对 Hansen Wheat 等人的回应:额外的分析进一步证实,与更多接触人类的狼相比,狗更早出现合作交流。

IF 1.9 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Learning & Behavior Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-21 DOI:10.3758/s13420-023-00576-2
Hannah Salomons, Kyle C M Smith, Megan Callahan-Beckel, Margaret Callahan, Kerinne Levy, Brenda S Kennedy, Emily E Bray, Gitanjali E Gnanadesikan, Daniel J Horschler, Margaret Gruen, Jingzhi Tan, Philip White, Bridgett M vonHoldt, Evan L MacLean, Brian Hare
{"title":"对 Hansen Wheat 等人的回应:额外的分析进一步证实,与更多接触人类的狼相比,狗更早出现合作交流。","authors":"Hannah Salomons, Kyle C M Smith, Megan Callahan-Beckel, Margaret Callahan, Kerinne Levy, Brenda S Kennedy, Emily E Bray, Gitanjali E Gnanadesikan, Daniel J Horschler, Margaret Gruen, Jingzhi Tan, Philip White, Bridgett M vonHoldt, Evan L MacLean, Brian Hare","doi":"10.3758/s13420-023-00576-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Here, we address Hansen Wheat et al.'s commentary in this journal in response to Salomons et al. Current Biology, 31(14), 3137-3144.E11, (2021). We conduct additional analyses in response to Hansen Wheat et al.'s two main questions. First, we examine the claim that it was the move to a human home environment which enabled the dog puppies to outperform the wolf puppies in gesture comprehension tasks. We show that the youngest dog puppies who had not yet been individually placed in raisers' homes were still highly skilled, and outperformed similar-aged wolf puppies who had higher levels of human interaction. Second, we address the claim that willingness to approach a stranger can explain the difference between dog and wolf pups' ability to succeed in gesture comprehension tasks. We explain the various controls in the original study that render this explanation insufficient, and demonstrate via model comparison that the covariance of species and temperament also make this parsing impossible. Overall, our additional analyses and considerations support the domestication hypothesis as laid out by Salomons et al. Current Biology, 31(14), 3137-3144.E11, (2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":49914,"journal":{"name":"Learning & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to Hansen Wheat et al.: Additional analysis further supports the early emergence of cooperative communication in dogs compared to wolves raised with more human exposure.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Salomons, Kyle C M Smith, Megan Callahan-Beckel, Margaret Callahan, Kerinne Levy, Brenda S Kennedy, Emily E Bray, Gitanjali E Gnanadesikan, Daniel J Horschler, Margaret Gruen, Jingzhi Tan, Philip White, Bridgett M vonHoldt, Evan L MacLean, Brian Hare\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13420-023-00576-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Here, we address Hansen Wheat et al.'s commentary in this journal in response to Salomons et al. Current Biology, 31(14), 3137-3144.E11, (2021). We conduct additional analyses in response to Hansen Wheat et al.'s two main questions. First, we examine the claim that it was the move to a human home environment which enabled the dog puppies to outperform the wolf puppies in gesture comprehension tasks. We show that the youngest dog puppies who had not yet been individually placed in raisers' homes were still highly skilled, and outperformed similar-aged wolf puppies who had higher levels of human interaction. Second, we address the claim that willingness to approach a stranger can explain the difference between dog and wolf pups' ability to succeed in gesture comprehension tasks. We explain the various controls in the original study that render this explanation insufficient, and demonstrate via model comparison that the covariance of species and temperament also make this parsing impossible. Overall, our additional analyses and considerations support the domestication hypothesis as laid out by Salomons et al. Current Biology, 31(14), 3137-3144.E11, (2021).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning & Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-023-00576-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-023-00576-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在此,我们对 Hansen Wheat 等人在本刊上针对 Salomons 等人在 Current Biology, 31(14), 3137-3144.E11, (2021) 发表的评论做出回应。针对 Hansen Wheat 等人提出的两个主要问题,我们进行了补充分析。首先,我们研究了狗幼犬在手势理解任务中胜过狼幼犬的原因是移居人类家庭环境这一说法。我们的研究表明,尚未被单独安置在饲养者家中的幼犬仍然非常熟练,它们的表现优于与人类互动程度较高的同龄幼狼。其次,我们讨论了 "接近陌生人的意愿 "可以解释幼犬和幼狼在手势理解任务中的能力差异这一说法。我们解释了原始研究中导致这种解释不充分的各种控制因素,并通过模型比较证明,物种和性情的协方差也使这种解析变得不可能。总之,我们的补充分析和考虑支持 Salomons 等人提出的驯化假说,《当代生物学》,31(14), 3137-3144.E11, (2021)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response to Hansen Wheat et al.: Additional analysis further supports the early emergence of cooperative communication in dogs compared to wolves raised with more human exposure.

Here, we address Hansen Wheat et al.'s commentary in this journal in response to Salomons et al. Current Biology, 31(14), 3137-3144.E11, (2021). We conduct additional analyses in response to Hansen Wheat et al.'s two main questions. First, we examine the claim that it was the move to a human home environment which enabled the dog puppies to outperform the wolf puppies in gesture comprehension tasks. We show that the youngest dog puppies who had not yet been individually placed in raisers' homes were still highly skilled, and outperformed similar-aged wolf puppies who had higher levels of human interaction. Second, we address the claim that willingness to approach a stranger can explain the difference between dog and wolf pups' ability to succeed in gesture comprehension tasks. We explain the various controls in the original study that render this explanation insufficient, and demonstrate via model comparison that the covariance of species and temperament also make this parsing impossible. Overall, our additional analyses and considerations support the domestication hypothesis as laid out by Salomons et al. Current Biology, 31(14), 3137-3144.E11, (2021).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning & Behavior
Learning & Behavior 医学-动物学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Learning & Behavior publishes experimental and theoretical contributions and critical reviews concerning fundamental processes of learning and behavior in nonhuman and human animals. Topics covered include sensation, perception, conditioning, learning, attention, memory, motivation, emotion, development, social behavior, and comparative investigations.
期刊最新文献
Divergence in bonobo and chimpanzee social life. Early-life group size influences response inhibition, but not the learning of it, in Japanese quails. Why might animals remember? A functional framework for episodic memory research in comparative psychology Sexual selection for single song repertoires Measuring spontaneous episodic future thinking in children: Challenges and opportunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1