随机临床试验中BRAF/MEK靶向治疗BRAF突变型黑色素瘤妇女的疗效改善。系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Seminars in oncology Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2023.03.003
Laura Pala , Tommaso De Pas , Eleonora Pagan , Saverio Minucci , Chiara Catania , Nunzio Digiacomo , Emilia Cocorocchio , Daniele Laszlo , Antonio Di Muzio , Chiara Barigazzi , Erika Stucchi , Laura De Grandi , Sara Stucchi , Giuseppe Viale , Richard D. Gelber , Vincenzo Bagnardi , Fabio Conforti
{"title":"随机临床试验中BRAF/MEK靶向治疗BRAF突变型黑色素瘤妇女的疗效改善。系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Laura Pala ,&nbsp;Tommaso De Pas ,&nbsp;Eleonora Pagan ,&nbsp;Saverio Minucci ,&nbsp;Chiara Catania ,&nbsp;Nunzio Digiacomo ,&nbsp;Emilia Cocorocchio ,&nbsp;Daniele Laszlo ,&nbsp;Antonio Di Muzio ,&nbsp;Chiara Barigazzi ,&nbsp;Erika Stucchi ,&nbsp;Laura De Grandi ,&nbsp;Sara Stucchi ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Viale ,&nbsp;Richard D. Gelber ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Bagnardi ,&nbsp;Fabio Conforti","doi":"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2023.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Available evidence suggests that in patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated with the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, gender could be associated with survival outcome. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, to assess the interaction between treatment effect and patients’ gender. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus, for phase II and III RCTs up to January 30, 2022. We included all RCTs that enrolled patients with BRAF V600-mutant advanced cutaneous melanoma and assessed combinations of BRAF and MEK inhibitors versus BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. Our aim was to assess differences if any in treatment efficacy between men and women, measured in terms of the differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) log-hazard ratios (log-HRs). We calculated the pooled PFS- and OS-HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in men and women using a random-effects model and assessed the heterogeneity between the estimates using an interaction test. Five RCTs that enrolled a total of 2,113 patients were included in the analysis. In women, the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors halved the risk of progression or death as compared with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy with a pooled PFS-HR of 0.50 (95%CI 0.41–0.61). In men, the benefit obtained with BRAF and MEK inhibitors was smaller with a pooled PFS-HR of 0.63 (95%CI 0.54–0.74), <em>P</em>-heterogeneity = .05. A similar trend was observed for OS where the pooled OS-HR was 0.62 (95%CI 0.48–0.80) in women and only 0.78, (95%CI 0.67–0.92) in men, <em>P</em>-heterogeneity = 0.11. These results support meaningful gender-based heterogeneity of response to combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors targeted therapy in patients with advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma, that should be considered in future research to improve treatment effectiveness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21750,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in oncology","volume":"50 1","pages":"Pages 34-39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved outcomes in women with BRAF-mutant melanoma treated with BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy across randomized clinical trials. A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Laura Pala ,&nbsp;Tommaso De Pas ,&nbsp;Eleonora Pagan ,&nbsp;Saverio Minucci ,&nbsp;Chiara Catania ,&nbsp;Nunzio Digiacomo ,&nbsp;Emilia Cocorocchio ,&nbsp;Daniele Laszlo ,&nbsp;Antonio Di Muzio ,&nbsp;Chiara Barigazzi ,&nbsp;Erika Stucchi ,&nbsp;Laura De Grandi ,&nbsp;Sara Stucchi ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Viale ,&nbsp;Richard D. Gelber ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Bagnardi ,&nbsp;Fabio Conforti\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2023.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Available evidence suggests that in patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated with the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, gender could be associated with survival outcome. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, to assess the interaction between treatment effect and patients’ gender. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus, for phase II and III RCTs up to January 30, 2022. We included all RCTs that enrolled patients with BRAF V600-mutant advanced cutaneous melanoma and assessed combinations of BRAF and MEK inhibitors versus BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. Our aim was to assess differences if any in treatment efficacy between men and women, measured in terms of the differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) log-hazard ratios (log-HRs). We calculated the pooled PFS- and OS-HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in men and women using a random-effects model and assessed the heterogeneity between the estimates using an interaction test. Five RCTs that enrolled a total of 2,113 patients were included in the analysis. In women, the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors halved the risk of progression or death as compared with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy with a pooled PFS-HR of 0.50 (95%CI 0.41–0.61). In men, the benefit obtained with BRAF and MEK inhibitors was smaller with a pooled PFS-HR of 0.63 (95%CI 0.54–0.74), <em>P</em>-heterogeneity = .05. A similar trend was observed for OS where the pooled OS-HR was 0.62 (95%CI 0.48–0.80) in women and only 0.78, (95%CI 0.67–0.92) in men, <em>P</em>-heterogeneity = 0.11. These results support meaningful gender-based heterogeneity of response to combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors targeted therapy in patients with advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma, that should be considered in future research to improve treatment effectiveness.