基于问题的学习中的知识建构:对教师和学生话语行动的滞后-顺序分析》(A Lag-Sequential Analysis of Teachers and Students' Discourse Moves.

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Teaching and Learning in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-06 DOI:10.1080/10401334.2023.2230559
Binbin Zheng, Qing He, Junru Lei
{"title":"基于问题的学习中的知识建构:对教师和学生话语行动的滞后-顺序分析》(A Lag-Sequential Analysis of Teachers and Students' Discourse Moves.","authors":"Binbin Zheng, Qing He, Junru Lei","doi":"10.1080/10401334.2023.2230559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Phenomenon</i>:</b> Problem-based learning (PBL) has been widely adopted in medical schools across the globe. However, the dynamics of discourse moves in time sequences during such learning remain underexplored. This study investigated discourse moves used by PBL tutors and tutees to facilitate collaborative knowledge construction, and adopted sequential analysis to unpack the temporal dynamics of such moves during PBL knowledge construction in an Asian context. <b><i>Approach</i>:</b> This study's sample comprised 22 first-year medical students and two PBL tutors at an Asian medical school. Two 2-h PBL tutorials were video-recorded and transcribed, and notes were made about the participants' non-verbal behaviors, including but not limited to body language and technology use. Descriptive statistics and visual representations were used to discern participation patterns as they evolved over time, and discourse analysis was applied to identify specific types of teacher and student discourse moves within knowledge construction. Lastly, lag-sequential analysis (LSA) was adopted to understand the sequential patterns of those discourse moves. <b><i>Findings</i>:</b> The PBL tutors mainly used probing questions, explanation and clarification, compliments, encouragement, affirmation, and requests when facilitating PBL discussions. LSA revealed that discourse moves had the following four major paths. Teachers' content-related questions elicited both lower- and higher-level thinking from students; teachers' statements mediated between students' thinking levels and teachers' questions; there were relationships among teachers' social-facilitation discourse, students' thinking modes, and teachers' statements; and there was a sequential relationship among teachers' statements, students' facilitation, teachers' process-related discourse, and students' silences. <b><i>Insights</i>:</b> This study revealed the importance of using probing questions to facilitate students' knowledge construction as they proceeded from lower- to higher-level thinking. This study also fills a gap in the current literature by adopting the innovative LSA methodology to explore teachers' and students' discourse move sequences in PBL. The results have important practical implications for PBL tutors regarding when and how to facilitate their students' collaborative knowledge construction.</p>","PeriodicalId":51183,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"411-424"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge Construction in Problem-Based Learning: A Lag-Sequential Analysis of Teachers' and Students' Discourse Moves.\",\"authors\":\"Binbin Zheng, Qing He, Junru Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10401334.2023.2230559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Phenomenon</i>:</b> Problem-based learning (PBL) has been widely adopted in medical schools across the globe. However, the dynamics of discourse moves in time sequences during such learning remain underexplored. This study investigated discourse moves used by PBL tutors and tutees to facilitate collaborative knowledge construction, and adopted sequential analysis to unpack the temporal dynamics of such moves during PBL knowledge construction in an Asian context. <b><i>Approach</i>:</b> This study's sample comprised 22 first-year medical students and two PBL tutors at an Asian medical school. Two 2-h PBL tutorials were video-recorded and transcribed, and notes were made about the participants' non-verbal behaviors, including but not limited to body language and technology use. Descriptive statistics and visual representations were used to discern participation patterns as they evolved over time, and discourse analysis was applied to identify specific types of teacher and student discourse moves within knowledge construction. Lastly, lag-sequential analysis (LSA) was adopted to understand the sequential patterns of those discourse moves. <b><i>Findings</i>:</b> The PBL tutors mainly used probing questions, explanation and clarification, compliments, encouragement, affirmation, and requests when facilitating PBL discussions. LSA revealed that discourse moves had the following four major paths. Teachers' content-related questions elicited both lower- and higher-level thinking from students; teachers' statements mediated between students' thinking levels and teachers' questions; there were relationships among teachers' social-facilitation discourse, students' thinking modes, and teachers' statements; and there was a sequential relationship among teachers' statements, students' facilitation, teachers' process-related discourse, and students' silences. <b><i>Insights</i>:</b> This study revealed the importance of using probing questions to facilitate students' knowledge construction as they proceeded from lower- to higher-level thinking. This study also fills a gap in the current literature by adopting the innovative LSA methodology to explore teachers' and students' discourse move sequences in PBL. The results have important practical implications for PBL tutors regarding when and how to facilitate their students' collaborative knowledge construction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Learning in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"411-424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Learning in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2023.2230559\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2023.2230559","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现象:基于问题的学习(PBL)已在全球医学院校广泛采用。