The impact of parent-targeted eHealth educational interventions on infant procedural pain management: a systematic review protocol.

Brianna Richardson, Britney Benoit, Kallen Rutledge, Justine Dol, Ruth Martin Misener, Margot Latimer, Michael Smit, Patrick McGrath, Marsha Campbell-Yeo
{"title":"The impact of parent-targeted eHealth educational interventions on infant procedural pain management: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Brianna Richardson,&nbsp;Britney Benoit,&nbsp;Kallen Rutledge,&nbsp;Justine Dol,&nbsp;Ruth Martin Misener,&nbsp;Margot Latimer,&nbsp;Michael Smit,&nbsp;Patrick McGrath,&nbsp;Marsha Campbell-Yeo","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to determine if electronic health (eHealth) educational interventions for infant procedural pain and pain management impact parental outcomes (mental health outcomes, knowledge utilization outcomes, and parental involvement in care outcomes) and infant outcomes (morbidity outcomes, pain outcomes, health system outcomes).</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pain in infants is a common concern for parents. Routine postpartum care for infants in early life requires them to endure painful procedures, yet infants often receive little to no pain management. While research has shown that parents can reduce their infant's pain during procedures by breastfeeding or skin-to-skin contact, parents may not be aware of their role in pain management. Despite the recent rapid increase in eHealth resources to educate parents about infant pain management, their impact has yet to be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider studies that include eHealth educational interventions targeted at parents during pregnancy and up to one year postpartum. All experimental study designs will be included. Primary outcomes will include: parental stress and anxiety, self-efficacy, knowledge, attitudes, eHealth intervention usage, acceptance of eHealth intervention, involvement in pain management, and infant pain response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO will be searched for studies published in English. Critical appraisal and data extraction will be conducted by two independent reviewers using standardized tools. Quantitative data, where possible, will be pooled in statistical meta-analysis, or if statistical pooling is not possible, the findings will be reported narratively.</p>","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":"17 8","pages":"1589-1599"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00007","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review is to determine if electronic health (eHealth) educational interventions for infant procedural pain and pain management impact parental outcomes (mental health outcomes, knowledge utilization outcomes, and parental involvement in care outcomes) and infant outcomes (morbidity outcomes, pain outcomes, health system outcomes).

Introduction: Pain in infants is a common concern for parents. Routine postpartum care for infants in early life requires them to endure painful procedures, yet infants often receive little to no pain management. While research has shown that parents can reduce their infant's pain during procedures by breastfeeding or skin-to-skin contact, parents may not be aware of their role in pain management. Despite the recent rapid increase in eHealth resources to educate parents about infant pain management, their impact has yet to be evaluated.

Inclusion criteria: This review will consider studies that include eHealth educational interventions targeted at parents during pregnancy and up to one year postpartum. All experimental study designs will be included. Primary outcomes will include: parental stress and anxiety, self-efficacy, knowledge, attitudes, eHealth intervention usage, acceptance of eHealth intervention, involvement in pain management, and infant pain response.

Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO will be searched for studies published in English. Critical appraisal and data extraction will be conducted by two independent reviewers using standardized tools. Quantitative data, where possible, will be pooled in statistical meta-analysis, or if statistical pooling is not possible, the findings will be reported narratively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以家长为目标的电子健康教育干预对婴儿程序性疼痛管理的影响:一项系统评价方案。
目的:本综述的目的是确定婴儿程序性疼痛和疼痛管理的电子健康(eHealth)教育干预是否会影响父母的结果(心理健康结果、知识利用结果和父母参与护理结果)和婴儿的结果(发病率结果、疼痛结果、卫生系统结果)。婴儿疼痛是父母共同关心的问题。婴儿早期的常规产后护理需要他们忍受痛苦的过程,但婴儿往往很少或根本没有疼痛管理。虽然研究表明,父母可以通过母乳喂养或皮肤接触来减轻婴儿在手术过程中的疼痛,但父母可能没有意识到他们在疼痛管理中的作用。尽管最近电子健康资源迅速增加,教育父母关于婴儿疼痛管理,其影响尚未得到评估。纳入标准:本综述将考虑包括针对怀孕期间和产后一年的父母的电子健康教育干预措施的研究。所有的实验研究设计都将包括在内。主要结局将包括:父母的压力和焦虑、自我效能、知识、态度、电子健康干预的使用、电子健康干预的接受程度、参与疼痛管理和婴儿疼痛反应。方法:检索PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO等英文文献。关键评估和数据提取将由两名独立审稿人使用标准化工具进行。定量数据,在可能的情况下,将汇集在统计荟萃分析中,或者如果统计汇集不可能,将以叙述的方式报告结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol. Retention of doctors in emergency medicine: a scoping review protocol. Evaluations of health care delivery models in Australia: a scoping review protocol. Meaningful and culturally appropriate palliative care for Chinese immigrants with a terminal condition: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Experiences of outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation programs for persons with a mental illness: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1