世界卫生组织大学生生活质量--BREF 问卷的心理测量特性。

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Journal of nursing measurement Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1891/JNM-2022-0062
Lynne A Hall, S Lee Ridner, Timothy N Crawford
{"title":"世界卫生组织大学生生活质量--BREF 问卷的心理测量特性。","authors":"Lynne A Hall, S Lee Ridner, Timothy N Crawford","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2022-0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Because there are conflicting perspectives on the factor structure of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) Questionnaire among college students, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the instrument in a sample of U.S. college students. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted secondary analysis of data collected from 1,138 undergraduate students from a large metropolitan university in the southeastern United States. <b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis did not support the original 4-factor structure. Based on exploratory factor analysis, three factors were retained and rotated using Varimax rotation, which accounted for 96% of the item variance. Coefficient alphas for the factors were: social/psychological health, 0.84; physical health, 0.81; and environment, 0.77. Sexual minorities had significantly lower scores on all factors than those who identified as heterosexuals. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this sample of college students, the WHOQOL-BREF was three-dimensional, and a significant amount of the item variance was explained. Lower quality of life scores of nonWhites and sexual minority college students point to a critical need that should be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":"256-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Psychometric Properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF Questionnaire in College Students.\",\"authors\":\"Lynne A Hall, S Lee Ridner, Timothy N Crawford\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JNM-2022-0062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Because there are conflicting perspectives on the factor structure of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) Questionnaire among college students, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the instrument in a sample of U.S. college students. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted secondary analysis of data collected from 1,138 undergraduate students from a large metropolitan university in the southeastern United States. <b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis did not support the original 4-factor structure. Based on exploratory factor analysis, three factors were retained and rotated using Varimax rotation, which accounted for 96% of the item variance. Coefficient alphas for the factors were: social/psychological health, 0.84; physical health, 0.81; and environment, 0.77. Sexual minorities had significantly lower scores on all factors than those who identified as heterosexuals. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this sample of college students, the WHOQOL-BREF was three-dimensional, and a significant amount of the item variance was explained. Lower quality of life scores of nonWhites and sexual minority college students point to a critical need that should be addressed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nursing measurement\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"256-266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nursing measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2022-0062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2022-0062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:由于大学生对世界卫生组织生活质量--BREF(WHOQOL-BREF)问卷的因子结构存在不同看法,我们以美国大学生为样本,对该问卷的心理测量特性进行了评估。方法:我们对从美国东南部一所大都市大学的 1138 名本科生中收集到的数据进行了二次分析。结果:确认性因素分析并不支持该问卷:确认性因子分析不支持最初的 4 因子结构。在探索性因子分析的基础上,保留了三个因子,并使用Varimax旋转法进行旋转,这三个因子占项目方差的96%。这些因子的系数分别为:社会/心理健康,0.84;身体健康,0.81;环境,0.77。性少数群体在所有因子上的得分都明显低于那些被认定为异性恋的人。结论:在这一大学生样本中,WHOQOL-BREF 是三维的,有很大一部分项目方差是可以解释的。非白种人和性少数群体大学生较低的生活质量得分表明,他们的生活质量亟待提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Psychometric Properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF Questionnaire in College Students.

Background and Purpose: Because there are conflicting perspectives on the factor structure of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) Questionnaire among college students, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the instrument in a sample of U.S. college students. Methods: We conducted secondary analysis of data collected from 1,138 undergraduate students from a large metropolitan university in the southeastern United States. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis did not support the original 4-factor structure. Based on exploratory factor analysis, three factors were retained and rotated using Varimax rotation, which accounted for 96% of the item variance. Coefficient alphas for the factors were: social/psychological health, 0.84; physical health, 0.81; and environment, 0.77. Sexual minorities had significantly lower scores on all factors than those who identified as heterosexuals. Conclusions: In this sample of college students, the WHOQOL-BREF was three-dimensional, and a significant amount of the item variance was explained. Lower quality of life scores of nonWhites and sexual minority college students point to a critical need that should be addressed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Measurement specifically addresses instrumentation in nursing. It serves as a prime forum for disseminating information on instruments, tools, approaches, and procedures developed or utilized for measuring variables in nursing research, practice, and education. Particular emphasis is placed on evidence for the reliability and validity or sensitivity and specificity of such instruments. The journal includes innovative discussions of theories, principles, practices, and issues relevant to nursing measurement.
期刊最新文献
Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Moulage Authenticity Rating Scale and Proposed Adaptations. Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Foot Health Assessment Instrument in Pregnant Women. Instruments Important to Help Increase Diversity Equity and Inclusion. The Italian Version of the Ward Safety and Security Rules Survey for Mental Health Nurses: A Validity Study. Development of the Followership Evaluation Instrument for Nurses: A Prospective Longitudinal Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1