然而,在这种学习过程中,话语在时间序列中的动态变化仍未得到充分探索。本研究调查了 PBL 辅导教师和学员为促进协作式知识建构而使用的话语动作,并采用序列分析法来解读亚洲背景下 PBL 知识建构过程中此类动作的时间动态。研究方法:本研究的样本包括一所亚洲医学院的 22 名一年级医学生和两名 PBL 辅导教师。研究人员录制并转录了两堂 2 小时的 PBL 课程,并记录了参与者的非语言行为,包括但不限于肢体语言和技术使用。使用描述性统计和可视化表达来辨别随时间演变的参与模式,并应用话语分析来识别知识建构过程中教师和学生话语活动的具体类型。最后,采用滞后序列分析法(LSA)来了解这些话语动作的序列模式。研究结果在促进 PBL 讨论时,PBL 辅导教师主要使用探究性问题、解释和澄清、赞美、鼓励、肯定和请求。LSA 显示,话语移动有以下四种主要路径。教师与内容相关的问题引发了学生低层次和高层次的思考;教师的发言在学生的思考水平和教师的问题之间起到了中介作用;教师的社会促进话语、学生的思考模式和教师的发言之间存在关系;教师的发言、学生的促进、教师与过程相关的话语和学生的沉默之间存在顺序关系。启示本研究揭示了在学生从低级思维向高级思维发展的过程中,使用探究性问题促进学生知识建构的重要性。本研究还采用创新的 LSA 方法来探讨 PBL 中教师和学生的话语移动序列,从而填补了现有文献的空白。研究结果对于 PBL 辅导教师何时以及如何促进学生的协作性知识建构具有重要的现实意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowledge Construction in Problem-Based Learning: A Lag-Sequential Analysis of Teachers' and Students' Discourse Moves.

Phenomenon: Problem-based learning (PBL) has been widely adopted in medical schools across the globe. However, the dynamics of discourse moves in time sequences during such learning remain underexplored. This study investigated discourse moves used by PBL tutors and tutees to facilitate collaborative knowledge construction, and adopted sequential analysis to unpack the temporal dynamics of such moves during PBL knowledge construction in an Asian context. Approach: This study's sample comprised 22 first-year medical students and two PBL tutors at an Asian medical school. Two 2-h PBL tutorials were video-recorded and transcribed, and notes were made about the participants' non-verbal behaviors, including but not limited to body language and technology use. Descriptive statistics and visual representations were used to discern participation patterns as they evolved over time, and discourse analysis was applied to identify specific types of teacher and student discourse moves within knowledge construction. Lastly, lag-sequential analysis (LSA) was adopted to understand the sequential patterns of those discourse moves. Findings: The PBL tutors mainly used probing questions, explanation and clarification, compliments, encouragement, affirmation, and requests when facilitating PBL discussions. LSA revealed that discourse moves had the following four major paths. Teachers' content-related questions elicited both lower- and higher-level thinking from students; teachers' statements mediated between students' thinking levels and teachers' questions; there were relationships among teachers' social-facilitation discourse, students' thinking modes, and teachers' statements; and there was a sequential relationship among teachers' statements, students' facilitation, teachers' process-related discourse, and students' silences. Insights: This study revealed the importance of using probing questions to facilitate students' knowledge construction as they proceeded from lower- to higher-level thinking. This study also fills a gap in the current literature by adopting the innovative LSA methodology to explore teachers' and students' discourse move sequences in PBL. The results have important practical implications for PBL tutors regarding when and how to facilitate their students' collaborative knowledge construction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Teaching and Learning in Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Medicine ( TLM) is an international, forum for scholarship on teaching and learning in the health professions. Its international scope reflects the common challenge faced by all medical educators: fostering the development of capable, well-rounded, and continuous learners prepared to practice in a complex, high-stakes, and ever-changing clinical environment. TLM''s contributors and readership comprise behavioral scientists and health care practitioners, signaling the value of integrating diverse perspectives into a comprehensive understanding of learning and performance. The journal seeks to provide the theoretical foundations and practical analysis needed for effective educational decision making in such areas as admissions, instructional design and delivery, performance assessment, remediation, technology-assisted instruction, diversity management, and faculty development, among others. TLM''s scope includes all levels of medical education, from premedical to postgraduate and continuing medical education, with articles published in the following categories:
期刊最新文献
Policy analysis: an underutilised methodology in health professions education research. Psychometric properties of the Ethiopian national licensing exam in medicine: an analysis of multiple-choice questions using classical test theory. Disability Education for Health Personnel and Impact on Health Outcomes for Persons with Autism: A Scoping Review. Examining Scientific Inquiry of Queerness in Medical Education: A Queer Reading. "I have established this support network": How Chosen Kin Support Women Medical Students During their First Two Years in Medical School.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1