Performance Comparison of Big Data Processing Utilizing SciDB and Apache Accumulo Databases

Mohammad Abu Mhana, Alá F. Khalifeh, S. Alouneh
{"title":"Performance Comparison of Big Data Processing Utilizing SciDB and Apache Accumulo Databases","authors":"Mohammad Abu Mhana, Alá F. Khalifeh, S. Alouneh","doi":"10.1109/FMEC57183.2022.10062513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Big data deals with processing massive, complex data sets and data volumes that incorporate a tremendous amount of information. Therefore, researchers created several methods, models, and databases to deal with such big data, among them is the Apache Accumulo database, which is considered an in-storage database reliant on the Hadoop processing framework to give the ability to analyze and process the data. Another big data database that is widely used in the research community is SciDB which stands for the scientific database. SciDB utilizes a PostgreSQL connection, to establish a reliable link with the database. In this paper, we will analyze and evaluate the performance of these two database systems that are specialized in handling big data and storing them for further processing and analysis. The databases' performance will be analyzed in terms of several metrics such as CPU utilization, data storing/retrieval delay, disk utilization, and the number of data ingestions per second. Furthermore, the setup and integration of the two databases are investigated. Our performance evaluation revealed the advantages and disadvantages of each database structure. Where it has been found that Apache Accumulo DB has the best performance compared with SciDB in terms of average ingestion execution time, the number of ingestions per second, and CPU utilization. Whereas, SciDB has the lowest disk utilization compared to Apache Accumulo.","PeriodicalId":129184,"journal":{"name":"2022 Seventh International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Seventh International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMEC57183.2022.10062513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Big data deals with processing massive, complex data sets and data volumes that incorporate a tremendous amount of information. Therefore, researchers created several methods, models, and databases to deal with such big data, among them is the Apache Accumulo database, which is considered an in-storage database reliant on the Hadoop processing framework to give the ability to analyze and process the data. Another big data database that is widely used in the research community is SciDB which stands for the scientific database. SciDB utilizes a PostgreSQL connection, to establish a reliable link with the database. In this paper, we will analyze and evaluate the performance of these two database systems that are specialized in handling big data and storing them for further processing and analysis. The databases' performance will be analyzed in terms of several metrics such as CPU utilization, data storing/retrieval delay, disk utilization, and the number of data ingestions per second. Furthermore, the setup and integration of the two databases are investigated. Our performance evaluation revealed the advantages and disadvantages of each database structure. Where it has been found that Apache Accumulo DB has the best performance compared with SciDB in terms of average ingestion execution time, the number of ingestions per second, and CPU utilization. Whereas, SciDB has the lowest disk utilization compared to Apache Accumulo.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于SciDB和Apache Accumulo数据库的大数据处理性能比较
大数据处理大量复杂的数据集和包含大量信息的数据量。因此,研究人员创建了几种方法、模型和数据库来处理这种大数据,其中包括Apache Accumulo数据库,它被认为是一种依赖于Hadoop处理框架的存储数据库,以提供分析和处理数据的能力。另一个在研究界广泛使用的大数据数据库是SciDB,即科学数据库。SciDB利用PostgreSQL连接,与数据库建立可靠的链接。在本文中,我们将分析和评估这两个专门处理大数据并存储以供进一步处理和分析的数据库系统的性能。数据库的性能将根据几个指标进行分析,例如CPU利用率、数据存储/检索延迟、磁盘利用率和每秒数据摄取的数量。此外,还研究了两个数据库的建立和集成。我们的性能评估揭示了每种数据库结构的优缺点。在平均摄取执行时间、每秒摄取的数量和CPU利用率方面,Apache Accumulo DB与SciDB相比具有最佳性能。然而,与Apache Accumulo相比,SciDB的磁盘利用率最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Performance Comparison of Big Data Processing Utilizing SciDB and Apache Accumulo Databases Proposal of a Context-aware Task Scheduling Algorithm for the Fog Paradigm Fine-Tuned Access Control for Internet of Things EdgeFNF: Toward Real-time Fake News Detection on Mobile Edge Computing Evaluating Amazon EC2 Spot Price Prediction Models Using Regression Error Characteristic Curve
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1