哦,是的,这也是反思"--运用辨证心理学描述全科医生注册人员如何构建反思。

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Education Pub Date : 2023-08-09 DOI:10.1111/medu.15183
Sven P. C. Schaepkens, Anne de la Croix, Mario Veen
{"title":"哦,是的,这也是反思\"--运用辨证心理学描述全科医生注册人员如何构建反思。","authors":"Sven P. C. Schaepkens,&nbsp;Anne de la Croix,&nbsp;Mario Veen","doi":"10.1111/medu.15183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Learners in medical education generally perceive that reflection is important, but they also find that reflection is not always valuable or practically applicable. We address the gap between the potential benefits of reflection and its practical implementation in medical education. We examined the perspective of Dutch GP registrars who (must) reflect for their GP specialty training to understand their participant perspective on reflection. Our aim is stimulating alignment between reflective activities that occur in a medical curriculum and the ideals of reflection as a valuable educational activity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted, video-recorded and transcribed seven focus group sessions with GP registrars in 2021 across two Dutch GP educational programmes. We used discursive psychology to analyse the focus group data by focusing on ‘assessments of reflection’. We analysed their discursive features (<i>how</i> something was said) and content features (<i>what</i> was said) and related these to each other to understand how GP registrars construct reflection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants constructed reflection with nuance; they combined negative and positive assessments that displayed varied orientations to reflection. First, their combined assessments showed complex orientations to norms and experiences with reflecting in practice and that these are not simply negative or positive. Second, GP registrars constructed reflection as a negotiable topic and showed how reflection and its value can be variably understood. Third, through combined assessments, they displayed an orientation to the integration of reflection with other educational tasks, which impacts its value.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Generally, GP registrars speak positively about reflection, but the value of reflection partly depends on its proper integration with other educational tasks. When meaningful integration fails, activities to stimulate reflection can overshoot their own goal and hamper learner motivation to reflect. Developing a healthy ‘reflection culture’ could mitigate some challenges. Therein, reflection is treated as important while learners also have adequate autonomy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"58 3","pages":"318-326"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15183","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Oh yes, that is also reflection’—Using discursive psychology to describe how GP registrars construct reflection\",\"authors\":\"Sven P. C. Schaepkens,&nbsp;Anne de la Croix,&nbsp;Mario Veen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/medu.15183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Learners in medical education generally perceive that reflection is important, but they also find that reflection is not always valuable or practically applicable. We address the gap between the potential benefits of reflection and its practical implementation in medical education. We examined the perspective of Dutch GP registrars who (must) reflect for their GP specialty training to understand their participant perspective on reflection. Our aim is stimulating alignment between reflective activities that occur in a medical curriculum and the ideals of reflection as a valuable educational activity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted, video-recorded and transcribed seven focus group sessions with GP registrars in 2021 across two Dutch GP educational programmes. We used discursive psychology to analyse the focus group data by focusing on ‘assessments of reflection’. We analysed their discursive features (<i>how</i> something was said) and content features (<i>what</i> was said) and related these to each other to understand how GP registrars construct reflection.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants constructed reflection with nuance; they combined negative and positive assessments that displayed varied orientations to reflection. First, their combined assessments showed complex orientations to norms and experiences with reflecting in practice and that these are not simply negative or positive. Second, GP registrars constructed reflection as a negotiable topic and showed how reflection and its value can be variably understood. Third, through combined assessments, they displayed an orientation to the integration of reflection with other educational tasks, which impacts its value.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Generally, GP registrars speak positively about reflection, but the value of reflection partly depends on its proper integration with other educational tasks. When meaningful integration fails, activities to stimulate reflection can overshoot their own goal and hamper learner motivation to reflect. Developing a healthy ‘reflection culture’ could mitigate some challenges. Therein, reflection is treated as important while learners also have adequate autonomy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"58 3\",\"pages\":\"318-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15183\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.15183\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.15183","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:医学教育中的学习者普遍认为反思很重要,但他们也发现反思并不总是有价值或切实可行。我们探讨了反思的潜在益处与其在医学教育中的实际应用之间的差距。我们研究了荷兰全科医生注册人员的观点,他们(必须)在全科医生专业培训中进行反思,以了解参与者对反思的看法。我们的目的是促进医学课程中的反思活动与反思作为一种有价值的教育活动的理想之间的一致性:我们与 2021 年在荷兰两个全科医生教育项目中注册的全科医生进行了七次焦点小组讨论,并进行了视频录像和转录。我们运用话语心理学分析了焦点小组的数据,重点关注 "反思评估"。我们分析了他们的话语特征(如何说某事)和内容特征(说了什么),并将这些特征相互联系起来,以了解全科医生注册人员如何构建反思:结果:参与者构建的反思具有细微差别;他们结合了消极和积极的评估,显示出不同的反思取向。首先,他们的综合评估显示了在实践中进行反思的规范和经验的复杂取向,而且这些取向并非简单的消极或积极。其次,全科医生注册人员将反思构建为一个可协商的话题,并展示了如何以不同的方式理解反思及其价值。第三,通过综合评估,他们表现出将反思与其他教育任务相结合的取向,这影响了反思的价值:一般来说,全科医生注册人员对反思的评价是积极的,但反思的价值部分取决于其与其他教育任务的适当整合。如果不能进行有意义的整合,激励反思的活动就会超出其本身的目标,阻碍学习者反思的积极性。发展健康的 "反思文化 "可以缓解一些挑战。在这种文化中,反思是重要的,同时学习者也有充分的自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Oh yes, that is also reflection’—Using discursive psychology to describe how GP registrars construct reflection

Introduction

Learners in medical education generally perceive that reflection is important, but they also find that reflection is not always valuable or practically applicable. We address the gap between the potential benefits of reflection and its practical implementation in medical education. We examined the perspective of Dutch GP registrars who (must) reflect for their GP specialty training to understand their participant perspective on reflection. Our aim is stimulating alignment between reflective activities that occur in a medical curriculum and the ideals of reflection as a valuable educational activity.

Methods

We conducted, video-recorded and transcribed seven focus group sessions with GP registrars in 2021 across two Dutch GP educational programmes. We used discursive psychology to analyse the focus group data by focusing on ‘assessments of reflection’. We analysed their discursive features (how something was said) and content features (what was said) and related these to each other to understand how GP registrars construct reflection.

Results

Participants constructed reflection with nuance; they combined negative and positive assessments that displayed varied orientations to reflection. First, their combined assessments showed complex orientations to norms and experiences with reflecting in practice and that these are not simply negative or positive. Second, GP registrars constructed reflection as a negotiable topic and showed how reflection and its value can be variably understood. Third, through combined assessments, they displayed an orientation to the integration of reflection with other educational tasks, which impacts its value.

Conclusions

Generally, GP registrars speak positively about reflection, but the value of reflection partly depends on its proper integration with other educational tasks. When meaningful integration fails, activities to stimulate reflection can overshoot their own goal and hamper learner motivation to reflect. Developing a healthy ‘reflection culture’ could mitigate some challenges. Therein, reflection is treated as important while learners also have adequate autonomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
期刊最新文献
The need for critical and intersectional approaches to equity efforts in postgraduate medical education: A critical narrative review. When I say … neurodiversity paradigm. The transition to clerkshIps bootcamp: Innovative and flexible curriculum strategies post COVID-19 adaptation. Issue Information Empowering dental students' collaborative learning using peer assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1