Adult patient and/or carer experiences of planning for hospital discharge after major trauma: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

Jeanette Collins, L. Lizarondo, K. Porritt
{"title":"Adult patient and/or carer experiences of planning for hospital discharge after major trauma: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Jeanette Collins, L. Lizarondo, K. Porritt","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo investigate patient and/or carer experiences of planning for discharge from an acute setting after a major trauma event.\n\n\nINTRODUCTION\nThe experience of injury through major trauma is a worldwide issue that affects people of any age. These patients often experience long-lasting disability. During discharge from the acute setting, patients are at a high risk of experiencing an adverse event due to the complex nature the process. This review aims to explore patient/carer opinion of their encounter with the discharge planning process following major trauma.\n\n\nINCLUSION CRITERIA\nThis review will consider studies that include patients aged between 18 and 65 who had major traumatic central nervous system injury or were allocated an Injury Severity Score >12, with demonstrated possibility of having an ongoing disability at least one year post-injury. Qualitative studies exploring patient and/or carer experiences of their participation in discharge planning from a trauma unit, acute ward or inpatient rehabilitation to a community setting will be included.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA three-stage search will be conducted and will include unpublished and gray literature. Databases to be searched include PubMed, Embase, PyscInfo, Scopus and CINAHL. Only studies published in English will be considered. Identified studies will be screened for inclusion in the review by two independent reviewers. Data will be extracted using a standardized tool and reviewers will discuss any disagreement. Data synthesis will adhere to the meta-aggregative approach to categorize findings. The categories will be synthesized into a set of findings that can be applied as evidence-based practice.\n\n\nSYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER\nPROSPERO CRD42019138431.","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To investigate patient and/or carer experiences of planning for discharge from an acute setting after a major trauma event. INTRODUCTION The experience of injury through major trauma is a worldwide issue that affects people of any age. These patients often experience long-lasting disability. During discharge from the acute setting, patients are at a high risk of experiencing an adverse event due to the complex nature the process. This review aims to explore patient/carer opinion of their encounter with the discharge planning process following major trauma. INCLUSION CRITERIA This review will consider studies that include patients aged between 18 and 65 who had major traumatic central nervous system injury or were allocated an Injury Severity Score >12, with demonstrated possibility of having an ongoing disability at least one year post-injury. Qualitative studies exploring patient and/or carer experiences of their participation in discharge planning from a trauma unit, acute ward or inpatient rehabilitation to a community setting will be included. METHODS A three-stage search will be conducted and will include unpublished and gray literature. Databases to be searched include PubMed, Embase, PyscInfo, Scopus and CINAHL. Only studies published in English will be considered. Identified studies will be screened for inclusion in the review by two independent reviewers. Data will be extracted using a standardized tool and reviewers will discuss any disagreement. Data synthesis will adhere to the meta-aggregative approach to categorize findings. The categories will be synthesized into a set of findings that can be applied as evidence-based practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO CRD42019138431.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人患者和/或护理人员在重大创伤后出院计划的经验:一个定性的系统评价方案。
目的调查重大创伤事件后急性出院计划的患者和/或护理人员经验。通过重大创伤的伤害经历是一个世界性的问题,影响着任何年龄的人。这些患者通常会经历长期的残疾。在急性出院期间,由于该过程的复杂性,患者处于经历不良事件的高风险中。本综述旨在探讨患者/护理人员对重大创伤后出院计划过程的看法。纳入标准:本综述将纳入年龄在18 - 65岁之间、有重大创伤性中枢神经系统损伤或损伤严重程度评分bbbb12,且在损伤后至少一年仍有持续残疾可能性的患者。定性研究探索患者和/或护理人员参与从创伤病房、急性病房或住院康复到社区环境的出院计划的经验将包括在内。方法进行三阶段检索,包括未发表的文献和灰色文献。检索数据库包括PubMed, Embase, PyscInfo, Scopus和CINAHL。只考虑以英文发表的研究。确定的研究将由两名独立审稿人筛选纳入本综述。数据将使用标准化工具提取,审稿人将讨论任何分歧。数据综合将坚持采用元聚合方法对研究结果进行分类。这些类别将被综合成一组可以作为循证实践应用的发现。系统评价注册号prospero crd42019138431。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol. Obesity and dental caries in early childhood: a systematic review protocol. Experiences of family caregivers caring for critically ill children hospitalized in a pediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Hernioplasty using low-cost mesh compared to surgical mesh in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol. Impact of clinical supervision of health professionals on organizational outcomes: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1