Perceptions and practices of community members relating to trachoma in Africa: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

Asahngwa Constantine Tanywe, Chelea Matchawe, Ritin Fernandez, Samuel Lapkin
{"title":"Perceptions and practices of community members relating to trachoma in Africa: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Asahngwa Constantine Tanywe,&nbsp;Chelea Matchawe,&nbsp;Ritin Fernandez,&nbsp;Samuel Lapkin","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review is to synthesize and present the best available evidence on community perceptions and practices relating to trachoma in Africa.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Globally, trachoma is the leading cause of blindness and is responsible for about 1.4% of all cases of blindness. The African continent is the worst affected, with about 1.9 million cases of trichiasis (61%). While interventions are currently being implemented to combat the disease in Africa, very little is known by decision makers about community perceptions and practices relating to trachoma, which may hinder successful implementation.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies with participants, regardless of their health status, gender, religion and ethnicity, aged 14 and over conducted in any African country, will be considered. Studies on Africans, conducted out of the continent and those involving healthcare professionals, will not be included in this review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative studies, published in English from 1996 onwards. will be considered. Databases to be searched will include, but not be limited to: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and PsycINFO. Study selection, critical appraisal and data extraction will be conducted by two independent reviewers, using the appropriate JBI methodology and any disagreement will be resolved by discussion or with a third reviewer. Qualitative findings will be synthesized using the appropriate JBI methodology, following the meta-aggregation approach. Where textual pooling is not possible, the findings will be presented in narrative form. The ConQual approach will be used to grade synthesized findings, and these will be presented in a Summary of Findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":"17 11","pages":"2350-2356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003820","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to synthesize and present the best available evidence on community perceptions and practices relating to trachoma in Africa.

Introduction: Globally, trachoma is the leading cause of blindness and is responsible for about 1.4% of all cases of blindness. The African continent is the worst affected, with about 1.9 million cases of trichiasis (61%). While interventions are currently being implemented to combat the disease in Africa, very little is known by decision makers about community perceptions and practices relating to trachoma, which may hinder successful implementation.

Inclusion criteria: Studies with participants, regardless of their health status, gender, religion and ethnicity, aged 14 and over conducted in any African country, will be considered. Studies on Africans, conducted out of the continent and those involving healthcare professionals, will not be included in this review.

Methods: Qualitative studies, published in English from 1996 onwards. will be considered. Databases to be searched will include, but not be limited to: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and PsycINFO. Study selection, critical appraisal and data extraction will be conducted by two independent reviewers, using the appropriate JBI methodology and any disagreement will be resolved by discussion or with a third reviewer. Qualitative findings will be synthesized using the appropriate JBI methodology, following the meta-aggregation approach. Where textual pooling is not possible, the findings will be presented in narrative form. The ConQual approach will be used to grade synthesized findings, and these will be presented in a Summary of Findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲社区成员对沙眼的认识和做法:一项定性系统审查方案。
目的:本系统综述的目的是综合并提出有关非洲社区对沙眼的认识和做法的最佳现有证据。在全球范围内,沙眼是导致失明的主要原因,约占所有失明病例的1.4%。非洲大陆受影响最严重,约有190万例倒睫病例(61%)。虽然目前正在非洲实施防治沙眼的干预措施,但决策者对社区对沙眼的看法和做法知之甚少,这可能会阻碍成功实施。纳入标准:将考虑在任何非洲国家进行的参与者的研究,无论其健康状况、性别、宗教和种族如何,年龄在14岁及以上。在非洲大陆以外进行的关于非洲人的研究以及涉及卫生保健专业人员的研究将不包括在本综述中。方法:定性研究,1996年起以英文发表。将予以考虑。要搜索的数据库包括但不限于:PubMed, CINAHL, Embase和PsycINFO。研究选择、关键评估和数据提取将由两名独立审稿人使用适当的JBI方法进行,任何分歧将通过讨论或与第三审稿人解决。将使用适当的JBI方法综合定性结果,遵循元聚合方法。如果文本汇集是不可能的,调查结果将以叙述的形式呈现。将使用征服方法对综合结果进行评分,这些结果将在研究结果摘要中提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol. Retention of doctors in emergency medicine: a scoping review protocol. Evaluations of health care delivery models in Australia: a scoping review protocol. Meaningful and culturally appropriate palliative care for Chinese immigrants with a terminal condition: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Experiences of outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation programs for persons with a mental illness: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1