Andrew C Majeste, Eva Tatum, Robin Christian, Michelle Palokas
{"title":"Glycemic control outcomes of manual and computerized insulin titration protocols: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Andrew C Majeste, Eva Tatum, Robin Christian, Michelle Palokas","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The object of this systematic review is to determine the effectiveness of computerized insulin titration protocols compared to manual insulin titration protocols for glycemic control in hospitalized adult patients.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hyperglycemia is common during acute illness, and current recommendations for patients with altered glucose metabolism is the use of intravenous insulin therapy. Due to the narrow therapeutic index of insulin, euglycemia is difficult to achieve and requires frequent dose titrations and blood glucose checks. Dose titrations can be accomplished through the use of manual or computerized insulin titration protocols.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider studies that compare manual and computerized insulin titration protocols for hospitalized adult patients requiring intravenous insulin therapy for hyperglycemia. Studies must have considered one or more glycemic control outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review will use the JBI methodology for evidence of effectiveness. The search will be limited to studies published in English from 1984, as this was the approximate year that the first pilot study of a computerized titration protocol was implemented. The databases to be searched include: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, Health Technology Assessments and Ovid Healthstar. The trial registers to be searched include: US National Library of Medicine (ClinicalTrials.gov). The search for unpublished studies will include ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and MedNar. Retrieval of full-text studies, assessment of methodological quality and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis will be performed if possible, and a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Summary of Findings presented.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration number: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42019142776.</p>","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":"17 8","pages":"1626-1633"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003866","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The object of this systematic review is to determine the effectiveness of computerized insulin titration protocols compared to manual insulin titration protocols for glycemic control in hospitalized adult patients.
Introduction: Hyperglycemia is common during acute illness, and current recommendations for patients with altered glucose metabolism is the use of intravenous insulin therapy. Due to the narrow therapeutic index of insulin, euglycemia is difficult to achieve and requires frequent dose titrations and blood glucose checks. Dose titrations can be accomplished through the use of manual or computerized insulin titration protocols.
Inclusion criteria: This review will consider studies that compare manual and computerized insulin titration protocols for hospitalized adult patients requiring intravenous insulin therapy for hyperglycemia. Studies must have considered one or more glycemic control outcomes.
Methods: This systematic review will use the JBI methodology for evidence of effectiveness. The search will be limited to studies published in English from 1984, as this was the approximate year that the first pilot study of a computerized titration protocol was implemented. The databases to be searched include: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, Health Technology Assessments and Ovid Healthstar. The trial registers to be searched include: US National Library of Medicine (ClinicalTrials.gov). The search for unpublished studies will include ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and MedNar. Retrieval of full-text studies, assessment of methodological quality and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis will be performed if possible, and a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Summary of Findings presented.
目的:本系统综述的目的是确定与人工胰岛素滴定方案相比,计算机胰岛素滴定方案对住院成人患者血糖控制的有效性。简介:高血糖在急性疾病中很常见,目前对于糖代谢改变的患者推荐使用静脉注射胰岛素治疗。由于胰岛素的治疗指标较窄,难以达到正常血糖,需要频繁的剂量滴定和血糖检查。剂量滴定可以通过使用手动或计算机胰岛素滴定方案来完成。纳入标准:本综述将考虑对需要静脉注射胰岛素治疗高血糖的住院成人患者进行人工和计算机胰岛素滴定方案比较的研究。研究必须考虑一个或多个血糖控制结果。方法:本系统综述将使用JBI方法作为有效性证据。检索将限于1984年以来用英文发表的研究,因为这是计算机滴定方案的第一次试点研究实施的大约一年。检索的数据库包括:Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、CINAHL、PubMed、Embase、Health Technology Assessments和Ovid Healthstar。要检索的试验注册包括:美国国家医学图书馆(ClinicalTrials.gov)。搜索未发表的研究将包括ProQuest的论文和论文,和MedNar。全文研究的检索、方法学质量评估和数据提取将由两名审稿人独立完成。如果可能的话,将进行荟萃分析,并提交一份建议、评估、发展和评价评分(GRADE)总结。系统评价注册号:PROSPERO CRD42019142776。