条纹草蛇(Natrix helvetica)和绿蛇(Anolis carolinensis)种内颅骨整合的高密度几何形态分析。

IF 2.2 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY Integrative Organismal Biology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1093/iob/obad022
S Tharakan, N Shepherd, D J Gower, E L Stanley, R N Felice, A Goswami, A Watanabe
{"title":"条纹草蛇(Natrix helvetica)和绿蛇(Anolis carolinensis)种内颅骨整合的高密度几何形态分析。","authors":"S Tharakan,&nbsp;N Shepherd,&nbsp;D J Gower,&nbsp;E L Stanley,&nbsp;R N Felice,&nbsp;A Goswami,&nbsp;A Watanabe","doi":"10.1093/iob/obad022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How do phenotypic associations intrinsic to an organism, such as developmental and mechanical processes, direct morphological evolution? Comparisons of intraspecific and clade-wide patterns of phenotypic covariation could inform how population-level trends ultimately dictate macroevolutionary changes. However, most studies have focused on analyzing integration and modularity either at macroevolutionary or intraspecific levels, without a shared analytical framework unifying these temporal scales. In this study, we investigate the intraspecific patterns of cranial integration in two squamate species: <i>Natrix helvetica</i> and <i>Anolis carolinensis</i>. We analyze their cranial integration patterns using the same high-density three-dimensional geometric morphometric approach used in a prior squamate-wide evolutionary study. Our results indicate that <i>Natrix</i> and <i>Anolis</i> exhibit shared intraspecific cranial integration patterns, with some differences, including a more integrated rostrum in the latter. Notably, these differences in intraspecific patterns correspond to their respective interspecific patterns in snakes and lizards, with few exceptions. These results suggest that interspecific patterns of cranial integration reflect intraspecific patterns. Hence, our study suggests that the phenotypic associations that direct morphological variation within species extend across micro- and macroevolutionary levels, bridging these two scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":13666,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Organismal Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311474/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-Density Geometric Morphometric Analysis of Intraspecific Cranial Integration in the Barred Grass Snake (<i>Natrix helvetica</i>) and Green Anole (<i>Anolis carolinensis</i>).\",\"authors\":\"S Tharakan,&nbsp;N Shepherd,&nbsp;D J Gower,&nbsp;E L Stanley,&nbsp;R N Felice,&nbsp;A Goswami,&nbsp;A Watanabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/iob/obad022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>How do phenotypic associations intrinsic to an organism, such as developmental and mechanical processes, direct morphological evolution? Comparisons of intraspecific and clade-wide patterns of phenotypic covariation could inform how population-level trends ultimately dictate macroevolutionary changes. However, most studies have focused on analyzing integration and modularity either at macroevolutionary or intraspecific levels, without a shared analytical framework unifying these temporal scales. In this study, we investigate the intraspecific patterns of cranial integration in two squamate species: <i>Natrix helvetica</i> and <i>Anolis carolinensis</i>. We analyze their cranial integration patterns using the same high-density three-dimensional geometric morphometric approach used in a prior squamate-wide evolutionary study. Our results indicate that <i>Natrix</i> and <i>Anolis</i> exhibit shared intraspecific cranial integration patterns, with some differences, including a more integrated rostrum in the latter. Notably, these differences in intraspecific patterns correspond to their respective interspecific patterns in snakes and lizards, with few exceptions. These results suggest that interspecific patterns of cranial integration reflect intraspecific patterns. Hence, our study suggests that the phenotypic associations that direct morphological variation within species extend across micro- and macroevolutionary levels, bridging these two scales.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Organismal Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311474/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Organismal Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obad022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Organismal Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obad022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个有机体内在的表型关联,如发育和机械过程,如何直接形态进化?比较种内和支系范围内的表型共变模式可以了解种群水平的趋势最终如何决定宏观进化变化。然而,大多数研究都集中在宏观进化或种内水平上分析集成和模块化,没有一个统一这些时间尺度的共享分析框架。在这项研究中,我们研究了两种鳞片动物物种:海胆和卡罗林山羊的种内颅骨整合模式。我们使用相同的高密度三维几何形态测量方法分析它们的颅骨整合模式,该方法用于先前的鳞片范围的进化研究。我们的研究结果表明,Natrix和Anolis表现出共同的种内颅骨整合模式,但存在一些差异,包括后者的更整合的讲台。值得注意的是,除了少数例外,这些种内模式的差异与蛇和蜥蜴各自的种间模式相对应。这些结果表明,颅整合的种间模式反映了种内模式。因此,我们的研究表明,物种内部直接形态变异的表型关联跨越微观和宏观进化水平,架起了这两个尺度的桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High-Density Geometric Morphometric Analysis of Intraspecific Cranial Integration in the Barred Grass Snake (Natrix helvetica) and Green Anole (Anolis carolinensis).

How do phenotypic associations intrinsic to an organism, such as developmental and mechanical processes, direct morphological evolution? Comparisons of intraspecific and clade-wide patterns of phenotypic covariation could inform how population-level trends ultimately dictate macroevolutionary changes. However, most studies have focused on analyzing integration and modularity either at macroevolutionary or intraspecific levels, without a shared analytical framework unifying these temporal scales. In this study, we investigate the intraspecific patterns of cranial integration in two squamate species: Natrix helvetica and Anolis carolinensis. We analyze their cranial integration patterns using the same high-density three-dimensional geometric morphometric approach used in a prior squamate-wide evolutionary study. Our results indicate that Natrix and Anolis exhibit shared intraspecific cranial integration patterns, with some differences, including a more integrated rostrum in the latter. Notably, these differences in intraspecific patterns correspond to their respective interspecific patterns in snakes and lizards, with few exceptions. These results suggest that interspecific patterns of cranial integration reflect intraspecific patterns. Hence, our study suggests that the phenotypic associations that direct morphological variation within species extend across micro- and macroevolutionary levels, bridging these two scales.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
48
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Raccoons Reveal Hidden Diversity in Trabecular Bone Development. Ocean Planning and Conservation in the Age of Climate Change: A Roundtable Discussion. Volumetric versus Element-scaling Mass Estimation and Its Application to Permo-Triassic Tetrapods. The Role of Polycystic Kidney Disease-Like Homologs in Planarian Nervous System Regeneration and Function. Risky Business: Predator Chemical Cues Mediate Morphological Changes in Freshwater Snails.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1