Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography utilizing recent advances in technology in patients with high heart rates: a systematic review protocol.

Gordon T W Mander, Karen Dobeli, Caitlin Steffensen, Zachary Munn
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography utilizing recent advances in technology in patients with high heart rates: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Gordon T W Mander,&nbsp;Karen Dobeli,&nbsp;Caitlin Steffensen,&nbsp;Zachary Munn","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) using recent scan technologies for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) in adults with high heart rates.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Invasive coronary angiography is the gold standard for detecting significant CAD, but it is costly and carries risks of complications. Computed tomography coronary angiography has a high sensitivity for diagnosing CAD, although image quality may be affected by elevated heart rates. Recent technological advances in scanner design may increase the diagnostic accuracy of CTCA.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider diagnostic test accuracy studies that include adults 18 years and older with a heart rate greater than 65 beats per minute who have undergone CTCA to diagnose CAD (greater than 50% stenosis). Eligible studies will compare invasive coronary angiography with computed tomography scanner technologies that use either single- or dual-source scanner configuration in prospective electrocardiogram scan acquisition mode, and with a total scanner coverage equal to or greater than 128 detector-rows. Studies published in English from 2007 will be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus will be searched, along with Google Scholar, the NIHR-HTA register, computed tomography vendors and conference abstracts. Screening of potential titles and abstracts, retrieval of full-text studies, assessment of methodological quality and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses will be performed, if possible, and a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Summary of Findings presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003883","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) using recent scan technologies for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) in adults with high heart rates.

Introduction: Invasive coronary angiography is the gold standard for detecting significant CAD, but it is costly and carries risks of complications. Computed tomography coronary angiography has a high sensitivity for diagnosing CAD, although image quality may be affected by elevated heart rates. Recent technological advances in scanner design may increase the diagnostic accuracy of CTCA.

Inclusion criteria: This review will consider diagnostic test accuracy studies that include adults 18 years and older with a heart rate greater than 65 beats per minute who have undergone CTCA to diagnose CAD (greater than 50% stenosis). Eligible studies will compare invasive coronary angiography with computed tomography scanner technologies that use either single- or dual-source scanner configuration in prospective electrocardiogram scan acquisition mode, and with a total scanner coverage equal to or greater than 128 detector-rows. Studies published in English from 2007 will be considered.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus will be searched, along with Google Scholar, the NIHR-HTA register, computed tomography vendors and conference abstracts. Screening of potential titles and abstracts, retrieval of full-text studies, assessment of methodological quality and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses will be performed, if possible, and a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Summary of Findings presented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用最新技术对高心率患者进行计算机断层冠状动脉造影诊断的准确性:一项系统评价方案。
目的:本综述的目的是确定计算机断层冠状动脉造影(CTCA)使用最新的扫描技术检测成人高心率冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的诊断准确性。简介:有创冠状动脉造影是检测重要CAD的金标准,但其成本高且存在并发症风险。尽管图像质量可能受到心率升高的影响,但计算机断层冠状动脉造影对诊断CAD具有很高的灵敏度。最近扫描仪设计的技术进步可能会提高CTCA的诊断准确性。纳入标准:本综述将纳入18岁及以上、心率大于65次/分钟且行CTCA诊断CAD(狭窄大于50%)的成年人的诊断试验准确性研究。符合条件的研究将比较侵入性冠状动脉造影与计算机断层扫描技术,在前瞻性心电图扫描采集模式中使用单源或双源扫描仪配置,并且扫描仪的总覆盖范围等于或大于128行检测器。2007年以后发表的英文论文将被考虑。方法:检索PubMed, Embase, CINAHL和Scopus,以及Google Scholar, NIHR-HTA注册表,计算机断层扫描供应商和会议摘要。筛选潜在的题目和摘要、检索全文研究、评估方法质量和数据提取将由两名审稿人独立完成。如果可能的话,将进行荟萃分析,并提出建议、评估、发展和评价的分级(GRADE)结论摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol. Obesity and dental caries in early childhood: a systematic review protocol. Experiences of family caregivers caring for critically ill children hospitalized in a pediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Hernioplasty using low-cost mesh compared to surgical mesh in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol. Impact of clinical supervision of health professionals on organizational outcomes: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1