玻璃体切割手术中全身麻醉时音乐对麻醉消耗的影响。

Ardeshir Tajbakhsh, Sohrab Salimi, Narsis Daftarian, Dariush Abtahi
{"title":"玻璃体切割手术中全身麻醉时音乐对麻醉消耗的影响。","authors":"Ardeshir Tajbakhsh,&nbsp;Sohrab Salimi,&nbsp;Narsis Daftarian,&nbsp;Dariush Abtahi","doi":"10.4103/abr.abr_444_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Controversy remains about the positive role of music during general anesthesia and postoperative recovery. We, therefore, tested the hypothesis that intraoperative exposure to classical music reduces the propofol necessary to maintain the bispectral index (BIS) close to 50 during vitrectomy surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This double-blind clinical study is evaluating 50 patients undergoing vitrectomy surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to music and white noise groups, and relevant sounds were played to patients after induction of anesthesia. The two groups were compared for the use of propofol as an anesthetic to maintain a BIS near 50 and for postoperative pain, anxiety, nausea, and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propofol consumption to maintain the set BIS score was much lower in the music group than in the white noise group (78.72 ± 25.76 microgram/kg/min and 117.91 ± 36.78 microgram/kg/min, respectively, <i>P</i>-value = 0.000). Postoperative pain scores were also much lower in the music group than in the white noise group (<i>P</i>-value = 0.000) and anxiety levels between these two groups did not differ (<i>P</i>-value = 0.870). No patient in the music group had complaints of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) compared to six patients in the white noise group (<i>P</i>-value = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Listening to music during general anesthesia for vitrectomy surgery can reduce the use of anesthetics, postoperative pain, and PONV. Further, controlled studies are necessary to confirm our results.</p>","PeriodicalId":7225,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Biomedical Research","volume":"12 ","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4d/eb/ABR-12-59.PMC10186032.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Music During General Anesthesia on Anesthetic Consumption During Vitrectomy Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Ardeshir Tajbakhsh,&nbsp;Sohrab Salimi,&nbsp;Narsis Daftarian,&nbsp;Dariush Abtahi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/abr.abr_444_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Controversy remains about the positive role of music during general anesthesia and postoperative recovery. We, therefore, tested the hypothesis that intraoperative exposure to classical music reduces the propofol necessary to maintain the bispectral index (BIS) close to 50 during vitrectomy surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This double-blind clinical study is evaluating 50 patients undergoing vitrectomy surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to music and white noise groups, and relevant sounds were played to patients after induction of anesthesia. The two groups were compared for the use of propofol as an anesthetic to maintain a BIS near 50 and for postoperative pain, anxiety, nausea, and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propofol consumption to maintain the set BIS score was much lower in the music group than in the white noise group (78.72 ± 25.76 microgram/kg/min and 117.91 ± 36.78 microgram/kg/min, respectively, <i>P</i>-value = 0.000). Postoperative pain scores were also much lower in the music group than in the white noise group (<i>P</i>-value = 0.000) and anxiety levels between these two groups did not differ (<i>P</i>-value = 0.870). No patient in the music group had complaints of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) compared to six patients in the white noise group (<i>P</i>-value = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Listening to music during general anesthesia for vitrectomy surgery can reduce the use of anesthetics, postoperative pain, and PONV. Further, controlled studies are necessary to confirm our results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Biomedical Research\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4d/eb/ABR-12-59.PMC10186032.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Biomedical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_444_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_444_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:音乐在全身麻醉和术后恢复中的积极作用仍存在争议。因此,我们验证了这样一个假设,即在玻璃体切割手术中,术中暴露于古典音乐可以减少丙泊酚,使双谱指数(BIS)保持在接近50的水平。材料与方法:本双盲临床研究评估50例全麻下玻璃体切除术患者。将患者随机分为音乐组和白噪声组,诱导麻醉后对患者播放相应的声音。比较两组使用异丙酚作为麻醉剂维持BIS接近50的情况,以及术后疼痛、焦虑、恶心和呕吐的情况。结果:音乐组维持BIS评分的异丙酚消耗量明显低于白噪声组(分别为78.72±25.76 μ g/ kg/min和117.91±36.78 μ g/ kg/min, p值= 0.000)。音乐组术后疼痛评分也明显低于白噪声组(p值= 0.000),两组患者的焦虑水平无显著差异(p值= 0.870)。与白噪声组6例患者相比,音乐组无患者出现术后恶心呕吐(PONV)主诉(p值= 0.011)。结论:玻璃体切割手术全身麻醉时听音乐可减少麻醉剂的使用、术后疼痛和PONV。此外,需要对照研究来证实我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Music During General Anesthesia on Anesthetic Consumption During Vitrectomy Surgery.

Background: Controversy remains about the positive role of music during general anesthesia and postoperative recovery. We, therefore, tested the hypothesis that intraoperative exposure to classical music reduces the propofol necessary to maintain the bispectral index (BIS) close to 50 during vitrectomy surgery.

Materials and methods: This double-blind clinical study is evaluating 50 patients undergoing vitrectomy surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to music and white noise groups, and relevant sounds were played to patients after induction of anesthesia. The two groups were compared for the use of propofol as an anesthetic to maintain a BIS near 50 and for postoperative pain, anxiety, nausea, and vomiting.

Results: Propofol consumption to maintain the set BIS score was much lower in the music group than in the white noise group (78.72 ± 25.76 microgram/kg/min and 117.91 ± 36.78 microgram/kg/min, respectively, P-value = 0.000). Postoperative pain scores were also much lower in the music group than in the white noise group (P-value = 0.000) and anxiety levels between these two groups did not differ (P-value = 0.870). No patient in the music group had complaints of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) compared to six patients in the white noise group (P-value = 0.011).

Conclusions: Listening to music during general anesthesia for vitrectomy surgery can reduce the use of anesthetics, postoperative pain, and PONV. Further, controlled studies are necessary to confirm our results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cytotoxic Sulfoquinovosyl Glycerols from the Seaweed Sargassum Angustifolium from Persian Gulf Effect of Silybum Marianum on Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity with Cisplatin Evaluation of IP3R3 Gene Silencing Effect on Pyruvate Dehydrogenase (PDH) Enzyme Activity in Breast Cancer Cells with and Without Estrogen Receptor Diagnostic Value of Dermoscopic Structures in Predicting Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma in the Skin of Color The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1