在科学博物馆的在线展览中教授有争议的社会科学问题:现场的新冠肺炎。

Carolina Sotério, Adriele Ribeiro Dos Santos Lamim, Salete Linhares Queiroz
{"title":"在科学博物馆的在线展览中教授有争议的社会科学问题:现场的新冠肺炎。","authors":"Carolina Sotério,&nbsp;Adriele Ribeiro Dos Santos Lamim,&nbsp;Salete Linhares Queiroz","doi":"10.1186/s43031-022-00069-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Covid-19 pandemic has sparked an unprecedented public debate over socio-scientific controversies, particularly regarding vaccination and social distancing measures. Despite the potential of such subjects for developing critical thinking and a sense of citizenship, the theme of controversies is still incipient in science museums. This documentary study investigates the way three science institutions have proposed online exhibits on Covid-19 on Google Arts & Culture platform and checks their potential for favoring teaching on controversial science topics. Google Arts & Culture platform was searched for Covid-19-related keywords and the filtering of the results was based on focus and organizing institutions. Three exhibits were detected, whose analysis was submitted to an inter-rater agreement (Cohen's kappa). The results revealed the predominance of social and economic aspects that can strongly favor more scientifically progressive views of both science literacy and a socially undistorted science. On the other hand, the superficiality of political discussions on science topics, a lack of naturalization of the controversial discussions, and an excessive use of textual content were identified, thus revealing some initiatives have not explored the interactivity, multimediality, and the way dilemmas that mark the trajectory of science museums extend to online exhibits. From this perspective, we point out paths for teaching and learning socio-scientific controversies in museums.</p>","PeriodicalId":72822,"journal":{"name":"Disciplinary and interdisciplinary science education research","volume":"5 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching controversial socio-scientific issues in online exhibits of science museums: Covid-19 on the scene.\",\"authors\":\"Carolina Sotério,&nbsp;Adriele Ribeiro Dos Santos Lamim,&nbsp;Salete Linhares Queiroz\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43031-022-00069-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Covid-19 pandemic has sparked an unprecedented public debate over socio-scientific controversies, particularly regarding vaccination and social distancing measures. Despite the potential of such subjects for developing critical thinking and a sense of citizenship, the theme of controversies is still incipient in science museums. This documentary study investigates the way three science institutions have proposed online exhibits on Covid-19 on Google Arts & Culture platform and checks their potential for favoring teaching on controversial science topics. Google Arts & Culture platform was searched for Covid-19-related keywords and the filtering of the results was based on focus and organizing institutions. Three exhibits were detected, whose analysis was submitted to an inter-rater agreement (Cohen's kappa). The results revealed the predominance of social and economic aspects that can strongly favor more scientifically progressive views of both science literacy and a socially undistorted science. On the other hand, the superficiality of political discussions on science topics, a lack of naturalization of the controversial discussions, and an excessive use of textual content were identified, thus revealing some initiatives have not explored the interactivity, multimediality, and the way dilemmas that mark the trajectory of science museums extend to online exhibits. From this perspective, we point out paths for teaching and learning socio-scientific controversies in museums.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disciplinary and interdisciplinary science education research\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806817/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disciplinary and interdisciplinary science education research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-022-00069-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disciplinary and interdisciplinary science education research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-022-00069-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新冠肺炎大流行引发了一场前所未有的关于社会科学争议的公开辩论,尤其是关于疫苗接种和社交距离措施的争议。尽管这些主题有发展批判性思维和公民意识的潜力,但在科学博物馆中,争议的主题仍然处于萌芽阶段。这项纪录片研究调查了三家科学机构在谷歌艺术与文化平台上提议举办新冠肺炎在线展览的方式,并检查了它们支持有争议的科学主题教学的可能性。在谷歌艺术与文化平台上搜索与新冠肺炎相关的关键词,结果的过滤基于焦点和组织机构。检测到三个证物,将其分析提交给评分者之间的协议(Cohen’s kappa)。研究结果显示,社会和经济方面的优势可以强烈支持更科学进步的科学素养和社会不失真的科学观。另一方面,人们发现科学主题的政治讨论肤浅,有争议的讨论缺乏自然化,以及过度使用文本内容,从而揭示出一些举措没有探索科学博物馆发展轨迹中的互动性、多媒体性以及困境如何延伸到在线展览。从这个角度出发,我们指出了博物馆社会科学争议的教学路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teaching controversial socio-scientific issues in online exhibits of science museums: Covid-19 on the scene.

The Covid-19 pandemic has sparked an unprecedented public debate over socio-scientific controversies, particularly regarding vaccination and social distancing measures. Despite the potential of such subjects for developing critical thinking and a sense of citizenship, the theme of controversies is still incipient in science museums. This documentary study investigates the way three science institutions have proposed online exhibits on Covid-19 on Google Arts & Culture platform and checks their potential for favoring teaching on controversial science topics. Google Arts & Culture platform was searched for Covid-19-related keywords and the filtering of the results was based on focus and organizing institutions. Three exhibits were detected, whose analysis was submitted to an inter-rater agreement (Cohen's kappa). The results revealed the predominance of social and economic aspects that can strongly favor more scientifically progressive views of both science literacy and a socially undistorted science. On the other hand, the superficiality of political discussions on science topics, a lack of naturalization of the controversial discussions, and an excessive use of textual content were identified, thus revealing some initiatives have not explored the interactivity, multimediality, and the way dilemmas that mark the trajectory of science museums extend to online exhibits. From this perspective, we point out paths for teaching and learning socio-scientific controversies in museums.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Transforming standards into classrooms for knowledge-in-use: an effective and coherent project-based learning system Alternative grading practices in undergraduate STEM education: a scoping review Characterization of physics and astronomy assistant professors’ reflections on their teaching: can they promote engagement in instructional change? Correction: Moving from surviving to thriving: a taxonomy of beginning science teacher challenges Are science competitions meeting their intentions? a case study on affective and cognitive predictors of success in the Physics Olympiad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1