Does Testicular Sperm Improve Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes for Nonazoospermic Infertile Men with Elevated Sperm DNA Fragmentation? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY European urology focus Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2023.08.008
{"title":"Does Testicular Sperm Improve Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes for Nonazoospermic Infertile Men with Elevated Sperm DNA Fragmentation? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2023.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>For nonazoospermic infertile men with elevated sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF), it is unclear whether the use of testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) may offer advantages over ejaculated sperm.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine whether ICSI outcomes (fertilisation rate, pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate) are better with testicular sperm than with ejaculated sperm for men with elevated SDF.</p></div><div><h3>Evidence acquisition</h3><p>We searched the Cochrane Central, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases (1946–2023) in February 2023 for relevant human comparative studies according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.</p></div><div><h3>Evidence synthesis</h3><p>Out of 2032 records, nine studies (more than 536 participants, mean age range 33–40.5 yr for males and 30.1–37.9 yr for females) were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled estimates demonstrated that the pregnancy rate was significantly higher with testicular than with ejaculated sperm according to a sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA)/sperm chromatin integrity test (SCIT) (odds ratio [OR] 2.51; <em>p</em> = 0.001) and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labelling (TUNEL) assays (OR 3.65; <em>p</em> = 0.005). The live birth rate was significantly higher according to SCSA/SCIT (OR 2.59; <em>p</em> = 0.005). There were no significant differences in the fertilisation rate or miscarriage rate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although significant improvements in pregnancy and live birth rates were observed with testicular sperm, the strength of findings is limited by availability and quality of evidence, both of which undermine recommendations for clinical practice. Standardised randomised controlled trials are needed to definitively determine whether the use of testicular sperm improves ISCI outcomes for men with high SDF. Until such evidence exists, ICSI after testicular sperm extraction or aspiration should not be routinely performed.</p></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><p>Our review showed that for infertile men with a high level of DNA damage in their sperm, use of sperm extracted from the testicles may give better results than ejaculated sperm for a particular IVF (in vitro fertilisation) technique. However, there is a lack of high-quality data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405456923001918","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

For nonazoospermic infertile men with elevated sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF), it is unclear whether the use of testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) may offer advantages over ejaculated sperm.

Objective

To determine whether ICSI outcomes (fertilisation rate, pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate) are better with testicular sperm than with ejaculated sperm for men with elevated SDF.

Evidence acquisition

We searched the Cochrane Central, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases (1946–2023) in February 2023 for relevant human comparative studies according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

Evidence synthesis

Out of 2032 records, nine studies (more than 536 participants, mean age range 33–40.5 yr for males and 30.1–37.9 yr for females) were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled estimates demonstrated that the pregnancy rate was significantly higher with testicular than with ejaculated sperm according to a sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA)/sperm chromatin integrity test (SCIT) (odds ratio [OR] 2.51; p = 0.001) and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labelling (TUNEL) assays (OR 3.65; p = 0.005). The live birth rate was significantly higher according to SCSA/SCIT (OR 2.59; p = 0.005). There were no significant differences in the fertilisation rate or miscarriage rate.

Conclusions

Although significant improvements in pregnancy and live birth rates were observed with testicular sperm, the strength of findings is limited by availability and quality of evidence, both of which undermine recommendations for clinical practice. Standardised randomised controlled trials are needed to definitively determine whether the use of testicular sperm improves ISCI outcomes for men with high SDF. Until such evidence exists, ICSI after testicular sperm extraction or aspiration should not be routinely performed.

Patient summary

Our review showed that for infertile men with a high level of DNA damage in their sperm, use of sperm extracted from the testicles may give better results than ejaculated sperm for a particular IVF (in vitro fertilisation) technique. However, there is a lack of high-quality data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
睾丸精子能改善精子 DNA 碎片升高的非氮精症不育男性的卵胞浆内单精子注射结果吗?系统回顾和元分析
背景对于精子 DNA 碎片率(SDF)升高的无精子症不育男性而言,使用睾丸精子进行卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)是否比射精精子更具优势尚不清楚。证据获取我们根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明,于 2023 年 2 月在 Cochrane Central、EMBASE、MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库(1946-2023 年)中检索了相关的人类比较研究。证据合成在 2032 条记录中,有 9 项研究(参与者超过 536 人,男性平均年龄在 33-40.5 岁之间,女性平均年龄在 30.1-37.9 岁之间)被纳入系统综述和荟萃分析。汇总估算结果显示,根据精子染色质结构检测(SCSA)/精子染色质完整性检测(SCIT)(几率比 [OR] 2.51;P = 0.001)和末端脱氧核苷酸转移酶 dUTP 镍端标记(TUNEL)检测(OR 3.65;P = 0.005),睾丸精子的怀孕率明显高于射出精子。SCSA/SCIT的活产率明显更高(OR 2.59;p = 0.005)。结论虽然使用睾丸精子可显著提高怀孕率和活产率,但由于证据的可用性和质量问题,研究结果的说服力受到限制,这两点都不利于临床实践建议。需要进行标准化随机对照试验,以明确确定使用睾丸精子是否能改善高SDF男性的ISCI结果。我们的综述显示,对于精子中DNA损伤程度较高的不育男性来说,在特定的体外受精(IVF)技术中,使用从睾丸中提取的精子可能比射精的精子效果更好。不过,目前还缺乏高质量的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Belzutifan Efficacy and Tolerability in Patients with Sporadic Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clinical Impact of the CARMENA Trial on Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Practices in the USA: A Difference-in-differences Analysis. Comparative Effectiveness of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin and Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel for Treatment-naïve Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Learning Curve for Single-port Robot-assisted Urological Surgery: Single-center Experience and Implications for Adoption. Stapled W-shaped (Hautmann) Orthotopic Ileal Neobladder. Functional Results and Complications over a 13-year Period.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1