缺乏维生素K或拮抗剂ii诱导的蛋白与甲胎蛋白在肝细胞癌诊断中的作用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

Abdallah Kobeissy, Nooraldin Merza, Alsadiq Al-Hillan, Safa Boujemaa, Zohaib Ahmed, Mohamad Nawras, Mohammed Albaaj, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Yaseen Alastal, Mona Hassan
{"title":"缺乏维生素K或拮抗剂ii诱导的蛋白与甲胎蛋白在肝细胞癌诊断中的作用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Abdallah Kobeissy,&nbsp;Nooraldin Merza,&nbsp;Alsadiq Al-Hillan,&nbsp;Safa Boujemaa,&nbsp;Zohaib Ahmed,&nbsp;Mohamad Nawras,&nbsp;Mohammed Albaaj,&nbsp;Dushyant Singh Dahiya,&nbsp;Yaseen Alastal,&nbsp;Mona Hassan","doi":"10.14740/jocmr4951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) and α-fetoprotein (AFP) are promising tumor markers for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Yet, their diagnostic performance differs throughout HCC investigations. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of PIVKA-II and AFP in the diagnosis of HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant studies from eight databases, which were published up to February 2023, in order to compare the diagnostic performance of PIVKA-II and AFP for HCC. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of each biomarker.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three studies were identified. The pooled sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI)) of PIVKA-II and AFP was 0.71 (0.70 - 0.72) and 0.64 (0.63 - 0.65), respectively in diagnosis of HCC, and the corresponding pooled specificity (95% CI) was 0.90 (0.89 - 0.90) and 0.87 (0.87 - 0.88), respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of PIVKA-II and AFP was 0.89 (0.88 - 0.90) and 0.78 (0.77 - 0.79), respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that PIVKA-II presented higher AUC values compared to AFP in terms of ethnic group (African, European, Asian, and American patients), etiology (mixed-type HCC, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related, and hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related) and sample size of cases (≤ 100 and > 100).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reveals that PIVKA-II is a promising biomarker for identifying and tracking HCC, exhibiting greater accuracy than AFP. Our findings indicate that PIVKA-II outperforms AFP in detecting HCC across diverse racial groups and sample sizes, as well as in cases of HBV-related, HCV-related, or mixed-etiology HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research","volume":"15 7","pages":"343-359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ef/18/jocmr-15-343.PMC10416192.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protein Induced by Vitamin K Absence or Antagonist-II Versus Alpha-Fetoprotein in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Abdallah Kobeissy,&nbsp;Nooraldin Merza,&nbsp;Alsadiq Al-Hillan,&nbsp;Safa Boujemaa,&nbsp;Zohaib Ahmed,&nbsp;Mohamad Nawras,&nbsp;Mohammed Albaaj,&nbsp;Dushyant Singh Dahiya,&nbsp;Yaseen Alastal,&nbsp;Mona Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.14740/jocmr4951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) and α-fetoprotein (AFP) are promising tumor markers for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Yet, their diagnostic performance differs throughout HCC investigations. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of PIVKA-II and AFP in the diagnosis of HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant studies from eight databases, which were published up to February 2023, in order to compare the diagnostic performance of PIVKA-II and AFP for HCC. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of each biomarker.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three studies were identified. The pooled sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI)) of PIVKA-II and AFP was 0.71 (0.70 - 0.72) and 0.64 (0.63 - 0.65), respectively in diagnosis of HCC, and the corresponding pooled specificity (95% CI) was 0.90 (0.89 - 0.90) and 0.87 (0.87 - 0.88), respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of PIVKA-II and AFP was 0.89 (0.88 - 0.90) and 0.78 (0.77 - 0.79), respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that PIVKA-II presented higher AUC values compared to AFP in terms of ethnic group (African, European, Asian, and American patients), etiology (mixed-type HCC, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related, and hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related) and sample size of cases (≤ 100 and > 100).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reveals that PIVKA-II is a promising biomarker for identifying and tracking HCC, exhibiting greater accuracy than AFP. Our findings indicate that PIVKA-II outperforms AFP in detecting HCC across diverse racial groups and sample sizes, as well as in cases of HBV-related, HCV-related, or mixed-etiology HCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research\",\"volume\":\"15 7\",\"pages\":\"343-359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ef/18/jocmr-15-343.PMC10416192.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4951\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:缺乏维生素K或拮抗剂ii (PIVKA-II)和α-胎蛋白(AFP)诱导的蛋白是诊断肝细胞癌(HCC)的有希望的肿瘤标志物。然而,在不同的HCC调查中,它们的诊断表现不同。本荟萃分析的目的是评估PIVKA-II和AFP在HCC诊断中的有效性。方法:系统检索截至2023年2月发表的8个数据库的相关研究,比较PIVKA-II和AFP对HCC的诊断效果。计算合并敏感性和特异性。采用总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线评估各生物标志物的诊断准确性。结果:确认了53项研究。PIVKA-II和AFP诊断HCC的综合敏感性(95%可信区间(CI))分别为0.71(0.70 ~ 0.72)和0.64(0.63 ~ 0.65),相应的综合特异性(95% CI)分别为0.90(0.89 ~ 0.90)和0.87(0.87 ~ 0.88)。PIVKA-II和AFP的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.89(0.88 ~ 0.90)和0.78(0.77 ~ 0.79)。亚组分析显示,PIVKA-II在族群(非洲、欧洲、亚洲和美洲患者)、病因(混合型HCC、丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)相关和乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)相关)和病例样本量(≤100和> 100)方面的AUC值高于AFP。结论:本研究表明PIVKA-II是一种有前景的识别和跟踪HCC的生物标志物,具有比AFP更高的准确性。我们的研究结果表明,PIVKA-II在检测不同种族群体和样本量的HCC以及hbv相关,hcv相关或混合病因的HCC方面优于AFP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Protein Induced by Vitamin K Absence or Antagonist-II Versus Alpha-Fetoprotein in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Background: Protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) and α-fetoprotein (AFP) are promising tumor markers for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Yet, their diagnostic performance differs throughout HCC investigations. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of PIVKA-II and AFP in the diagnosis of HCC.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant studies from eight databases, which were published up to February 2023, in order to compare the diagnostic performance of PIVKA-II and AFP for HCC. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of each biomarker.

