边缘型人格障碍的元认知人际治疗:climmithe研究的临床和神经影像学结果-一项随机临床试验。

Roberta Rossi, Daniele Corbo, Laura R Magni, Michela Pievani, Giuseppe Nicolò, Antonio Semerari, Giulia Quattrini, Ilaria Riccardi, Livia Colle, Laura Conti, Roberto Gasparotti, Ambra Macis, Clarissa Ferrari, Antonino Carcione
{"title":"边缘型人格障碍的元认知人际治疗:climmithe研究的临床和神经影像学结果-一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Roberta Rossi,&nbsp;Daniele Corbo,&nbsp;Laura R Magni,&nbsp;Michela Pievani,&nbsp;Giuseppe Nicolò,&nbsp;Antonio Semerari,&nbsp;Giulia Quattrini,&nbsp;Ilaria Riccardi,&nbsp;Livia Colle,&nbsp;Laura Conti,&nbsp;Roberto Gasparotti,&nbsp;Ambra Macis,&nbsp;Clarissa Ferrari,&nbsp;Antonino Carcione","doi":"10.1037/per0000621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Different psychotherapeutic approaches demonstrated their efficacy but the possible neurobiological mechanism underlying the effect of psychotherapy in borderline personality disorder (BPD) patients is poorly investigated. We assessed the effects of metacognitive interpersonal therapy (MIT) on BPD features and other dimensions compared to structured clinical management (SCM). We also assessed changes in amygdala activation by viewing emotional pictures after psychotherapy. One hundred forty-one patients were referred and 78 BPD outpatients were included and randomized to MIT or SCM. Primary outcome was emotional dysregulation assessed with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). We also assessed BPD symptomatology, number of PD criteria, metacognitive abilities, state-psychopathology, depression, impulsiveness, interpersonal functioning, and alexithymia. A subset of 60 patients underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging before and after 1 year of psychotherapy to assess amygdala activation by viewing standardized emotional pictures (secondary outcome). DERS scores decreased in both groups (time effect <i>p</i> < .001). The Cohen's <i>d</i> effect size for change (baseline posttreatment) on DERS was very large (<i>d</i> = 0.84) in MIT, and large (<i>d</i> = 0.76) in SCM. Both groups significantly improved in depressive symptoms, state-psychopathology, alexithymia, and interpersonal functioning. MIT showed larger effect on metacognitive functions than SCM (Time × Group <i>p</i> < .001). Both interventions showed a significant effect on BPD symptomatology although SCM group showed a larger decrease. On the contrary, MIT group showed larger decrease in impulsivity and number of PD criteria. Interestingly, both MIT and SCM modulated amygdala activation in BPD patients. MIT is a valid and effective psychotherapy for BPD with an impact on amygdala activation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metacognitive interpersonal therapy in borderline personality disorder: Clinical and neuroimaging outcomes from the CLIMAMITHE study-A randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Roberta Rossi,&nbsp;Daniele Corbo,&nbsp;Laura R Magni,&nbsp;Michela Pievani,&nbsp;Giuseppe Nicolò,&nbsp;Antonio Semerari,&nbsp;Giulia Quattrini,&nbsp;Ilaria Riccardi,&nbsp;Livia Colle,&nbsp;Laura Conti,&nbsp;Roberto Gasparotti,&nbsp;Ambra Macis,&nbsp;Clarissa Ferrari,&nbsp;Antonino Carcione\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/per0000621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Different psychotherapeutic approaches demonstrated their efficacy but the possible neurobiological mechanism underlying the effect of psychotherapy in borderline personality disorder (BPD) patients is poorly investigated. We assessed the effects of metacognitive interpersonal therapy (MIT) on BPD features and other dimensions compared to structured clinical management (SCM). We also assessed changes in amygdala activation by viewing emotional pictures after psychotherapy. One hundred forty-one patients were referred and 78 BPD outpatients were included and randomized to MIT or SCM. Primary outcome was emotional dysregulation assessed with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). We also assessed BPD symptomatology, number of PD criteria, metacognitive abilities, state-psychopathology, depression, impulsiveness, interpersonal functioning, and alexithymia. A subset of 60 patients underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging before and after 1 year of psychotherapy to assess amygdala activation by viewing standardized emotional pictures (secondary outcome). DERS scores decreased in both groups (time effect <i>p</i> < .001). The Cohen's <i>d</i> effect size for change (baseline posttreatment) on DERS was very large (<i>d</i> = 0.84) in MIT, and large (<i>d</i> = 0.76) in SCM. Both groups significantly improved in depressive symptoms, state-psychopathology, alexithymia, and interpersonal functioning. MIT showed larger effect on metacognitive functions than SCM (Time × Group <i>p</i> < .001). Both interventions showed a significant effect on BPD symptomatology although SCM group showed a larger decrease. On the contrary, MIT group showed larger decrease in impulsivity and number of PD criteria. Interestingly, both MIT and SCM modulated amygdala activation in BPD patients. MIT is a valid and effective psychotherapy for BPD with an impact on amygdala activation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000621\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

