Protein intake in cancer: Does it improve nutritional status and/or modify tumour response to chemotherapy?

IF 8.9 1区 医学 Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle Pub Date : 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1002/jcsm.13276
Martin Boutière, Cécile Cottet-Rousselle, Céline Coppard, Karine Couturier, Catherine Féart, Morgane Couchet, Christelle Corne, Christophe Moinard, Charlotte Breuillard
{"title":"Protein intake in cancer: Does it improve nutritional status and/or modify tumour response to chemotherapy?","authors":"Martin Boutière,&nbsp;Cécile Cottet-Rousselle,&nbsp;Céline Coppard,&nbsp;Karine Couturier,&nbsp;Catherine Féart,&nbsp;Morgane Couchet,&nbsp;Christelle Corne,&nbsp;Christophe Moinard,&nbsp;Charlotte Breuillard","doi":"10.1002/jcsm.13276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Combating malnutrition and cachexia is a core challenge in oncology. To limit muscle mass loss, the use of proteins in cancer is encouraged by experts in the field, but it is still debated due to their antagonist effects. Indeed, a high protein intake could preserve lean body mass but may promote tumour growth, whereas a low-protein diet could reduce tumour size but without addressing cachexia. Here we used a realistic rodent model of cancer and chemotherapy to evaluate the influence of different protein intakes on cachexia, tumour response to chemotherapy and immune system response. The goal is to gain a closer understanding of the effect of protein intake in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Female Fischer 344 rats were divided into six groups: five groups (<i>n</i> = 14 per group) with cancer (Ward colon tumour) and chemotherapy were fed with isocaloric diets with 8%, 12%, 16%, 24% or 32% of caloric intake from protein and one healthy control group (<i>n</i> = 8) fed a 16% protein diet, considered as a standard diet. Chemotherapy included two cycles, 1 week apart, each consisting of an injection of CPT-11 (50 mg/kg) followed by 5-fluorouracil (50 mg/kg) the day after. Food intake, body weight, and tumour size were measured daily. On day 9, the rats were euthanized and organs were weighed. Body composition was determined and protein content and protein synthesis (SUnSET method) were measured in the muscle, liver, intestine, and tumour. Immune function was explored by flow cytometry.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Cancer and chemotherapy led to a decrease in body weight characterized by a decrease of both fat mass (−56 ± 3%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) and fat-free mass (−8 ± 1%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). Surprisingly, there was no effect of protein diet on body composition, muscle or tumour parameters (weight, protein content, or protein synthesis) but a high cumulative protein intake was positively associated with a high relative body weight and high fat-free mass. The immune system was impacted by cancer and chemotherapy but not by the different amount of protein intake.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Using a realistic model of cancer and chemotherapy, we demonstrated for the first time that protein intake did not positively or negatively modulate tumour growth. Moreover, our results suggested that a high cumulative protein intake was able to improve moderately nutritional status in chemotherapy treated cancer rodents. Although this work cannot be evaluated clinically for ethical reasons, it nevertheless brings an essential contribution to nutrition management for cancer patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle","volume":"14 5","pages":"2003-2015"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcsm.13276","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcsm.13276","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Combating malnutrition and cachexia is a core challenge in oncology. To limit muscle mass loss, the use of proteins in cancer is encouraged by experts in the field, but it is still debated due to their antagonist effects. Indeed, a high protein intake could preserve lean body mass but may promote tumour growth, whereas a low-protein diet could reduce tumour size but without addressing cachexia. Here we used a realistic rodent model of cancer and chemotherapy to evaluate the influence of different protein intakes on cachexia, tumour response to chemotherapy and immune system response. The goal is to gain a closer understanding of the effect of protein intake in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Methods

Female Fischer 344 rats were divided into six groups: five groups (n = 14 per group) with cancer (Ward colon tumour) and chemotherapy were fed with isocaloric diets with 8%, 12%, 16%, 24% or 32% of caloric intake from protein and one healthy control group (n = 8) fed a 16% protein diet, considered as a standard diet. Chemotherapy included two cycles, 1 week apart, each consisting of an injection of CPT-11 (50 mg/kg) followed by 5-fluorouracil (50 mg/kg) the day after. Food intake, body weight, and tumour size were measured daily. On day 9, the rats were euthanized and organs were weighed. Body composition was determined and protein content and protein synthesis (SUnSET method) were measured in the muscle, liver, intestine, and tumour. Immune function was explored by flow cytometry.

