Marta Revilla-León DDS, MSD, PhD , Elisabeth Fry , Achara Supaphakorn , Abdul B. Barmak MD, MSc, EdD , John C. Kois DDS, MSD
{"title":"用立体光刻机在不同印刷方向上制作树脂陶瓷冠的凹版表面的制造精度。","authors":"Marta Revilla-León DDS, MSD, PhD , Elisabeth Fry , Achara Supaphakorn , Abdul B. Barmak MD, MSc, EdD , John C. Kois DDS, MSD","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.04.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>Stereolithography (SLA) procedures can be chosen for manufacturing definitive crowns; however, how the print orientation impacts the trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the printed definitive restorations is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to calculate the manufacturing accuracy of the intaglio surface of SLA definitive resin-ceramic crowns fabricated at varying print orientations (0, 45, 75, or 90 degrees).</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>The standard tessellation language (STL) file of an anatomic contour molar crown was obtained and used to fabricate all the crowns by using a definitive resin-ceramic material (Permanent Crown) and an SLA printer (Form 3B+). Four groups were developed depending on the print orientation selected to manufacture the crowns: 0-, 45-, 70-, and 90-degree print orientation (n=30). Each crown specimen was digitized without the use of scanning powder by using a desktop scanner (T710). The crown design file was determined as the reference (control) group and used to calculate the fabricating trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the specimens using the root mean square (RMS) error computation. Trueness data were examined by using 1-way ANOVA and post hoc pairwise multiple comparison Tukey tests, while precision data were analyzed using the Levene test (α=.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean ±standard deviation RMS error discrepancies ranged from 37 ±3 μm to 113 ±11 μm. One-way ANOVA exposed significant trueness (<em>P</em><.001) differences among the groups considered in this study. Furthermore, all the print orientation groups tested were different from each other (<em>P</em><.001). The 0-degree group presented the best trueness value (37 μm), while the 90-degree group obtained the worst trueness value (113 μm). The Levene test exposed significant precision differences among the groups assessed (<em>P</em><.001). The 0-degree group had a significantly lower standard deviation (higher precision) (3 μm) than the other groups, with no difference among the other groups tested (<em>P</em>>.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The fabricating trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the SLA resin-ceramic crowns was impacted by the varying print orientations assessed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"133 2","pages":"Pages 505-511"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manufacturing accuracy of the intaglio surface of definitive resin-ceramic crowns fabricated at different print orientations by using a stereolithography printer\",\"authors\":\"Marta Revilla-León DDS, MSD, PhD , Elisabeth Fry , Achara Supaphakorn , Abdul B. Barmak MD, MSc, EdD , John C. Kois DDS, MSD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.04.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>Stereolithography (SLA) procedures can be chosen for manufacturing definitive crowns; however, how the print orientation impacts the trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the printed definitive restorations is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to calculate the manufacturing accuracy of the intaglio surface of SLA definitive resin-ceramic crowns fabricated at varying print orientations (0, 45, 75, or 90 degrees).</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>The standard tessellation language (STL) file of an anatomic contour molar crown was obtained and used to fabricate all the crowns by using a definitive resin-ceramic material (Permanent Crown) and an SLA printer (Form 3B+). Four groups were developed depending on the print orientation selected to manufacture the crowns: 0-, 45-, 70-, and 90-degree print orientation (n=30). Each crown specimen was digitized without the use of scanning powder by using a desktop scanner (T710). The crown design file was determined as the reference (control) group and used to calculate the fabricating trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the specimens using the root mean square (RMS) error computation. Trueness data were examined by using 1-way ANOVA and post hoc pairwise multiple comparison Tukey tests, while precision data were analyzed using the Levene test (α=.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean ±standard deviation RMS error discrepancies ranged from 37 ±3 μm to 113 ±11 μm. One-way ANOVA exposed significant trueness (<em>P</em><.001) differences among the groups considered in this study. Furthermore, all the print orientation groups tested were different from each other (<em>P</em><.001). The 0-degree group presented the best trueness value (37 μm), while the 90-degree group obtained the worst trueness value (113 μm). The Levene test exposed significant precision differences among the groups assessed (<em>P</em><.001). The 0-degree group had a significantly lower standard deviation (higher precision) (3 μm) than the other groups, with no difference among the other groups tested (<em>P</em>>.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The fabricating trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the SLA resin-ceramic crowns was impacted by the varying print orientations assessed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"133 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 505-511\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391323002676\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391323002676","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Manufacturing accuracy of the intaglio surface of definitive resin-ceramic crowns fabricated at different print orientations by using a stereolithography printer
Statement of problem
Stereolithography (SLA) procedures can be chosen for manufacturing definitive crowns; however, how the print orientation impacts the trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the printed definitive restorations is unclear.
Purpose
The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to calculate the manufacturing accuracy of the intaglio surface of SLA definitive resin-ceramic crowns fabricated at varying print orientations (0, 45, 75, or 90 degrees).
Material and methods
The standard tessellation language (STL) file of an anatomic contour molar crown was obtained and used to fabricate all the crowns by using a definitive resin-ceramic material (Permanent Crown) and an SLA printer (Form 3B+). Four groups were developed depending on the print orientation selected to manufacture the crowns: 0-, 45-, 70-, and 90-degree print orientation (n=30). Each crown specimen was digitized without the use of scanning powder by using a desktop scanner (T710). The crown design file was determined as the reference (control) group and used to calculate the fabricating trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the specimens using the root mean square (RMS) error computation. Trueness data were examined by using 1-way ANOVA and post hoc pairwise multiple comparison Tukey tests, while precision data were analyzed using the Levene test (α=.05).
Results
The mean ±standard deviation RMS error discrepancies ranged from 37 ±3 μm to 113 ±11 μm. One-way ANOVA exposed significant trueness (P<.001) differences among the groups considered in this study. Furthermore, all the print orientation groups tested were different from each other (P<.001). The 0-degree group presented the best trueness value (37 μm), while the 90-degree group obtained the worst trueness value (113 μm). The Levene test exposed significant precision differences among the groups assessed (P<.001). The 0-degree group had a significantly lower standard deviation (higher precision) (3 μm) than the other groups, with no difference among the other groups tested (P>.05).
Conclusions
The fabricating trueness and precision of the intaglio surface of the SLA resin-ceramic crowns was impacted by the varying print orientations assessed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.