Daniel Molano-Franco, Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez, Alfonso Muriel, Laura Del Campo-Albendea, Silvia Fernández-García, Ana Alvarez-Méndez, Daniel Simancas-Racines, Andres Viteri, Guillermo Sanchez, Borja Fernandez-Felix, Jesus Lopez-Alcalde, Ivan Solà, Dimelza Osorio, Khalid Saeed Khan, Xavier Nuvials, Ricard Ferrer, Javier Zamora
{"title":"基础降钙素原、c -反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6和前列尿素预测危重症脓毒症患者死亡率:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Daniel Molano-Franco, Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez, Alfonso Muriel, Laura Del Campo-Albendea, Silvia Fernández-García, Ana Alvarez-Méndez, Daniel Simancas-Racines, Andres Viteri, Guillermo Sanchez, Borja Fernandez-Felix, Jesus Lopez-Alcalde, Ivan Solà, Dimelza Osorio, Khalid Saeed Khan, Xavier Nuvials, Ricard Ferrer, Javier Zamora","doi":"10.1186/s41512-023-00152-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous biomarkers have been proposed for diagnosis, therapeutic, and prognosis in sepsis. Previous evaluations of the value of biomarkers for predicting mortality due to this life-threatening condition fail to address the complexity of this condition and the risk of bias associated with prognostic studies. We evaluate the predictive performance of four of these biomarkers in the prognosis of mortality through a methodologically sound evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine, in critically ill adults with sepsis, whether procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and presepsin (sCD14) are independent prognostic factors for mortality. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to March 2023. Only Phase-2 confirmatory prognostic factor studies among critically ill septic adults were included. Random effects meta-analyses pooled the prognostic association estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 60 studies (15,681 patients) with 99 biomarker assessments. Quality of the statistical analysis and reporting domains using the QUIPS tool showed high risk of bias in > 60% assessments. The biomarker measurement as a continuous variable in models adjusted by key covariates (age and severity score) for predicting mortality at 28-30 days showed a null or near to null association for basal PCT (pooled OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.99-1.003), CRP (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.17), and IL-6 (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01-1.03) and sCD14 (pooled HR = 1.003, 95% CI = 1.000 to 1.006). Additional meta-analyses accounting for other prognostic covariates had similarly null findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baseline, isolated measurement of PCT, CRP, IL-6, and sCD14 has not been shown to help predict mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis. The role of these biomarkers should be evaluated in new studies where the patient selection would be standardized and the measurement of biomarker results.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD42019128790).</p>","PeriodicalId":72800,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","volume":"7 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basal procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and presepsin for prediction of mortality in critically ill septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Molano-Franco, Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez, Alfonso Muriel, Laura Del Campo-Albendea, Silvia Fernández-García, Ana Alvarez-Méndez, Daniel Simancas-Racines, Andres Viteri, Guillermo Sanchez, Borja Fernandez-Felix, Jesus Lopez-Alcalde, Ivan Solà, Dimelza Osorio, Khalid Saeed Khan, Xavier Nuvials, Ricard Ferrer, Javier Zamora\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41512-023-00152-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous biomarkers have been proposed for diagnosis, therapeutic, and prognosis in sepsis. Previous evaluations of the value of biomarkers for predicting mortality due to this life-threatening condition fail to address the complexity of this condition and the risk of bias associated with prognostic studies. We evaluate the predictive performance of four of these biomarkers in the prognosis of mortality through a methodologically sound evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine, in critically ill adults with sepsis, whether procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and presepsin (sCD14) are independent prognostic factors for mortality. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to March 2023. Only Phase-2 confirmatory prognostic factor studies among critically ill septic adults were included. Random effects meta-analyses pooled the prognostic association estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 60 studies (15,681 patients) with 99 biomarker assessments. Quality of the statistical analysis and reporting domains using the QUIPS tool showed high risk of bias in > 60% assessments. The biomarker measurement as a continuous variable in models adjusted by key covariates (age and severity score) for predicting mortality at 28-30 days showed a null or near to null association for basal PCT (pooled OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.99-1.003), CRP (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.17), and IL-6 (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01-1.03) and sCD14 (pooled HR = 1.003, 95% CI = 1.000 to 1.006). Additional meta-analyses accounting for other prognostic covariates had similarly null findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baseline, isolated measurement of PCT, CRP, IL-6, and sCD14 has not been shown to help predict mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis. The role of these biomarkers should be evaluated in new studies where the patient selection would be standardized and the measurement of biomarker results.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD42019128790).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and prognostic research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399020/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and prognostic research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-023-00152-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-023-00152-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:许多生物标志物已被提出用于败血症的诊断、治疗和预后。先前对生物标志物在预测这种危及生命的疾病的死亡率方面的价值的评估未能解决这种疾病的复杂性和与预后研究相关的偏倚风险。我们通过方法学上合理的评估来评估四种生物标志物在死亡率预后中的预测性能。方法:我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以确定危重症脓毒症成人患者降钙素原(PCT)、c反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)和尿蛋白酶素(sCD14)是否是死亡率的独立预后因素。我们检索了截至2023年3月的MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials。仅纳入了危重脓毒症成人的2期确诊预后因素研究。随机效应荟萃分析汇总了预后关联估计。结果:我们纳入了60项研究(15681例患者),99项生物标志物评估。使用QUIPS工具的统计分析和报告领域的质量在评估中显示出高达60%的高偏倚风险。在由关键协变量(年龄和严重程度评分)调整的模型中,作为预测28-30天死亡率的连续变量的生物标志物测量显示,基础PCT(合并or = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.99-1.003)、CRP (or = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.87 - 1.17)、IL-6 (or = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01-1.03)和sCD14(合并HR = 1.003, 95% CI = 1.000 - 1.006)的相关性为零或接近零。考虑其他预后协变量的其他荟萃分析也有类似的无效结果。结论:基线、单独测量PCT、CRP、IL-6和sCD14并不能帮助预测危重症脓毒症患者的死亡率。这些生物标志物的作用应该在新的研究中进行评估,在这些研究中,患者的选择和生物标志物结果的测量将是标准化的。试验注册:PROSPERO (CRD42019128790)。
Basal procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and presepsin for prediction of mortality in critically ill septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Numerous biomarkers have been proposed for diagnosis, therapeutic, and prognosis in sepsis. Previous evaluations of the value of biomarkers for predicting mortality due to this life-threatening condition fail to address the complexity of this condition and the risk of bias associated with prognostic studies. We evaluate the predictive performance of four of these biomarkers in the prognosis of mortality through a methodologically sound evaluation.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine, in critically ill adults with sepsis, whether procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and presepsin (sCD14) are independent prognostic factors for mortality. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to March 2023. Only Phase-2 confirmatory prognostic factor studies among critically ill septic adults were included. Random effects meta-analyses pooled the prognostic association estimates.
Results: We included 60 studies (15,681 patients) with 99 biomarker assessments. Quality of the statistical analysis and reporting domains using the QUIPS tool showed high risk of bias in > 60% assessments. The biomarker measurement as a continuous variable in models adjusted by key covariates (age and severity score) for predicting mortality at 28-30 days showed a null or near to null association for basal PCT (pooled OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.99-1.003), CRP (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.17), and IL-6 (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01-1.03) and sCD14 (pooled HR = 1.003, 95% CI = 1.000 to 1.006). Additional meta-analyses accounting for other prognostic covariates had similarly null findings.
Conclusion: Baseline, isolated measurement of PCT, CRP, IL-6, and sCD14 has not been shown to help predict mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis. The role of these biomarkers should be evaluated in new studies where the patient selection would be standardized and the measurement of biomarker results.