下流而高尚的笔记:相互依存结构驱动自私自利的流言蜚语

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-25 DOI:10.1177/01461672231171054
Terence D Dores Cruz, Romy van der Lee, Myriam N Bechtoldt, Bianca Beersma
{"title":"下流而高尚的笔记:相互依存结构驱动自私自利的流言蜚语","authors":"Terence D Dores Cruz, Romy van der Lee, Myriam N Bechtoldt, Bianca Beersma","doi":"10.1177/01461672231171054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Much information people receive about others reaches them via gossip. But is this gossip trustworthy? We examined this in a scenario study (<i>N</i><sub>senders</sub> = 350, <i>N</i><sub>observations</sub> = 700) and an interactive laboratory experiment (<i>N</i><sub>senders</sub> = 126; <i>N</i><sub>observations</sub> = 3024). In both studies, participants played a sequential prisoner's dilemma where a gossip <i>sender</i> observed a <i>target</i>'s (first decider's) decision and could gossip about this to a <i>receiver</i> (second decider). We manipulated the interdependence structure such that gossipers' outcomes were equal to targets' outcomes, equal to receivers' outcomes, or independent. Compared to no interdependence, gossip was more often false when gossipers were interdependent with targets but not when interdependent with receivers. As such, false positive gossip (self-serving when interdependent with targets) increased but false negative gossip (self-serving when interdependent with receivers) did not. In conclusion, the interdependence structure affected gossip's trustworthiness: When gossipers' outcomes were interdependent with targets, gossip was less trustworthy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nasty and Noble Notes: Interdependence Structures Drive Self-Serving Gossip.\",\"authors\":\"Terence D Dores Cruz, Romy van der Lee, Myriam N Bechtoldt, Bianca Beersma\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01461672231171054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Much information people receive about others reaches them via gossip. But is this gossip trustworthy? We examined this in a scenario study (<i>N</i><sub>senders</sub> = 350, <i>N</i><sub>observations</sub> = 700) and an interactive laboratory experiment (<i>N</i><sub>senders</sub> = 126; <i>N</i><sub>observations</sub> = 3024). In both studies, participants played a sequential prisoner's dilemma where a gossip <i>sender</i> observed a <i>target</i>'s (first decider's) decision and could gossip about this to a <i>receiver</i> (second decider). We manipulated the interdependence structure such that gossipers' outcomes were equal to targets' outcomes, equal to receivers' outcomes, or independent. Compared to no interdependence, gossip was more often false when gossipers were interdependent with targets but not when interdependent with receivers. As such, false positive gossip (self-serving when interdependent with targets) increased but false negative gossip (self-serving when interdependent with receivers) did not. In conclusion, the interdependence structure affected gossip's trustworthiness: When gossipers' outcomes were interdependent with targets, gossip was less trustworthy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492547/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231171054\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231171054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们通过流言蜚语获得了许多关于他人的信息。但这些流言蜚语可信吗?我们在一项情景研究(参与者人数 = 350,观察人数 = 700)和一项互动实验室实验(参与者人数 = 126;观察人数 = 3024)中对此进行了研究。在这两项研究中,参与者都玩了一个连续的囚徒困境游戏,在这个游戏中,流言发送者观察到了目标(第一决定者)的决定,并可以向接收者(第二决定者)说三道四。我们对相互依赖结构进行了调整,使流言发送者的结果等于目标者的结果、等于接收者的结果或独立于目标者的结果。与没有相互依赖关系相比,当流言者与目标相互依赖时,流言的错误率更高;而当流言者与接收者相互依赖时,流言的错误率则不高。因此,虚假的正面流言(与目标相互依赖时为自己服务)增加了,但虚假的负面流言(与接收者相互依赖时为自己服务)没有增加。总之,相互依赖结构影响了流言的可信度:当流言者的结果与目标相互依赖时,流言的可信度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nasty and Noble Notes: Interdependence Structures Drive Self-Serving Gossip.

Much information people receive about others reaches them via gossip. But is this gossip trustworthy? We examined this in a scenario study (Nsenders = 350, Nobservations = 700) and an interactive laboratory experiment (Nsenders = 126; Nobservations = 3024). In both studies, participants played a sequential prisoner's dilemma where a gossip sender observed a target's (first decider's) decision and could gossip about this to a receiver (second decider). We manipulated the interdependence structure such that gossipers' outcomes were equal to targets' outcomes, equal to receivers' outcomes, or independent. Compared to no interdependence, gossip was more often false when gossipers were interdependent with targets but not when interdependent with receivers. As such, false positive gossip (self-serving when interdependent with targets) increased but false negative gossip (self-serving when interdependent with receivers) did not. In conclusion, the interdependence structure affected gossip's trustworthiness: When gossipers' outcomes were interdependent with targets, gossip was less trustworthy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.
期刊最新文献
Extreme Reactions to Globalization: Investigating Indirect, Longitudinal, and Experimental Effects of the Globalization-Radicalization Nexus. Understanding the Magnitude of Hypocrisy in Moral Contradictions: The Role of Surprise at Violating Strong Attitudes. Do Good Citizens Look to the Future? The Link Between National Identification and Future Time Perspective and Their Role in Explaining Citizens' Reactions to Conflicts Between Short-Term and Long-Term National Interests. How Elicitation Procedure Shapes Beliefs About Others' Affective Responses to Action and Inaction. Beautiful Strangers: Physical Evaluation of Strangers Is Influenced by Friendship Expectation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1