Results: Fifty-three studies were identified. The pooled sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI)) of PIVKA-II and AFP was 0.71 (0.70 - 0.72) and 0.64 (0.63 - 0.65), respectively in diagnosis of HCC, and the corresponding pooled specificity (95% CI) was 0.90 (0.89 - 0.90) and 0.87 (0.87 - 0.88), respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of PIVKA-II and AFP was 0.89 (0.88 - 0.90) and 0.78 (0.77 - 0.79), respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that PIVKA-II presented higher AUC values compared to AFP in terms of ethnic group (African, European, Asian, and American patients), etiology (mixed-type HCC, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related, and hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related) and sample size of cases (≤ 100 and > 100).

Conclusion: This study reveals that PIVKA-II is a promising biomarker for identifying and tracking HCC, exhibiting greater accuracy than AFP. Our findings indicate that PIVKA-II outperforms AFP in detecting HCC across diverse racial groups and sample sizes, as well as in cases of HBV-related, HCV-related, or mixed-etiology HCC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Preventive Care and Rehabilitation Nursing on Elderly Hypertension Meta-analysis of In-stent Restenosis Factors after Coronary Intervention Effect of Dietary Carotenoids and Lutein on Eye Health Maintenance in Elderly People One Case of Solar Dermatitis Treated with Umbilical Needle "Four Positions" Combined with Body Acupuncture Primary Presacral Neuroendocrine Tumors Presented by Lumbosacral Pain: a Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1