使用处方指标作为识别卫生社区之间丙戊酸处方流行率差异的手段:一项横断面研究。

Andrew Evans, Anne Hinchliffe, Kerenza Hood, Andrew Carson Stevens
{"title":"使用处方指标作为识别卫生社区之间丙戊酸处方流行率差异的手段:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Andrew Evans,&nbsp;Anne Hinchliffe,&nbsp;Kerenza Hood,&nbsp;Andrew Carson Stevens","doi":"10.1136/ihj-2019-000022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the appropriateness of valproate prescribing indicators in England and Wales as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate use among women and girls of childbearing potential between health communities.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Cross-sectional study using an ecological design using routinely published, publicly available valproate prescribing data for the period January to March 2019 and 2018 mid-year population estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In England and Wales, 87.7 people in every 1000 people prescribed valproate were women or girls aged 14-45 years (range 60.4-133.2). The prevalence of valproate use among all women and girls of childbearing age was 1.49 cases per 1000 women and girls aged 14-45 years (range 0.47-3.13). Considerable variation in prevalence was observed depending on which of two measures was used. The relative risk of exposure between health communities increased from 2.2 to 6.6 depending on the measure used, leading to the identification of different health communities being a priority for action. Wide variation was observed in the prevalence of valproate use among individuals other than women and girls aged 14-45 years (mean prevalence 3.89 cases per 1000 population, range 2.42-7.78). The prevalence of valproate use in all Clinical Commissioning Groups and Local Health Boards was lower in the at-risk population than in the rest of the population (p=0.046) with a strong positive correlation observed between the prevalence of valproate use in these two groups (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current indicators may lead to a failure to systematically review women and girls of childbearing age prescribed valproate. Urgent consideration should be given to changing the indicators used in England and Wales.</p>","PeriodicalId":73393,"journal":{"name":"Integrated healthcare journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"e000022"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/ihj-2019-000022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of prescribing indicators as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate prescribing between health communities: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Evans,&nbsp;Anne Hinchliffe,&nbsp;Kerenza Hood,&nbsp;Andrew Carson Stevens\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ihj-2019-000022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the appropriateness of valproate prescribing indicators in England and Wales as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate use among women and girls of childbearing potential between health communities.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Cross-sectional study using an ecological design using routinely published, publicly available valproate prescribing data for the period January to March 2019 and 2018 mid-year population estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In England and Wales, 87.7 people in every 1000 people prescribed valproate were women or girls aged 14-45 years (range 60.4-133.2). The prevalence of valproate use among all women and girls of childbearing age was 1.49 cases per 1000 women and girls aged 14-45 years (range 0.47-3.13). Considerable variation in prevalence was observed depending on which of two measures was used. The relative risk of exposure between health communities increased from 2.2 to 6.6 depending on the measure used, leading to the identification of different health communities being a priority for action. Wide variation was observed in the prevalence of valproate use among individuals other than women and girls aged 14-45 years (mean prevalence 3.89 cases per 1000 population, range 2.42-7.78). The prevalence of valproate use in all Clinical Commissioning Groups and Local Health Boards was lower in the at-risk population than in the rest of the population (p=0.046) with a strong positive correlation observed between the prevalence of valproate use in these two groups (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current indicators may lead to a failure to systematically review women and girls of childbearing age prescribed valproate. Urgent consideration should be given to changing the indicators used in England and Wales.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrated healthcare journal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"e000022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/ihj-2019-000022\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrated healthcare journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2019-000022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated healthcare journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2019-000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定英格兰和威尔士丙戊酸处方指标的适当性,作为确定卫生社区之间育龄妇女和女孩丙戊酸使用流行率差异的一种手段。方法和分析:采用生态设计的横断面研究,使用2019年1月至3月和2018年中期人口估计的常规发表的公开可获得的丙戊酸处方数据。结果:在英格兰和威尔士,每1000名丙戊酸处方患者中有87.7人是14-45岁的妇女或女孩(范围60.4-133.2)。所有育龄妇女和女童丙戊酸盐使用的流行率为每1000名14-45岁妇女和女童1.49例(范围0.47-3.13)。根据使用两种测量方法中的哪一种,观察到患病率有相当大的差异。卫生社区之间的相对暴露风险从2.2增加到6.6,这取决于所使用的措施,导致确定不同的卫生社区成为行动的优先事项。在14-45岁的妇女和女孩以外的个体中,丙戊酸盐的使用情况差异很大(平均患病率为每1000人3.89例,范围为2.42-7.78)。所有临床试运行组和地方卫生局的丙戊酸使用率在高危人群中低于其他人群(p=0.046),在这两组丙戊酸使用率之间观察到强烈的正相关(p结论:目前的指标可能导致未能系统地审查处方丙戊酸的育龄妇女和女孩。应紧急考虑改变英格兰和威尔士使用的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of prescribing indicators as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate prescribing between health communities: a cross-sectional study.

Objective: To determine the appropriateness of valproate prescribing indicators in England and Wales as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate use among women and girls of childbearing potential between health communities.

Methods and analysis: Cross-sectional study using an ecological design using routinely published, publicly available valproate prescribing data for the period January to March 2019 and 2018 mid-year population estimates.

Results: In England and Wales, 87.7 people in every 1000 people prescribed valproate were women or girls aged 14-45 years (range 60.4-133.2). The prevalence of valproate use among all women and girls of childbearing age was 1.49 cases per 1000 women and girls aged 14-45 years (range 0.47-3.13). Considerable variation in prevalence was observed depending on which of two measures was used. The relative risk of exposure between health communities increased from 2.2 to 6.6 depending on the measure used, leading to the identification of different health communities being a priority for action. Wide variation was observed in the prevalence of valproate use among individuals other than women and girls aged 14-45 years (mean prevalence 3.89 cases per 1000 population, range 2.42-7.78). The prevalence of valproate use in all Clinical Commissioning Groups and Local Health Boards was lower in the at-risk population than in the rest of the population (p=0.046) with a strong positive correlation observed between the prevalence of valproate use in these two groups (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Current indicators may lead to a failure to systematically review women and girls of childbearing age prescribed valproate. Urgent consideration should be given to changing the indicators used in England and Wales.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines. Picturing aesthetic futures: values and visual tools within shared decision-making. Role of an Integrated Care System during COVID-19 and beyond: a qualitative study with recommendations to inform future development. Correction: Effectiveness of integrated care interventions for patients with long-term conditions: a review of systematic reviews Equity in healthcare access and service coverage for older people: a scoping review of the conceptual literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1