激光照射牙龈组织的Verhoeff van Gieson染色。

Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1080/01478885.2023.2193527
Joseph A Esposito, Nathan Estrin, Steve A McClain, Wei Hou, Georgios E Romanos
{"title":"激光照射牙龈组织的Verhoeff van Gieson染色。","authors":"Joseph A Esposito,&nbsp;Nathan Estrin,&nbsp;Steve A McClain,&nbsp;Wei Hou,&nbsp;Georgios E Romanos","doi":"10.1080/01478885.2023.2193527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There have been several studies on the use of the Verhoeff van Gieson staining method to demonstrate thermal effects on tissues. However, this method has rarely been used for the analysis of periodontal tissues. This study was undertaken to compare the quality and effectiveness of the Verhoeff van Gieson (VVG) staining method with conventional hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) in measuring the thermal effects in gingival tissues. Periodontal tissues around bovine mandibular teeth were treated using different surgical lasers (wavelengths of 10,600 nm, 970 nm, and 445 nm) at 2 W power setting. Measurements of the depth of the coagulation zone were recorded for all treatment groups in sample tissues stained with H&E as well as the VVG-staining method. Measures were interpreted by a trained pathologist. A statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to determine if there was a statistically significant difference between values recorded for the light penetration depth on tissues stained with each of the two staining methods. It was determined that there was no significant difference in the recorded values (<i>P</i> = 0.23). We have concluded that the VVG-stained tissues were better able to visualize the depth of thermal damage and thus may make it easier for someone not well trained to interpret the depth of light penetration in these tissues.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verhoeff van Gieson staining in laser-irradiated gingival tissues.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph A Esposito,&nbsp;Nathan Estrin,&nbsp;Steve A McClain,&nbsp;Wei Hou,&nbsp;Georgios E Romanos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01478885.2023.2193527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There have been several studies on the use of the Verhoeff van Gieson staining method to demonstrate thermal effects on tissues. However, this method has rarely been used for the analysis of periodontal tissues. This study was undertaken to compare the quality and effectiveness of the Verhoeff van Gieson (VVG) staining method with conventional hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) in measuring the thermal effects in gingival tissues. Periodontal tissues around bovine mandibular teeth were treated using different surgical lasers (wavelengths of 10,600 nm, 970 nm, and 445 nm) at 2 W power setting. Measurements of the depth of the coagulation zone were recorded for all treatment groups in sample tissues stained with H&E as well as the VVG-staining method. Measures were interpreted by a trained pathologist. A statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to determine if there was a statistically significant difference between values recorded for the light penetration depth on tissues stained with each of the two staining methods. It was determined that there was no significant difference in the recorded values (<i>P</i> = 0.23). We have concluded that the VVG-stained tissues were better able to visualize the depth of thermal damage and thus may make it easier for someone not well trained to interpret the depth of light penetration in these tissues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01478885.2023.2193527\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01478885.2023.2193527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已有几项研究使用范吉森染色法来证明热效应对组织的影响。然而,这种方法很少用于牙周组织的分析。本研究比较了Verhoeff van Gieson (VVG)染色法与传统苏木精伊红(H&E)染色法测量牙龈组织热效应的质量和有效性。采用波长分别为10600 nm、970 nm和445 nm、功率为2w的激光治疗牛下颌骨周围的牙周组织。记录所有处理组在H&E染色和vvg染色法染色的样本组织中凝血区深度的测量。测量结果由训练有素的病理学家解释。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行统计分析,以确定用两种染色方法染色的组织的光穿透深度记录值之间是否存在统计学显著差异。经测定,记录值无显著差异(P = 0.23)。我们的结论是,vvg染色的组织能够更好地可视化热损伤的深度,因此可能使没有受过良好训练的人更容易解释这些组织中的光穿透深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Verhoeff van Gieson staining in laser-irradiated gingival tissues.

There have been several studies on the use of the Verhoeff van Gieson staining method to demonstrate thermal effects on tissues. However, this method has rarely been used for the analysis of periodontal tissues. This study was undertaken to compare the quality and effectiveness of the Verhoeff van Gieson (VVG) staining method with conventional hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) in measuring the thermal effects in gingival tissues. Periodontal tissues around bovine mandibular teeth were treated using different surgical lasers (wavelengths of 10,600 nm, 970 nm, and 445 nm) at 2 W power setting. Measurements of the depth of the coagulation zone were recorded for all treatment groups in sample tissues stained with H&E as well as the VVG-staining method. Measures were interpreted by a trained pathologist. A statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to determine if there was a statistically significant difference between values recorded for the light penetration depth on tissues stained with each of the two staining methods. It was determined that there was no significant difference in the recorded values (P = 0.23). We have concluded that the VVG-stained tissues were better able to visualize the depth of thermal damage and thus may make it easier for someone not well trained to interpret the depth of light penetration in these tissues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1