火灾之后:关于长期恢复组织在满足农村社区野火后需求方面作用的定性研究。

Environmental research, health : ERH Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-30 DOI:10.1088/2752-5309/acd2f7
Kathleen Moloney, Jamie Vickery, Jeremy Hess, Nicole Errett
{"title":"火灾之后:关于长期恢复组织在满足农村社区野火后需求方面作用的定性研究。","authors":"Kathleen Moloney, Jamie Vickery, Jeremy Hess, Nicole Errett","doi":"10.1088/2752-5309/acd2f7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>U.S. wildfire activity has increased over the past several decades, disrupting the systems and infrastructure that support community health and resilience. As the cumulative burden of wildfire damage is projected to increase, understanding an effective community recovery process is critically important. Through qualitative interviews with leaders of long-term recovery organizations (LTROs), a key component of wildfire recovery, we explored barriers and facilitators to LTROs' ability to support post-wildfire needs among rural communities. Between February-May 2022, we conducted surveys and semi-structured interviews with 18 leaders from six LTROs serving rural communities in Washington, Oregon, and California impacted by wildfires between 2015-2020. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Culture of Health Framework informed the semi-structured interview guide and <i>a priori</i> codebook, to examine LTROs' ability to address post-wildfire community needs from a health equity perspective. Additional codes were added through an inductive approach, and emerging themes were identified. Our findings indicate that LTROs face many barriers in addressing community needs post-wildfire, including the policies governing access to and the slow arrival of recovery resources, the intertwined nature of community economic health and built environment restoration, and the challenge of forming a functional LTRO structure. However, participants also identified facilitators of LTROs' work, including the ability of LTROs and their government partners to adapt policies and procedures, and close collaboration with other community organizations. Factors both internal and external to the community and LTROs' organizational characteristics influence their ability to address community needs, essential to health, post-wildfire. This study's findings suggest the need for policy improvements to promote more equitable recovery resource access, that economic recovery should be a core LTRO function, and that recovery planning should be incorporated into community disaster preparedness activities. Future research should focus on LTROs' role in other contexts and in response to other disasters.</p>","PeriodicalId":72938,"journal":{"name":"Environmental research, health : ERH","volume":"1 2","pages":"021009"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"After the fire: A qualitative study of the role of long-term recovery organizations in addressing rural communities' post-wildfire needs.\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen Moloney, Jamie Vickery, Jeremy Hess, Nicole Errett\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2752-5309/acd2f7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>U.S. wildfire activity has increased over the past several decades, disrupting the systems and infrastructure that support community health and resilience. As the cumulative burden of wildfire damage is projected to increase, understanding an effective community recovery process is critically important. Through qualitative interviews with leaders of long-term recovery organizations (LTROs), a key component of wildfire recovery, we explored barriers and facilitators to LTROs' ability to support post-wildfire needs among rural communities. Between February-May 2022, we conducted surveys and semi-structured interviews with 18 leaders from six LTROs serving rural communities in Washington, Oregon, and California impacted by wildfires between 2015-2020. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Culture of Health Framework informed the semi-structured interview guide and <i>a priori</i> codebook, to examine LTROs' ability to address post-wildfire community needs from a health equity perspective. Additional codes were added through an inductive approach, and emerging themes were identified. Our findings indicate that LTROs face many barriers in addressing community needs post-wildfire, including the policies governing access to and the slow arrival of recovery resources, the intertwined nature of community economic health and built environment restoration, and the challenge of forming a functional LTRO structure. However, participants also identified facilitators of LTROs' work, including the ability of LTROs and their government partners to adapt policies and procedures, and close collaboration with other community organizations. Factors