无静脉吻合术指尖再植的限制水平。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.04.013
Tatsuya Hara PhD , Shigeru Kurimoto PhD , Toshikazu Kurahashi PhD , Yutaro Kuwahara MD , Hiroki Takeshige MD , Shiro Urata MD
{"title":"无静脉吻合术指尖再植的限制水平。","authors":"Tatsuya Hara PhD ,&nbsp;Shigeru Kurimoto PhD ,&nbsp;Toshikazu Kurahashi PhD ,&nbsp;Yutaro Kuwahara MD ,&nbsp;Hiroki Takeshige MD ,&nbsp;Shiro Urata MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.04.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to compare the success rates of fingertip<span><span> replantation with and without </span>venous anastomosis.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>This retrospective study included 132 patients with 148 fingertip injuries who had undergone fingertip replantation (Ishikawa's classification I‒IV) between 2003 and 2020 at our hospital. Among them, 117 and 15 were men and women respectively, and their mean age was 43 years. There were 53, 44, and 51 fingertips with Ishikawa subzone II, III, and IV amputations respectively, and no cases were classified as Ishikawa subzone I. Venous anastomosis was performed on 64 fingertips (group A). This was not possible in the remaining 84 fingertips; thus, an external bleeding method was used (group B). Our external bleeding protocol consisted of 4-hourly skin pricks of the distal pulp with a 23-gauge needle for the first 5 days. The analyses included survival rates, hemoglobin levels (Hb), and </span>blood transfusions administered.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall survival rate was 90.5% (134 of 148). In group A, survival was achieved in 92.3%, 100%, and 94.3% of those with subzones II, III, and IV amputations, respectively. In group B, survival was achieved in 100%, 82.1%, and 62.5% of those with subzones II, III, and IV, respectively. Subzone IV in group B showed a significantly lower rate of replantation success. In groups A and B, the preoperative and 7-day postoperative Hb levels were 14.5 g/dL and 14.6 g/dL, and 11.3 g/dL, and 11.6 g/dL, respectively. In addition, blood transfusion was required for five patients (7.9%) in group A and six patients (7.9%) in group B. Thus, the Hb levels and blood transfusion administered were similar between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Subzone IV is an important threshold for artery-only replantation. Furthermore, our external bleeding protocol is a safe and effective method.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":"49 12","pages":"Pages 1274.e1-1274.e6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limiting Levels of Fingertip Replantation Without Venous Anastomosis\",\"authors\":\"Tatsuya Hara PhD ,&nbsp;Shigeru Kurimoto PhD ,&nbsp;Toshikazu Kurahashi PhD ,&nbsp;Yutaro Kuwahara MD ,&nbsp;Hiroki Takeshige MD ,&nbsp;Shiro Urata MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.04.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to compare the success rates of fingertip<span><span> replantation with and without </span>venous anastomosis.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>This retrospective study included 132 patients with 148 fingertip injuries who had undergone fingertip replantation (Ishikawa's classification I‒IV) between 2003 and 2020 at our hospital. Among them, 117 and 15 were men and women respectively, and their mean age was 43 years. There were 53, 44, and 51 fingertips with Ishikawa subzone II, III, and IV amputations respectively, and no cases were classified as Ishikawa subzone I. Venous anastomosis was performed on 64 fingertips (group A). This was not possible in the remaining 84 fingertips; thus, an external bleeding method was used (group B). Our external bleeding protocol consisted of 4-hourly skin pricks of the distal pulp with a 23-gauge needle for the first 5 days. The analyses included survival rates, hemoglobin levels (Hb), and </span>blood transfusions administered.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall survival rate was 90.5% (134 of 148). In group A, survival was achieved in 92.3%, 100%, and 94.3% of those with subzones II, III, and IV amputations, respectively. In group B, survival was achieved in 100%, 82.1%, and 62.5% of those with subzones II, III, and IV, respectively. Subzone IV in group B showed a significantly lower rate of replantation success. In groups A and B, the preoperative and 7-day postoperative Hb levels were 14.5 g/dL and 14.6 g/dL, and 11.3 g/dL, and 11.6 g/dL, respectively. In addition, blood transfusion was required for five patients (7.9%) in group A and six patients (7.9%) in group B. Thus, the Hb levels and blood transfusion administered were similar between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Subzone IV is an important threshold for artery-only replantation. Furthermore, our external bleeding protocol is a safe and effective method.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic IV.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"volume\":\"49 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1274.e1-1274.e6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502323001910\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502323001910","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较静脉吻合术与非静脉吻合术指尖再植的成功率。方法:回顾性分析我院2003年至2020年收治的132例148例指尖损伤患者(Ishikawa分类I-IV型)再植术。其中男性117人,女性15人,平均年龄43岁。分别有53、44、51个指尖存在Ishikawa II亚区、III亚区和IV亚区截肢,没有一例属于Ishikawa i亚区。A组64个指尖进行了静脉吻合,其余84个指尖无法进行静脉吻合;因此,采用外出血方法(B组)。我们的外出血方案包括在前5天用23号针每4小时穿刺远端牙髓。分析包括存活率、血红蛋白水平(Hb)和输血量。结果:总生存率为90.5%(134 / 148)。A组II区、III区和IV区截肢患者的生存率分别为92.3%、100%和94.3%。B组II、III和IV亚区患者的生存率分别为100%、82.1%和62.5%。B组IV区再植成功率明显降低。A组和B组术前和术后7天Hb水平分别为14.5 g/dL和14.6 g/dL, 11.3 g/dL和11.6 g/dL。此外,A组有5例(7.9%)患者需要输血,b组有6例(7.9%)患者需要输血。因此,两组之间的Hb水平和输血量相似。结论:IV区是单纯动脉再植的重要阈值。此外,我们的体外出血方案是一种安全有效的方法。研究类型/证据水平:治疗性IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Limiting Levels of Fingertip Replantation Without Venous Anastomosis

