Validating software metrics: producing quality discriminators

N. Schneidewind
{"title":"Validating software metrics: producing quality discriminators","authors":"N. Schneidewind","doi":"10.1109/ISSRE.1991.145385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author proposes a comprehensive metrics validation methodology that has six validation criteria, each of which supports certain quality functions. New criteria are defined and illustrated, including consistency, discrimination power, tracking, and repeatability. He shows that certain nonparametric statistical methods like contingency tables play an important role in evaluating metrics against the validity criteria. A detailed example emphasizing the discriminative power validity criterion is presented.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":338844,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 1991 International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering","volume":"325 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 1991 International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSRE.1991.145385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The author proposes a comprehensive metrics validation methodology that has six validation criteria, each of which supports certain quality functions. New criteria are defined and illustrated, including consistency, discrimination power, tracking, and repeatability. He shows that certain nonparametric statistical methods like contingency tables play an important role in evaluating metrics against the validity criteria. A detailed example emphasizing the discriminative power validity criterion is presented.<>
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证软件度量:产生质量鉴别器
作者提出了一个全面的度量验证方法,它有六个验证标准,每个标准都支持特定的质量功能。新的标准被定义和说明,包括一致性,辨别能力,跟踪和可重复性。他表明,某些非参数统计方法,如列联表,在根据有效性标准评估度量时起着重要作用。给出了一个详细的例子,强调了判别力效度准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validating software metrics: producing quality discriminators Practical applications of software reliability models A new Markov model of N version programming systems Formal specifications and reliability: an experimental study Software reliability practices at Cray Research Inc
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1