单层颈椎前路融合术中 PEEK 固定架与钛涂层 PEEK 固定架的比较:随机对照研究

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-28 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1770694
Johannes Schröder, Thomas Kampulz, Sonunandita K Bajaj, Arnd Georg Hellwig, Michael Winking
{"title":"单层颈椎前路融合术中 PEEK 固定架与钛涂层 PEEK 固定架的比较:随机对照研究","authors":"Johannes Schröder, Thomas Kampulz, Sonunandita K Bajaj, Arnd Georg Hellwig, Michael Winking","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1770694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The implantation of a spacer is a common practice after anterior diskectomy in cervical spine. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cages have replaced titanium implants due to their better radiologic visibility and appearance in postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. However, PEEK showed apparently higher nonunion rates than titanium cages. The aim of the study was to evaluate the fusion behavior of plain PEEK cages in comparison to titanium-coated PEEK (TiPEEK) cages.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> We randomized 104 patients with single-level cervical radiculopathy or mild myelopathy. They were divided into two groups of 52 patients each, receiving either a PEEK cage or the titanium-coated variant of the same cage type. The 1- and 2-year follow-ups were completed by 43 patients in the PEEK group and by 50 patients in the TiPEEK group. Fusion was determined by plain X-ray and lateral functional X-ray.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Two years after surgery, a complete fusion was observed in 37 patients of the PEEK group (86%). Six cases were considered as nonunions. In the TiPEEK group, we found 41 fusions (82%) and 9 nonunions at this time. The difference was not considered significant (<i>p</i> = 0.59). The clinical evaluation of the two groups showed no difference in the neurologic examination as well in the pain scores over the time period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> Despite some assumptions about an advantage of TiPEEK over PEEK cages for fusion in cervical spine surgery, this prospective randomized controlled study did not find an accelerated or improved fusion using TiPEEK for anterior cervical diskectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"262-268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PEEK Cages versus Titanium-Coated PEEK Cages in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Study.\",\"authors\":\"Johannes Schröder, Thomas Kampulz, Sonunandita K Bajaj, Arnd Georg Hellwig, Michael Winking\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1770694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The implantation of a spacer is a common practice after anterior diskectomy in cervical spine. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cages have replaced titanium implants due to their better radiologic visibility and appearance in postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. However, PEEK showed apparently higher nonunion rates than titanium cages. The aim of the study was to evaluate the fusion behavior of plain PEEK cages in comparison to titanium-coated PEEK (TiPEEK) cages.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> We randomized 104 patients with single-level cervical radiculopathy or mild myelopathy. They were divided into two groups of 52 patients each, receiving either a PEEK cage or the titanium-coated variant of the same cage type. The 1- and 2-year follow-ups were completed by 43 patients in the PEEK group and by 50 patients in the TiPEEK group. Fusion was determined by plain X-ray and lateral functional X-ray.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Two years after surgery, a complete fusion was observed in 37 patients of the PEEK group (86%). Six cases were considered as nonunions. In the TiPEEK group, we found 41 fusions (82%) and 9 nonunions at this time. The difference was not considered significant (<i>p</i> = 0.59). The clinical evaluation of the two groups showed no difference in the neurologic examination as well in the pain scores over the time period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> Despite some assumptions about an advantage of TiPEEK over PEEK cages for fusion in cervical spine surgery, this prospective randomized controlled study did not find an accelerated or improved fusion using TiPEEK for anterior cervical diskectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"262-268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1770694\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1770694","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在颈椎前路椎间盘切除术后植入垫片是一种常见的做法。聚醚醚酮(PEEK)保持架由于在术后磁共振成像(MRI)扫描中具有更好的放射学可见度和外观而取代了钛植入物。然而,PEEK 骨架的不愈合率明显高于钛骨架。本研究旨在评估普通 PEEK 骨架与钛涂层 PEEK(TiPEEK)骨架的融合情况:方法:我们随机抽取了 104 名单级颈椎根性病变或轻度脊髓病变患者。他们被分为两组,每组 52 人,分别接受 PEEK 骨架或同一类型的钛涂层变体骨架。PEEK 组的 43 名患者和 TiPEEK 组的 50 名患者完成了为期 1 年和 2 年的随访。融合情况由普通 X 光片和侧位功能 X 光片确定:结果:术后两年,PEEK组的37名患者(86%)实现了完全融合。有 6 例被视为非融合。在 TiPEEK 组中,我们发现此时有 41 例融合(82%)和 9 例未融合。差异不明显(P = 0.59)。对两组患者的临床评估显示,神经系统检查和疼痛评分在一段时间内没有差异:尽管有人认为在颈椎手术中使用TiPEEK与PEEK保持架进行融合具有优势,但这项前瞻性随机对照研究并未发现在颈椎前路椎间盘切除术中使用TiPEEK能加速或改善融合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PEEK Cages versus Titanium-Coated PEEK Cages in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Background:  The implantation of a spacer is a common practice after anterior diskectomy in cervical spine. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cages have replaced titanium implants due to their better radiologic visibility and appearance in postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. However, PEEK showed apparently higher nonunion rates than titanium cages. The aim of the study was to evaluate the fusion behavior of plain PEEK cages in comparison to titanium-coated PEEK (TiPEEK) cages.

Method:  We randomized 104 patients with single-level cervical radiculopathy or mild myelopathy. They were divided into two groups of 52 patients each, receiving either a PEEK cage or the titanium-coated variant of the same cage type. The 1- and 2-year follow-ups were completed by 43 patients in the PEEK group and by 50 patients in the TiPEEK group. Fusion was determined by plain X-ray and lateral functional X-ray.

Results:  Two years after surgery, a complete fusion was observed in 37 patients of the PEEK group (86%). Six cases were considered as nonunions. In the TiPEEK group, we found 41 fusions (82%) and 9 nonunions at this time. The difference was not considered significant (p = 0.59). The clinical evaluation of the two groups showed no difference in the neurologic examination as well in the pain scores over the time period.

Conclusions:  Despite some assumptions about an advantage of TiPEEK over PEEK cages for fusion in cervical spine surgery, this prospective randomized controlled study did not find an accelerated or improved fusion using TiPEEK for anterior cervical diskectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery (JNLS A) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS A currently serves as the official organ of several national neurosurgery societies. JNLS A is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS A includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS A covers purely neurosurgical topics.
期刊最新文献
Vagal Nerve Stimulation in the Pediatric Population and Correlation between Family and Treatment Team Perspectives: Single-Center Experience. Combined one-step hybrid treatment for a paediatric giant internal carotid artery aneurysm: a case report. A New Concept for Cervical Expansion Screws Using Shape Memory Alloy: A Feasibility Study. Artificial Intelligence Prediction Model of Occurrence of Cerebral Vasospasms Based on Machine Learning. Paresis of the Oculomotor Nerve due to Neurovascular Conflict with Superior Cerebellar Artery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1