissue issues were minimal and minor, and they were comparable among the three groups.

Clinical significance: Potassium monopersulfate (MPS) at the active concentration of 1.0% in the tooth whitening leave-on-gel and the toothpaste plus the gel did not cause oral/perioral irritation nor sensitization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
期刊最新文献
A comparison of polishing systems and thermal cycling on the surface roughness and color stability of a single-shade resin composite. Charcoal dentifrices: A laboratory study of their safety and efficacy. Current landscape of research on whitening toothpastes and their effects on dental hard tissue. Effects of salivary contamination on the shear bond strengths of universal adhesives to dentin. Framework's marginal adaptation evaluation of fixed partial denture using conventional and digital impression techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1