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in oncology\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 34-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093775423000362\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093775423000362","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有证据表明,在接受BRAF和MEK抑制剂联合治疗的晚期BRAF V600突变黑色素瘤患者中,性别可能与生存结果有关。我们对所有测试BRAF和MEK抑制剂组合的随机临床试验(RCT)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估治疗效果与患者性别之间的相互作用。我们搜索了PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase和Scopus,寻找截至2022年1月30日的II期和III期随机对照试验。我们纳入了所有入选BRAF V600突变晚期皮肤黑色素瘤患者的随机对照试验,并评估了BRAF和MEK抑制剂的组合与BRAF抑制剂单一疗法的对比。我们的目的是评估男性和女性之间治疗效果的差异(如果有的话),以无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)对数风险比(log HR)的差异来衡量。我们使用随机效应模型计算了男性和女性95%置信区间(CI)的合并PFS和OS HR,并使用交互作用测试评估了估计值之间的异质性。共纳入2113名患者的5项随机对照试验被纳入分析。在女性中,与合并PFS-HR为0.50(95%CI 0.41–0.61)的BRAF抑制剂单药治疗相比,BRAF和MEK抑制剂的联合治疗将进展或死亡风险减半。在男性中,合并PFS-HR为0.63(95%CI 0.54–0.74)的BRAF和MEK抑剂获得的益处较小,P异质性 = .05.OS也有类似的趋势,女性合并OS-HR为0.62(95%CI 0.48-0.80),男性仅为0.78(95%CI 0.67-0.92),P异质性 = 0.11.这些结果支持晚期BRAF突变型黑色素瘤患者对BRAF和MEK抑制剂联合靶向治疗的有意义的基于性别的异质性反应,应在未来的研究中考虑这一点,以提高治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improved outcomes in women with BRAF-mutant melanoma treated with BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy across randomized clinical trials. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Available evidence suggests that in patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated with the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, gender could be associated with survival outcome. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, to assess the interaction between treatment effect and patients’ gender. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus, for phase II and III RCTs up to January 30, 2022. We included all RCTs that enrolled patients with BRAF V600-mutant advanced cutaneous melanoma and assessed combinations of BRAF and MEK inhibitors versus BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. Our aim was to assess differences if any in treatment efficacy between men and women, measured in terms of the differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) log-hazard ratios (log-HRs). We calculated the pooled PFS- and OS-HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in men and women using a random-effects model and assessed the heterogeneity between the estimates using an interaction test. Five RCTs that enrolled a total of 2,113 patients were included in the analysis. In women, the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors halved the risk of progression or death as compared with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy with a pooled PFS-HR of 0.50 (95%CI 0.41–0.61). In men, the benefit obtained with BRAF and MEK inhibitors was smaller with a pooled PFS-HR of 0.63 (95%CI 0.54–0.74), P-heterogeneity = .05. A similar trend was observed for OS where the pooled OS-HR was 0.62 (95%CI 0.48–0.80) in women and only 0.78, (95%CI 0.67–0.92) in men, P-heterogeneity = 0.11. These results support meaningful gender-based heterogeneity of response to combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors targeted therapy in patients with advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma, that should be considered in future research to improve treatment effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in oncology
Seminars in oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
104 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology brings you current, authoritative, and practical reviews of developments in the etiology, diagnosis and management of cancer. Each issue examines topics of clinical importance, with an emphasis on providing both the basic knowledge needed to better understand a topic as well as evidence-based opinions from leaders in the field. Seminars in Oncology also seeks to be a venue for sharing a diversity of opinions including those that might be considered "outside the box". We welcome a healthy and respectful exchange of opinions and urge you to approach us with your insights as well as suggestions of topics that you deem worthy of coverage. By helping the reader understand the basic biology and the therapy of cancer as they learn the nuances from experts, all in a journal that encourages the exchange of ideas we aim to help move the treatment of cancer forward.
期刊最新文献
Adenocarcinoma on retrorectal cystic hamartoma: An illustrative image for a very rare diagnosis. Efficacy of metformin drug in preventing metabolic syndrome associated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Screening Adherence for Second Primary Malignancies in Breast Cancer Survivors: Behaviors, Facilitators, and Barriers to Enhance Quality Care. Deep Myometrial Infiltration leads to a measurable Inflammatory Response in Endometrial Cancer. A Prospective Observational Study. Colorectal cancer in Ethiopia: Epidemiological trends, diagnostic and laboratory capacities, and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1