{"title":"The Construction of Transcurricular Competencies in Algerian EFL Course: A Textbook Analysis","authors":"Amar Guendouzi, Hamid Ameziane","doi":"10.60149/rahl7446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper looks into the implementation of the interdisciplinary curriculum in Algerian EFL course from the perspectives of both broad areas of learning and learning process. It analyses two textbooks, Spotlight on English Book 3 and Getting Through, belonging respectively to the middle and secondary school levels. The analysis shows that the designers have adopted the Interpretation, Constructivist Design (ICON) Model (O’Mallet and Chamot 1990) and restricted its use to the strategy of generating and testing hypotheses. Our main findings underscore the constructivist orientation of the curriculum and underline three important flaws in the textbooks: one, the activities are not purposive in questioning for information and cooperation; two, the generating strategy serves as a learning strategy rather than as a learning process; three, the stages of multiple interpretations and manifestations are rarely attained, leaving little opportunity for knowledge transfer to real life contexts.","PeriodicalId":280959,"journal":{"name":"CALR Linguistics Journal - Issue 4","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CALR Linguistics Journal - Issue 4","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60149/rahl7446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper looks into the implementation of the interdisciplinary curriculum in Algerian EFL course from the perspectives of both broad areas of learning and learning process. It analyses two textbooks, Spotlight on English Book 3 and Getting Through, belonging respectively to the middle and secondary school levels. The analysis shows that the designers have adopted the Interpretation, Constructivist Design (ICON) Model (O’Mallet and Chamot 1990) and restricted its use to the strategy of generating and testing hypotheses. Our main findings underscore the constructivist orientation of the curriculum and underline three important flaws in the textbooks: one, the activities are not purposive in questioning for information and cooperation; two, the generating strategy serves as a learning strategy rather than as a learning process; three, the stages of multiple interpretations and manifestations are rarely attained, leaving little opportunity for knowledge transfer to real life contexts.
本文从广泛的学习领域和学习过程两个角度探讨了跨学科课程在阿尔及利亚英语课程中的实施。本文分析了两本分别属于初中和初中水平的教材《聚焦英语》和《穿越》。分析表明,设计师们采用了解释、建构主义设计(ICON)模型(O’mallet and Chamot 1990),并将其使用限制在产生和检验假设的策略上。我们的主要研究结果强调了课程的建构主义取向,并强调了教科书的三个重要缺陷:一是活动在提问信息和合作方面没有目的性;第二,生成策略是一种学习策略,而不是一个学习过程;第三,很少达到多种解释和表现的阶段,很少有机会将知识转移到现实生活环境中。