Cost comparison for flip chip, gold wire bond, and copper wire bond packaging

C. Palesko, E. J. Vardaman
{"title":"Cost comparison for flip chip, gold wire bond, and copper wire bond packaging","authors":"C. Palesko, E. J. Vardaman","doi":"10.1109/ECTC.2010.5490877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When the cost of gold was $500 per ounce, the lowest cost packaging choice was clear-it was always gold wire bonding. However, with the cost of gold at more than $1,000 per ounce and significant cost decreases in flip chip package fabrication and assembly, the lowest cost packaging choice is no longer obvious. Gold wire bonding is one of the oldest and most mature process, and offers high yields and low processing costs1. Copper wire bonding is an alternative to save material cost, but is less mature and requires equipment modifications2. Historically, flip chip packages have only been cost effective for area-constrained applications given the additional wafer bumping cost and the high substrate cost. However, wafer bumping costs have decreased significantly in the past few years and low-cost flip chip substrates are now available in the market. This poster presentation will compare the total packaging cost from wafer preparation through final package assembly. The analysis will be done using a comprehensive activity based cost model for each of the three package technologies. All wafer preparation activities (bumping for flip chip, wafer mounting, backgrind, dicing, etc.), substrate fabrication activities (inner layer processing, build-up layer processing, drilling, surface finish, testing, singulation, etc.), and assembly activities (die bonding, wire bonding, underfill, mold compound, lid attach, solder ball attach, etc.) have been modeled and verified using multiple industry sources.","PeriodicalId":429629,"journal":{"name":"2010 Proceedings 60th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)","volume":"3 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Proceedings 60th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2010.5490877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

When the cost of gold was $500 per ounce, the lowest cost packaging choice was clear-it was always gold wire bonding. However, with the cost of gold at more than $1,000 per ounce and significant cost decreases in flip chip package fabrication and assembly, the lowest cost packaging choice is no longer obvious. Gold wire bonding is one of the oldest and most mature process, and offers high yields and low processing costs1. Copper wire bonding is an alternative to save material cost, but is less mature and requires equipment modifications2. Historically, flip chip packages have only been cost effective for area-constrained applications given the additional wafer bumping cost and the high substrate cost. However, wafer bumping costs have decreased significantly in the past few years and low-cost flip chip substrates are now available in the market. This poster presentation will compare the total packaging cost from wafer preparation through final package assembly. The analysis will be done using a comprehensive activity based cost model for each of the three package technologies. All wafer preparation activities (bumping for flip chip, wafer mounting, backgrind, dicing, etc.), substrate fabrication activities (inner layer processing, build-up layer processing, drilling, surface finish, testing, singulation, etc.), and assembly activities (die bonding, wire bonding, underfill, mold compound, lid attach, solder ball attach, etc.) have been modeled and verified using multiple industry sources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
倒装芯片、金线键合和铜线键合封装的成本比较
当黄金的成本为每盎司500美元时,成本最低的包装选择是显而易见的——总是金丝粘合。然而,随着黄金的成本超过每盎司1000美元,以及倒装芯片封装制造和组装成本的显著下降,最低成本的封装选择不再明显。金丝键合是最古老、最成熟的工艺之一,产量高,加工成本低。铜线粘接是一种节省材料成本的替代方法,但不太成熟,需要对设备进行改造。从历史上看,考虑到额外的晶圆碰撞成本和高衬底成本,倒装芯片封装仅在面积受限的应用中具有成本效益。然而,晶圆碰撞成本在过去几年中显著下降,现在市场上有低成本的倒装芯片基板。这张海报将比较从晶圆准备到最终封装组装的总封装成本。对三种封装技术中的每一种进行综合的基于活动的成本模型分析。所有晶圆制备活动(倒装芯片的碰撞、晶圆安装、背景研磨、切割等)、基板制造活动(内层处理、堆积层处理、钻孔、表面处理、测试、模拟等)和组装活动(模具粘合、线粘合、下填充、模具复合、盖连接、焊球连接等)都已使用多个行业来源进行了建模和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of CMOS-process-compatible interconnect technology for 3D-stacking of NAND flash memory chips Inductance properties of silicon-in-grown horizontal carbon nanotubes Direct chip powering and enhancement of proximity communication through Anisotropic Conductive adhesive chip-to-chip bonding Cost comparison for flip chip, gold wire bond, and copper wire bond packaging An investigation of reliability and solder joint microstructure evolution of select Pb-free FCBGA pad finish and solder ball alloy combinations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1