Results

Cancer and chemotherapy led to a decrease in body weight characterized by a decrease of both fat mass (−56 ± 3%, P < 0.05) and fat-free mass (−8 ± 1%, P < 0.05). Surprisingly, there was no effect of protein diet on body composition, muscle or tumour parameters (weight, protein content, or protein synthesis) but a high cumulative protein intake was positively associated with a high relative body weight and high fat-free mass. The immune system was impacted by cancer and chemotherapy but not by the different amount of protein intake.

Conclusions

Using a realistic model of cancer and chemotherapy, we demonstrated for the first time that protein intake did not positively or negatively modulate tumour growth. Moreover, our results suggested that a high cumulative protein intake was able to improve moderately nutritional status in chemotherapy treated cancer rodents. Although this work cannot be evaluated clinically for ethical reasons, it nevertheless brings an essential contribution to nutrition management for cancer patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症的蛋白质摄入:它是否改善营养状况和/或改变肿瘤对化疗的反应?
背景:对抗营养不良和恶病质是肿瘤学的核心挑战。为了限制肌肉质量的损失,该领域的专家鼓励在癌症中使用蛋白质,但由于其拮抗作用,这一点仍存在争议。事实上,高蛋白摄入可以保持瘦体重,但可能促进肿瘤生长,而低蛋白饮食可以缩小肿瘤大小,但不会解决恶病质问题。在此,我们使用癌症和化疗的真实啮齿类动物模型来评估不同蛋白质摄入对恶病质、肿瘤对化疗的反应和免疫系统反应的影响。目的是更深入地了解癌症化疗患者蛋白质摄入的影响。方法:雌性Fischer 344大鼠分为6组:癌症(Ward结肠癌)和化疗的5组(每组n=14)喂食8%、12%、16%、24%或32%的蛋白质热量摄入的等热量饮食,健康对照组(n=8)喂食16%的蛋白质饮食,作为标准饮食。化疗包括两个周期,间隔1周,每个周期包括注射CPT-11(50 mg/kg),然后在第二天注射5-氟尿嘧啶(50 g/kg)。每天测量食物摄入量、体重和肿瘤大小。在第9天,对大鼠实施安乐死并称重器官。测定身体成分,并测量肌肉、肝脏、肠道和肿瘤中的蛋白质含量和蛋白质合成(SUnSET法)。流式细胞术检测免疫功能。结果:癌症和化疗导致体重下降,其特征是脂肪量减少(-56±3%,P结论:使用癌症和化疗的现实模型,我们首次证明蛋白质摄入不会对肿瘤生长产生积极或消极的调节作用。此外,我们的研究结果表明,高累积蛋白质摄入能够改善化疗治疗的癌症啮齿动物的中度营养状况。尽管这项工作无法在临床上进行评估然而,出于伦理原因,它为癌症患者的营养管理做出了重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
自引率
12.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia, and Muscle is a prestigious, peer-reviewed international publication committed to disseminating research and clinical insights pertaining to cachexia, sarcopenia, body composition, and the physiological and pathophysiological alterations occurring throughout the lifespan and in various illnesses across the spectrum of life sciences. This journal serves as a valuable resource for physicians, biochemists, biologists, dieticians, pharmacologists, and students alike.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Association Between Circulating Bilirubin Levels and the Risk of Frailty: An Observational and Mendelian Randomization Study. Body Composition and Incident High-Intensity Back Pain and/or High Disability: A 10-Year Prospective Population-Based Male Cohort Skeletal Muscle Index Changes on Locoregional Treatment Application After FOLFIRINOX and Survival in Pancreatic Cancer Skeletal Muscle 31P MR Spectroscopy Surpasses CT in Predicting Patient Survival After Liver Transplantation Associations of Muscle-Related Metrics With Respiratory Disease in Chinese Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1