Sugammadex versus neostigmine for postoperative nausea and vomiting in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery paralyzed with rocuronium bromide: a systematic review protocol.

Angela Freundlich, Jennifer Badeaux, Marie Adorno
{"title":"Sugammadex versus neostigmine for postoperative nausea and vomiting in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery paralyzed with rocuronium bromide: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Angela Freundlich, Jennifer Badeaux, Marie Adorno","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this review is to determine if the occurrence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is affected by using sugammadex or neostigmine, in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures paralyzed by rocuronium bromide.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic procedures significantly increase the occurrence of PONV in patients. The focus should be on preventing the occurrence of PONV. Laparoscopic procedures use neo-muscular blocking agents to assist with creation of a pneumoperitoneum. After the procedure is complete, reversal of these agents is critical for patient recovery. Understanding the effects for each of the reversal medications is important for future decisions for peri-operative care.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider studies with patients aged 18 and older, undergoing laparoscopic procedures, paralyzed with rocuronium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search for relevant published and unpublished literature will be conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in addition to gray literature sources. Articles that meet the inclusion criteria will be further assessed for methodological validity by two independent reviewers using standardized critical appraisal instruments. Data will be extracted from papers included in the review using a standardized data extraction tool. Quantitative data will be pooled for statistical meta-analysis to evaluate the occurrence of PONV with both sugammadex and neostigmine.</p>","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":"17 10","pages":"2187-2192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this review is to determine if the occurrence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is affected by using sugammadex or neostigmine, in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures paralyzed by rocuronium bromide.

Introduction: Laparoscopic procedures significantly increase the occurrence of PONV in patients. The focus should be on preventing the occurrence of PONV. Laparoscopic procedures use neo-muscular blocking agents to assist with creation of a pneumoperitoneum. After the procedure is complete, reversal of these agents is critical for patient recovery. Understanding the effects for each of the reversal medications is important for future decisions for peri-operative care.

Inclusion criteria: This review will consider studies with patients aged 18 and older, undergoing laparoscopic procedures, paralyzed with rocuronium.

Methods: A search for relevant published and unpublished literature will be conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in addition to gray literature sources. Articles that meet the inclusion criteria will be further assessed for methodological validity by two independent reviewers using standardized critical appraisal instruments. Data will be extracted from papers included in the review using a standardized data extraction tool. Quantitative data will be pooled for statistical meta-analysis to evaluate the occurrence of PONV with both sugammadex and neostigmine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sugammadex与新斯的明对接受罗库溴铵麻痹腹腔镜手术的成人患者术后恶心和呕吐:一项系统评价方案。
目的:本综述的目的是确定在接受罗库溴铵麻痹腹腔镜手术的成年患者中,使用sugammadex或新斯的明是否会影响术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生。引言:腹腔镜手术显著增加患者PONV的发生率。重点应放在预防PONV的发生上。腹腔镜手术使用新型肌肉阻断剂来协助建立气腹。手术完成后,逆转这些药物对患者的康复至关重要。了解每种逆转药物的效果对未来围手术期护理的决策很重要。纳入标准:本综述将考虑对18岁及以上、接受腹腔镜手术、罗库麻痹的患者的研究。方法:除灰色文献来源外,还将在MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase、Scopus、ClinicalTrials.gov和Cochrane对照试验中央登记册(Central)上搜索相关已发表和未发表的文献。符合纳入标准的文章将由两名独立评审员使用标准化的批判性评估工具进一步评估方法的有效性。将使用标准化数据提取工具从审查中包含的论文中提取数据。将收集定量数据进行统计荟萃分析,以评估sugammadex和新斯的明的PONV发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol. Retention of doctors in emergency medicine: a scoping review protocol. Evaluations of health care delivery models in Australia: a scoping review protocol. Meaningful and culturally appropriate palliative care for Chinese immigrants with a terminal condition: a qualitative systematic review protocol. Experiences of outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation programs for persons with a mental illness: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1