both internal and external to the community and LTROs' organizational characteristics influence their ability to address community needs, essential to health, post-wildfire. This study's findings suggest the need for policy improvements to promote more equitable recovery resource access, that economic recovery should be a core LTRO function, and that recovery planning should be incorporated into community disaster preparedness activities. Future research should focus on LTROs' role in other contexts and in response to other disasters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental research, health : ERH\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"021009\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227461/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental research, health : ERH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/acd2f7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental research, health : ERH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/acd2f7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去几十年来,美国的野火活动有所增加,破坏了支持社区健康和恢复能力的系统和基础设施。预计野火造成的累积损失还会增加,因此了解有效的社区恢复过程至关重要。长期恢复组织(LTROs)是野火恢复的关键组成部分,通过对长期恢复组织领导人的定性访谈,我们探讨了长期恢复组织支持农村社区野火后需求的能力所面临的障碍和促进因素。2022 年 2 月至 5 月间,我们对来自华盛顿州、俄勒冈州和加利福尼亚州的六个长期恢复组织的 18 名领导者进行了调查和半结构化访谈,这些组织在 2015-2020 年间为受野火影响的农村社区提供服务。罗伯特-伍德-约翰逊基金会的 "健康文化框架 "为半结构式访谈指南和先验代码手册提供了参考,以考察 LTROs 从健康公平角度满足野火后社区需求的能力。通过归纳法增加了其他代码,并确定了新出现的主题。我们的研究结果表明,土地退化评估组织在解决野火后社区需求方面面临着许多障碍,包括获取恢复资源的政策和恢复资源的缓慢到达、社区经济健康和建筑环境恢复的相互交织性质,以及形成一个功能性土地退化评估组织结构所面临的挑战。不过,与会者也指出了促进 LTRO 工作的因素,包括 LTRO 及其政府合作伙伴调整政策和程序的能力,以及与其他社区组织的密切合作。社区内部和外部的因素以及 LTROs 的组织特征都影响着他们在野火后满足社区需求的能力,而这些需求对健康至关重要。本研究的结果表明,需要改进政策以促进更公平的恢复资源获取,经济恢复应成为 LTRO 的核心职能,恢复规划应纳入社区备灾活动。未来的研究应重点关注 LTRO 在其他情况下和应对其他灾害时的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
After the fire: A qualitative study of the role of long-term recovery organizations in addressing rural communities' post-wildfire needs.

U.S. wildfire activity has increased over the past several decades, disrupting the systems and infrastructure that support community health and resilience. As the cumulative burden of wildfire damage is projected to increase, understanding an effective community recovery process is critically important. Through qualitative interviews with leaders of long-term recovery organizations (LTROs), a key component of wildfire recovery, we explored barriers and facilitators to LTROs' ability to support post-wildfire needs among rural communities. Between February-May 2022, we conducted surveys and semi-structured interviews with 18 leaders from six LTROs serving rural communities in Washington, Oregon, and California impacted by wildfires between 2015-2020. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Culture of Health Framework informed the semi-structured interview guide and a priori codebook, to examine LTROs' ability to address post-wildfire community needs from a health equity perspective. Additional codes were added through an inductive approach, and emerging themes were identified. Our findings indicate that LTROs face many barriers in addressing community needs post-wildfire, including the policies governing access to and the slow arrival of recovery resources, the intertwined nature of community economic health and built environment restoration, and the challenge of forming a functional LTRO structure. However, participants also identified facilitators of LTROs' work, including the ability of LTROs and their government partners to adapt policies and procedures, and close collaboration with other community organizations. Factors both internal and external to the community and LTROs' organizational characteristics influence their ability to address community needs, essential to health, post-wildfire. This study's findings suggest the need for policy improvements to promote more equitable recovery resource access, that economic recovery should be a core LTRO function, and that recovery planning should be incorporated into community disaster preparedness activities. Future research should focus on LTROs' role in other contexts and in response to other disasters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emergency department visits in California associated with wildfire PM2.5: differing risk across individuals and communities. Gestational and postnatal exposure to wildfire smoke and prolonged use of respiratory medications in early life. Association of ambient air pollution and pesticide mixtures on respiratory inflammatory markers in agricultural communities. Critical windows of greenness exposure during preconception and gestational periods in association with birthweight outcomes The synergistic health impacts of exposure to multiple stressors in Tulare County, California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1