心力衰竭患者的知识缺陷:诊断准确性和病因关系研究

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Knowledge Pub Date : 2023-06-10 DOI:10.1111/2047-3095.12434
Suelayne Santana de Araújo RN, MSc, Cláudia Gabrielle da Silva RN, MSc, Suzana de Oliveira Mangueira RN, MSc, PhD, Ana Luísa Brandão de Carvalho Lira RN, MSc, PhD, Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes RN, MSc, PhD, Camila Takáo Lopes RN, MSc, PhD, Cecília Maria Farias de Queiroz Frazão RN, MSc, PhD
{"title":"心力衰竭患者的知识缺陷:诊断准确性和病因关系研究","authors":"Suelayne Santana de Araújo RN, MSc,&nbsp;Cláudia Gabrielle da Silva RN, MSc,&nbsp;Suzana de Oliveira Mangueira RN, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Ana Luísa Brandão de Carvalho Lira RN, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes RN, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Camila Takáo Lopes RN, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Cecília Maria Farias de Queiroz Frazão RN, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.12434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the accuracy of defining characteristics and causal relationships of the etiological factors of the nursing diagnosis deficient knowledge in individuals with heart failure .</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data sources</h3>\n \n <p>An analytical, cross-sectional study on the diagnostic accuracy of the defining characteristics and causal relationships of the etiological factors of the nursing diagnosis. The sample consisted of 140 patients with chronic HF and in outpatient follow-up. The latent class analysis method was used to test the accuracy of measurements and estimate the prevalence of the diagnosis. The calculation of subsequent probabilities and the odds ratio ( were also parameters employed. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Pernambuco.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data synthesis</h3>\n \n <p>The diagnosis had an estimated prevalence of 38.57% in the sample. The inaccurate statements about the disease and/or therapy, self-care deficient performance, and inadequate behavior were the clinical indicators that best predicted the presence of the diagnosis and demonstrated the same sensitivity value (1.0000), specificity (1.0000), and 95% confidence interval (0.9999–1.0000) for all. The populations at risk was elderly (OR = 2.12, confidence interval 95% = 1.05–4.27), and illiterate individuals (OR = 2.07, confidence interval 95% = 1.03–4.16) had an approximately twofold great chance of developing havening deficient knowledge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The evaluation of the accuracy of clinical indicators, corresponding to the defining characteristics in the study, contributed to screening and diagnostic establishment capacity in clinical practice, and to the translation of theoretical and practical knowledge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for nursing practice</h3>\n \n <p>Accurate clinical indicators of the nursing diagnosis deficient knowledge facilitate the clinical reasoning of nurses and favor the professional's role in the development of health education strategies focused on the acquisition of knowledge about the disease by patients, family members, and caregivers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":"35 2","pages":"186-194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deficient knowledge in patients with heart failure: A study of diagnostic accuracy and etiological relationships\",\"authors\":\"Suelayne Santana de Araújo RN, MSc,&nbsp;Cláudia Gabrielle da Silva RN, MSc,&nbsp;Suzana de Oliveira Mangueira RN, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Ana Luísa Brandão de Carvalho Lira RN, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes RN, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Camila Takáo Lopes RN, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Cecília Maria Farias de Queiroz Frazão RN, MSc, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/2047-3095.12434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the accuracy of defining characteristics and causal relationships of the etiological factors of the nursing diagnosis deficient knowledge in individuals with heart failure .</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data sources</h3>\\n \\n <p>An analytical, cross-sectional study on the diagnostic accuracy of the defining characteristics and causal relationships of the etiological factors of the nursing diagnosis. The sample consisted of 140 patients with chronic HF and in outpatient follow-up. The latent class analysis method was used to test the accuracy of measurements and estimate the prevalence of the diagnosis. The calculation of subsequent probabilities and the odds ratio ( were also parameters employed. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Pernambuco.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data synthesis</h3>\\n \\n <p>The diagnosis had an estimated prevalence of 38.57% in the sample. The inaccurate statements about the disease and/or therapy, self-care deficient performance, and inadequate behavior were the clinical indicators that best predicted the presence of the diagnosis and demonstrated the same sensitivity value (1.0000), specificity (1.0000), and 95% confidence interval (0.9999–1.0000) for all. The populations at risk was elderly (OR = 2.12, confidence interval 95% = 1.05–4.27), and illiterate individuals (OR = 2.07, confidence interval 95% = 1.03–4.16) had an approximately twofold great chance of developing havening deficient knowledge.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The evaluation of the accuracy of clinical indicators, corresponding to the defining characteristics in the study, contributed to screening and diagnostic establishment capacity in clinical practice, and to the translation of theoretical and practical knowledge.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications for nursing practice</h3>\\n \\n <p>Accurate clinical indicators of the nursing diagnosis deficient knowledge facilitate the clinical reasoning of nurses and favor the professional's role in the development of health education strategies focused on the acquisition of knowledge about the disease by patients, family members, and caregivers.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"186-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2047-3095.12434\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2047-3095.12434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 评价心力衰竭患者护理诊断病因学知识缺乏的定义特征和因果关系的准确性。 数据来源 一项关于护理诊断病因的定义特征和因果关系诊断准确性的横断面分析研究。样本包括 140 名慢性心力衰竭门诊随访患者。采用潜类分析法检验测量的准确性,并估算诊断的流行率。随后的概率计算和几率比()也是采用的参数。这项研究获得了伯南布哥联邦大学研究伦理委员会的批准。 数据综述 据估计,该诊断在样本中的流行率为 38.57%。对疾病和/或治疗的不准确陈述、自我护理不足和行为不当是最能预测诊断结果的临床指标,并显示出相同的灵敏度(1.0000)、特异性(1.0000)和 95% 置信区间(0.9999-1.0000)。高危人群中,老年人(OR = 2.12,置信区间 95% = 1.05-4.27)和文盲(OR = 2.07,置信区间 95% = 1.03-4.16)出现哈宁知识不足的几率大约是其他人的两倍。 结论 根据研究中的定义特征对临床指标的准确性进行评估,有助于在临床实践中建立筛查和诊断能力,并促进理论和实践知识的转化。 对护理实践的启示 护理诊断缺陷知识的准确临床指标有助于护士的临床推理,有利于专业人员在制定健康教育策略中发挥作用,重点关注患者、家庭成员和护理人员对疾病知识的掌握。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deficient knowledge in patients with heart failure: A study of diagnostic accuracy and etiological relationships