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the success rates of fingertip replantation with and without venous anastomosis.

Methods

This retrospective study included 132 patients with 148 fingertip injuries who had undergone fingertip replantation (Ishikawa's classification I‒IV) between 2003 and 2020 at our hospital. Among them, 117 and 15 were men and women respectively, and their mean age was 43 years. There were 53, 44, and 51 fingertips with Ishikawa subzone II, III, and IV amputations respectively, and no cases were classified as Ishikawa subzone I. Venous anastomosis was performed on 64 fingertips (group A). This was not possible in the remaining 84 fingertips; thus, an external bleeding method was used (group B). Our external bleeding protocol consisted of 4-hourly skin pricks of the distal pulp with a 23-gauge needle for the first 5 days. The analyses included survival rates, hemoglobin levels (Hb), and blood transfusions administered.

Results

The overall survival rate was 90.5% (134 of 148). In group A, survival was achieved in 92.3%, 100%, and 94.3% of those with subzones II, III, and IV amputations, respectively. In group B, survival was achieved in 100%, 82.1%, and 62.5% of those with subzones II, III, and IV, respectively. Subzone IV in group B showed a significantly lower rate of replantation success. In groups A and B, the preoperative and 7-day postoperative Hb levels were 14.5 g/dL and 14.6 g/dL, and 11.3 g/dL, and 11.6 g/dL, respectively. In addition, blood transfusion was required for five patients (7.9%) in group A and six patients (7.9%) in group B. Thus, the Hb levels and blood transfusion administered were similar between the two groups.

Conclusions

Subzone IV is an important threshold for artery-only replantation. Furthermore, our external bleeding protocol is a safe and effective method.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Development of International Quality Measures Targeting Low-Value Care in Hand Surgery. Replication of Coupled Movements of the Wrist: A Cadaveric Study of Total Wrist Arthroplasty. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Distal Radius Fractures Following Dorsal Bridge Fixation to the Second Versus Third Metacarpal. SARM1 Inhibition Maintains Axonal Integrity After Rat Sciatic Nerve Transection and Repair. Distal Radius Fracture in the Setting of Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Management and Adverse Events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1