Extending Validation of a Social Emotional Health Measure For Middle School Students.

Michael J Furlong, Jennica L Paz, Delwin Carter, Erin Dowdy, Karen Nylund-Gibson
{"title":"Extending Validation of a Social Emotional Health Measure For Middle School Students.","authors":"Michael J Furlong,&nbsp;Jennica L Paz,&nbsp;Delwin Carter,&nbsp;Erin Dowdy,&nbsp;Karen Nylund-Gibson","doi":"10.1007/s40688-022-00411-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Social Emotional Health Survey-Secondary-2020 (SEHS-S-2020) is a well-studied option for assessing social emotional health to support students within a multitiered system of school support. While a growing body of literature supports the SEHS-S-2020 measure for assessing student covitality, there is less validation evidence specifically for middle-school-aged students. The present study aimed to fill this gap in the literature by examining its use for younger adolescents. Study participants were from two samples, including a cross-sectional sample with 9,426 students in Grades 7-8 from 32 counties in California and a longitudinal sample with 414 students in Grades 6-8 from two middle schools. Data analyses examined structural validity, internal consistency, measurement invariance, criterion validity, predictive validity, and response stability. Results indicate excellent fit indices for a four-level higher-order measurement model, with adequate concurrent and one-year predictive validity coefficients, supporting the use of the SEHS-S-2020 measure with young adolescents in middle school settings. The discussion focuses on implications for assessing students' psychosocial assets, universal school-based screening, and cultural and intersectionality considerations when interpreting SEHS-S-2020 responses.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40688-022-00411-x.</p>","PeriodicalId":72700,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary school psychology","volume":"27 1","pages":"92-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8941839/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary school psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-022-00411-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Social Emotional Health Survey-Secondary-2020 (SEHS-S-2020) is a well-studied option for assessing social emotional health to support students within a multitiered system of school support. While a growing body of literature supports the SEHS-S-2020 measure for assessing student covitality, there is less validation evidence specifically for middle-school-aged students. The present study aimed to fill this gap in the literature by examining its use for younger adolescents. Study participants were from two samples, including a cross-sectional sample with 9,426 students in Grades 7-8 from 32 counties in California and a longitudinal sample with 414 students in Grades 6-8 from two middle schools. Data analyses examined structural validity, internal consistency, measurement invariance, criterion validity, predictive validity, and response stability. Results indicate excellent fit indices for a four-level higher-order measurement model, with adequate concurrent and one-year predictive validity coefficients, supporting the use of the SEHS-S-2020 measure with young adolescents in middle school settings. The discussion focuses on implications for assessing students' psychosocial assets, universal school-based screening, and cultural and intersectionality considerations when interpreting SEHS-S-2020 responses.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40688-022-00411-x.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中学生社会情绪健康量表的扩展验证。
社会情绪健康调查-中学-2020 (SEHS-S-2020)是一个经过充分研究的选项,用于评估社会情绪健康,以支持学生在多层次的学校支持系统中。虽然越来越多的文献支持SEHS-S-2020评估学生共同活力的措施,但专门针对中学生的验证证据较少。本研究旨在填补这一空白,通过检查其在青少年中的使用。研究参与者来自两个样本,包括来自加利福尼亚州32个县的9,426名7-8年级学生的横断面样本和来自两所中学的414名6-8年级学生的纵向样本。数据分析检验了结构效度、内部一致性、测量不变性、标准效度、预测效度和反应稳定性。结果表明,四水平高阶测量模型具有良好的拟合指标,具有足够的并发效度和一年预测效度系数,支持在中学青少年中使用SEHS-S-2020量表。讨论的重点是在解释SEHS-S-2020反应时评估学生的社会心理资产、普遍的校本筛查以及文化和交叉性考虑的影响。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址为10.1007/s40688-022-00411-x。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Concurrent Validity of the GORT-5 with the WJ-IV Mental Health Screening: Recommendations from an Integrated Literature Review Lessons Learned from LGBTQ + Youths’ Experience in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Phenomenological Investigation Spirituality and Social-Emotional Learning: A Qualitative Examination of Teachers’ Perspectives Measuring School Climate as a Component of School Capacity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1