Purpose

To evaluate the accuracy of defining characteristics and causal relationships of the etiological factors of the nursing diagnosis deficient knowledge in individuals with heart failure .

Data sources

An analytical, cross-sectional study on the diagnostic accuracy of the defining characteristics and causal relationships of the etiological factors of the nursing diagnosis. The sample consisted of 140 patients with chronic HF and in outpatient follow-up. The latent class analysis method was used to test the accuracy of measurements and estimate the prevalence of the diagnosis. The calculation of subsequent probabilities and the odds ratio ( were also parameters employed. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Pernambuco.

Data synthesis

The diagnosis had an estimated prevalence of 38.57% in the sample. The inaccurate statements about the disease and/or therapy, self-care deficient performance, and inadequate behavior were the clinical indicators that best predicted the presence of the diagnosis and demonstrated the same sensitivity value (1.0000), specificity (1.0000), and 95% confidence interval (0.9999–1.0000) for all. The populations at risk was elderly (OR = 2.12, confidence interval 95% = 1.05–4.27), and illiterate individuals (OR = 2.07, confidence interval 95% = 1.03–4.16) had an approximately twofold great chance of developing havening deficient knowledge.

Conclusion

The evaluation of the accuracy of clinical indicators, corresponding to the defining characteristics in the study, contributed to screening and diagnostic establishment capacity in clinical practice, and to the translation of theoretical and practical knowledge.

Implications for nursing practice

Accurate clinical indicators of the nursing diagnosis deficient knowledge facilitate the clinical reasoning of nurses and favor the professional's role in the development of health education strategies focused on the acquisition of knowledge about the disease by patients, family members, and caregivers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge. The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages. The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy. The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of nursing diagnoses identified at admission and discharge of patients with decompensated heart failure. Evidence of content validity of the "Blood Transfusion Reaction" (code 0700) nursing outcome from the nursing outcomes classification. Evaluating the accuracy of impaired skin integrity in critically ill patients: Key characteristics and clinical implications. Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis inadequate social support network in breastfeeding mothers: A cross-sectional study. The prevalence of self-neglect among older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1