La lex Calpurnia, le Sénat et les alliés de Rome

A. Giovannini
{"title":"La lex Calpurnia, le Sénat et les alliés de Rome","authors":"A. Giovannini","doi":"10.3406/ccgg.2014.1813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lex Calpurnia de pecuniis repetundis of 149 BC establisehd a permanent court that allowed victims of exactions and other mischief committed by officials (magistrates or promagistrates) of the Roman people to request compensation for damage. The first aim of this article is to establish, through an exhaustive review of known cases, the nature of those exactions and other mischief committed by officials before the lex Calpurnia was issued, and to identify the victims of such deeds. This review shows that, in almost every case, those responsible for such mischief were military commanders who had abused their position mainly – but not exclusively – at the expense of Rome’s allies and friends. Represssing such abuse was a matter of foreign policy, a task that lay in the hands of the Senate. Since foreign policy remained in the hands of the Senate till the end of the Republic, one can conclude from this review that the lex Calpurnia did not deprive the Senate of its responsibility for protecting Rome’s allies and friends, and that it was solely by appealing to the Senate that those could request compensation through the quaestio de repetundis. It is known through the senatusconsultum Caluisianum of 4 BC that this was the procedure followed under the reign of Augustus ; and most probably this was already the case as soon as the lex Calpurnia was issued.","PeriodicalId":170604,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","volume":"23 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.2014.1813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lex Calpurnia de pecuniis repetundis of 149 BC establisehd a permanent court that allowed victims of exactions and other mischief committed by officials (magistrates or promagistrates) of the Roman people to request compensation for damage. The first aim of this article is to establish, through an exhaustive review of known cases, the nature of those exactions and other mischief committed by officials before the lex Calpurnia was issued, and to identify the victims of such deeds. This review shows that, in almost every case, those responsible for such mischief were military commanders who had abused their position mainly – but not exclusively – at the expense of Rome’s allies and friends. Represssing such abuse was a matter of foreign policy, a task that lay in the hands of the Senate. Since foreign policy remained in the hands of the Senate till the end of the Republic, one can conclude from this review that the lex Calpurnia did not deprive the Senate of its responsibility for protecting Rome’s allies and friends, and that it was solely by appealing to the Senate that those could request compensation through the quaestio de repetundis. It is known through the senatusconsultum Caluisianum of 4 BC that this was the procedure followed under the reign of Augustus ; and most probably this was already the case as soon as the lex Calpurnia was issued.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡尔珀尼亚法,元老院和罗马的盟友
公元前149年的《财政法》(lex Calpurnia de pecuniis repetundis)建立了一个常设法庭,允许罗马人民的官员(地方长官或地方长官)征收和其他损害行为的受害者要求赔偿损失。本文的第一个目的是,通过对已知案件的详尽审查,确定在颁布《卡尔珀尼亚法》之前官员所犯的这些勒索和其他罪行的性质,并查明这种行为的受害者。这一回顾表明,在几乎所有的情况下,这些恶作剧的责任人都是军事指挥官,他们滥用职权,主要(但不完全)损害罗马的盟友和朋友的利益。压制这种滥用是外交政策的问题,是参议院的任务。由于外交政策一直到共和国末期都掌握在元老院的手中,我们可以从这一回顾中得出结论,卡尔珀尼亚法并没有剥夺元老院保护罗马盟友和朋友的责任,只有通过向元老院上诉,这些人才可以通过“问人问题”(questio de repetundis)要求赔偿。公元前4年的元老院会议(senatusconsultum Caluisianum)表明,这是奥古斯都统治时期所遵循的程序;很可能在《卡尔珀尼亚法》颁布之时,情况就已经如此了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virgile en Orient : formes et circulation de l’Énéide dans la Pars Orientis de l’Empire (Ier-VIe siècles) Paratextual readings of imperial discourse in the Res Gestae divi Augusti La suprématie auspiciale du prince en question(s). Une nouvelle hiérarchie des auspices La lex Calpurnia, le Sénat et les alliés de Rome L’appellation Caesaris (Uxor) dans les témoignages épigraphiques et littéraires sur Scribonia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1