心理干预对接受辅助生殖技术治疗的不孕妇女怀孕率的影响:随机对照试验荟萃分析。

IF 6.5 3区 工程技术 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-18 DOI:10.1080/02648725.2023.2213080
Chaorong Bian, Jie Cao, Kejin Chen, Xiyang Xia, Xuexia Yu
{"title":"心理干预对接受辅助生殖技术治疗的不孕妇女怀孕率的影响:随机对照试验荟萃分析。","authors":"Chaorong Bian, Jie Cao, Kejin Chen, Xiyang Xia, Xuexia Yu","doi":"10.1080/02648725.2023.2213080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of psychological interventions on the pregnancy rates of infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Using the electronic databases PubMed, EM Base, Cochrane Library, WOS, CNKI, WanFang Data, CSTJ, and CBM, a systematic literature search was conducted in the second week of August 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of psychological interventions on the pregnancy rate of infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology were collected. There is no time limit for this search setting. The language is limited to Chinese or English. Two investigators independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies, and then used Revman5.3 and STATA16.0 software for meta-analysis. A total of 25 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis, including 2098 patients in the experimental group and 2075 patients in the control group. There was a significant difference in the pregnancy rate between the two groups [RR=1.31, 95%CI(1.22,1.40)]. Subgroup analysis showed that this is also true of infertile women of different nationalities, different intervention timing and format. However, different psychological interventions may indeed have different effects. Current evidence suggests that psychological interventions may improve pregnancy rates in infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Limited by the quantity and quality of included studies, the above conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality studies. Our PROSPERO registration number is: CRD42019140666.</p>","PeriodicalId":55355,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"4512-4531"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of psychological interventions on pregnancy rates in infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Chaorong Bian, Jie Cao, Kejin Chen, Xiyang Xia, Xuexia Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02648725.2023.2213080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of psychological interventions on the pregnancy rates of infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Using the electronic databases PubMed, EM Base, Cochrane Library, WOS, CNKI, WanFang Data, CSTJ, and CBM, a systematic literature search was conducted in the second week of August 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of psychological interventions on the pregnancy rate of infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology were collected. There is no time limit for this search setting. The language is limited to Chinese or English. Two investigators independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies, and then used Revman5.3 and STATA16.0 software for meta-analysis. A total of 25 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis, including 2098 patients in the experimental group and 2075 patients in the control group. There was a significant difference in the pregnancy rate between the two groups [RR=1.31, 95%CI(1.22,1.40)]. Subgroup analysis showed that this is also true of infertile women of different nationalities, different intervention timing and format. However, different psychological interventions may indeed have different effects. Current evidence suggests that psychological interventions may improve pregnancy rates in infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Limited by the quantity and quality of included studies, the above conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality studies. Our PROSPERO registration number is: CRD42019140666.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4512-4531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2023.2213080\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2023.2213080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估心理干预对接受辅助生殖技术(ART)治疗的不孕妇女怀孕率的影响。利用电子数据库PubMed、EM Base、Cochrane Library、WOS、CNKI、万方数据、CSTJ和CBM,于2019年8月第二周进行了系统文献检索。收集了关于心理干预对接受辅助生殖技术的不孕妇女怀孕率影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。该检索设置没有时间限制。语言限于中文或英文。两名研究者独立筛选文献、提取数据、评估纳入研究的偏倚风险,然后使用Revman5.3和STATA16.0软件进行荟萃分析。本次荟萃分析共纳入了 25 项随机对照试验,其中实验组患者 2098 例,对照组患者 2075 例。两组患者的怀孕率存在明显差异[RR=1.31,95%CI(1.22,1.40)]。分组分析表明,不同国籍、不同干预时间和形式的不孕妇女的情况也是如此。然而,不同的心理干预确实可能产生不同的效果。目前的证据表明,心理干预可提高接受辅助生殖技术治疗的不孕妇女的怀孕率。限于纳入研究的数量和质量,上述结论还需要更多高质量的研究来验证。我们的 PROSPERO 注册号是CRD42019140666。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of psychological interventions on pregnancy rates in infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of psychological interventions on the pregnancy rates of infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Using the electronic databases PubMed, EM Base, Cochrane Library, WOS, CNKI, WanFang Data, CSTJ, and CBM, a systematic literature search was conducted in the second week of August 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of psychological interventions on the pregnancy rate of infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology were collected. There is no time limit for this search setting. The language is limited to Chinese or English. Two investigators independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies, and then used Revman5.3 and STATA16.0 software for meta-analysis. A total of 25 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis, including 2098 patients in the experimental group and 2075 patients in the control group. There was a significant difference in the pregnancy rate between the two groups [RR=1.31, 95%CI(1.22,1.40)]. Subgroup analysis showed that this is also true of infertile women of different nationalities, different intervention timing and format. However, different psychological interventions may indeed have different effects. Current evidence suggests that psychological interventions may improve pregnancy rates in infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Limited by the quantity and quality of included studies, the above conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality studies. Our PROSPERO registration number is: CRD42019140666.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews
Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews publishes major invited review articles covering important developments in industrial, agricultural and medical applications of biotechnology.
期刊最新文献
Application of Shouwu Yizhi prescription in decubation of patients with ischemic stroke. Analysis of non-targeted serum metabolomics in patients with chronic kidney disease and hyperuricemia. Clinical effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of chronic cholecystitis with gallstones. Evaluating the value of progressive muscle relaxation therapy for patients with lumbar disc herniation after surgery based on a difference-in-differences model. Regulation of TREM2 on BV2 inflammation through PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1