不同的心理治疗方法证明了它们的疗效,但心理治疗对边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者影响的可能的神经生物学机制尚不清楚。与结构化临床管理(SCM)相比,我们评估了元认知人际治疗(MIT)对BPD特征和其他维度的影响。我们还通过观看心理治疗后的情绪图片来评估杏仁核激活的变化。141名患者被纳入,78名BPD门诊患者被随机分配到MIT或SCM组。主要结局是用情绪调节困难量表(DERS)评估情绪失调。我们还评估了BPD的症状、PD标准的数量、元认知能力、状态精神病理学、抑郁、冲动、人际功能和述情障碍。60名患者在心理治疗前后分别接受了功能性磁共振成像,通过观看标准化的情绪图片来评估杏仁核的激活情况(次要结果)。两组患者的DERS评分均降低(时间效应p < 0.001)。在MIT中,DERS变化(基线治疗后)的Cohen's d效应量非常大(d = 0.84),在SCM中则很大(d = 0.76)。两组在抑郁症状、状态精神病理、述情障碍和人际功能方面均有显著改善。MIT对元认知功能的影响大于SCM(时间×组p < 0.001)。两种干预措施均对BPD症状有显著影响,但SCM组下降幅度更大。相反,MIT组在冲动性和PD标准数量上有较大的下降。有趣的是,MIT和SCM都能调节BPD患者的杏仁核激活。MIT是一种有效的治疗BPD的方法,对杏仁核激活有影响。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Metacognitive interpersonal therapy in borderline personality disorder: Clinical and neuroimaging outcomes from the CLIMAMITHE study-A randomized clinical trial.

Different psychotherapeutic approaches demonstrated their efficacy but the possible neurobiological mechanism underlying the effect of psychotherapy in borderline personality disorder (BPD) patients is poorly investigated. We assessed the effects of metacognitive interpersonal therapy (MIT) on BPD features and other dimensions compared to structured clinical management (SCM). We also assessed changes in amygdala activation by viewing emotional pictures after psychotherapy. One hundred forty-one patients were referred and 78 BPD outpatients were included and randomized to MIT or SCM. Primary outcome was emotional dysregulation assessed with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). We also assessed BPD symptomatology, number of PD criteria, metacognitive abilities, state-psychopathology, depression, impulsiveness, interpersonal functioning, and alexithymia. A subset of 60 patients underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging before and after 1 year of psychotherapy to assess amygdala activation by viewing standardized emotional pictures (secondary outcome). DERS scores decreased in both groups (time effect p < .001). The Cohen's d effect size for change (baseline posttreatment) on DERS was very large (d = 0.84) in MIT, and large (d = 0.76) in SCM. Both groups significantly improved in depressive symptoms, state-psychopathology, alexithymia, and interpersonal functioning. MIT showed larger effect on metacognitive functions than SCM (Time × Group p < .001). Both interventions showed a significant effect on BPD symptomatology although SCM group showed a larger decrease. On the contrary, MIT group showed larger decrease in impulsivity and number of PD criteria. Interestingly, both MIT and SCM modulated amygdala activation in BPD patients. MIT is a valid and effective psychotherapy for BPD with an impact on amygdala activation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
First psychometric evaluation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 in adolescents. Peer support for borderline personality disorder: A critical review of its feasibility, acceptability, and alignment with concepts of recovery. Investigating the transdiagnostic potential of rumination in relation to Cluster B personality disorder symptoms. An evaluation of measurement invariance of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition borderline personality disorder criteria across heterosexual, lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Identity disturbance in dimensional and categorical models of personality disorder: The incremental value of self-rated identity and narrative identity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1