A Phenomenological Study of Online Assessment Perceptions of Macao Higher Learning Institutions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: :Dual Perspectives of Students and Instructors

Hongfeng Zhang, K. Li, J. Lam
{"title":"A Phenomenological Study of Online Assessment Perceptions of Macao Higher Learning Institutions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: :Dual Perspectives of Students and Instructors","authors":"Hongfeng Zhang, K. Li, J. Lam","doi":"10.1145/3528137.3528151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online assessment is the key issue of studying online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Often, online assessments are understood as the mirror to face-to-face learning assessments. In fact, online assessment should start from the premise that all interactive learning strategies are assessment strategies, and as such should be considered for their value in measuring the experiences of students and instructors. This study used the phenomenological method of qualitative research through in-depth interviews with 14 college students and 6 instructors. Based on this, it explored the perception of online assessment in Macao higher learning institutions from the complementary perspectives of college students and instructors, and constructed a theoretical model. The main research findings are that after the assessment shifted from offline to online, some new features appeared, and corresponding changes in form and function occurred. Formally, online assessment is manifested as single subjectivity and flexible diversity, which leads to the assessment dilemma of lack of constructive alignment. At the same time, the functions of assessment have also been extended and even alienated. So the effect of online assessment is not satisfactory. The recommendations for the development of the technological environment and the changes of formative and summative assessment are also discussed in this paper. In terms of the technological environment, efforts need to be made to provide more authentic online learning experiences with synchronous feedback and flexible interaction. In order to help develop a holistic person with online learning, which is the ultimate goal of learning, corresponding criterion-referenced assessment and functions of assessment should be improved accordingly to promote student learning while considering students’ recognition and facilitate the co-construction of knowledge between instructors and students. In addition, future research can focus on the development of the readiness of assessment technology, as well as the form and purpose of assessment. Overall, this study provides a more comprehensive understanding of online learning and assessment from the dual perspectives of instructors and students, which could help further studies in this field.","PeriodicalId":440758,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Education Development and Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Education Development and Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3528137.3528151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Online assessment is the key issue of studying online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Often, online assessments are understood as the mirror to face-to-face learning assessments. In fact, online assessment should start from the premise that all interactive learning strategies are assessment strategies, and as such should be considered for their value in measuring the experiences of students and instructors. This study used the phenomenological method of qualitative research through in-depth interviews with 14 college students and 6 instructors. Based on this, it explored the perception of online assessment in Macao higher learning institutions from the complementary perspectives of college students and instructors, and constructed a theoretical model. The main research findings are that after the assessment shifted from offline to online, some new features appeared, and corresponding changes in form and function occurred. Formally, online assessment is manifested as single subjectivity and flexible diversity, which leads to the assessment dilemma of lack of constructive alignment. At the same time, the functions of assessment have also been extended and even alienated. So the effect of online assessment is not satisfactory. The recommendations for the development of the technological environment and the changes of formative and summative assessment are also discussed in this paper. In terms of the technological environment, efforts need to be made to provide more authentic online learning experiences with synchronous feedback and flexible interaction. In order to help develop a holistic person with online learning, which is the ultimate goal of learning, corresponding criterion-referenced assessment and functions of assessment should be improved accordingly to promote student learning while considering students’ recognition and facilitate the co-construction of knowledge between instructors and students. In addition, future research can focus on the development of the readiness of assessment technology, as well as the form and purpose of assessment. Overall, this study provides a more comprehensive understanding of online learning and assessment from the dual perspectives of instructors and students, which could help further studies in this field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎疫情期间澳门高等院校在线评估认知的现象学研究:学生与教师的双重视角
在线评估是新冠肺炎大流行期间在线学习研究的关键问题。通常,在线评估被理解为面对面学习评估的镜子。事实上,在线评估应该以所有互动学习策略都是评估策略为前提,因此应该考虑到它们在衡量学生和教师经验方面的价值。本研究采用质性研究的现象学方法,对14名大学生和6名教师进行深度访谈。在此基础上,从大学生和教师互补的角度探讨澳门高校对网络评估的认知,并构建理论模型。主要研究发现,测评从线下转向线上后,出现了一些新的特征,在形式和功能上都发生了相应的变化。形式上,在线评估表现为单一主观性和灵活多样性,导致缺乏建设性一致性的评估困境。与此同时,评价的功能也被延伸甚至异化。因此,在线评估的效果并不令人满意。本文还对技术环境的发展以及形成性评价和总结性评价的变化提出了建议。就技术环境而言,需要努力提供更真实的在线学习体验,并提供同步反馈和灵活的交互。为了使作为学习终极目标的在线学习成为全人,应相应完善相应的标准参照评价和评价功能,在促进学生学习的同时兼顾学生的认知,促进教师与学生之间的知识共建。此外,未来的研究可以关注评估技术的发展准备程度,以及评估的形式和目的。总的来说,本研究从教师和学生的双重视角对在线学习和评估有了更全面的认识,有助于该领域的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Phenomenological Study of Online Assessment Perceptions of Macao Higher Learning Institutions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: :Dual Perspectives of Students and Instructors The Mediation Role of Executive Function in the Relationship between Physical Wellbeing and Cognitive Outcomes among Preschool Children Development of Information Literacy in Contemporary Vocational Education: Review and Prospect: Contrastive Analysis Based on the Differences between Chinese and Foreign Literatures An Analysis of the Themes and Trends of School-based Teaching Research in China's Basic Education: Based on CiteSpace bibliometric analysis Simulation Research on Intervention Model of Higher Vocational Students’ Crisis Behavior under Network Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1