A comparative study up to 1024 bit Euclid's GCD algorithm FPGA implementation and synthesizing

Qasem Abu Al-Haija, Monther Al-Ja'fari, M. Smadi
{"title":"A comparative study up to 1024 bit Euclid's GCD algorithm FPGA implementation and synthesizing","authors":"Qasem Abu Al-Haija, Monther Al-Ja'fari, M. Smadi","doi":"10.1109/ICEDSA.2016.7818535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we are targeting Altera Cyclone IV FPGA family to design an efficient GCD (Greatest Common Divisor) coprocessor based on Euclid's method with variable datapath sizes. The design was synthesized using seven chip technologies in terms of maximum frequency and critical path delay of the coprocessor. As a result, the comparison between different FPGA devices shows that Xilinx devices XC7VH290T-2-HCG1155 as well as XC7K70T-2-FBG676 recorded the best values of maximum frequencies of243.934 MHz down to 39.94 MHz for 32 bit and 1024 bit datapaths, respectively. Finally, the comparison with previous designs illustrates that the proposed coprocessor design has a throughput efficiency of even two times faster than other designs. Hence, the proposed work will help the FPGA system designers to better utilize the hardware performance for many applications such as cryptosystems design.","PeriodicalId":247318,"journal":{"name":"2016 5th International Conference on Electronic Devices, Systems and Applications (ICEDSA)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 5th International Conference on Electronic Devices, Systems and Applications (ICEDSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDSA.2016.7818535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In this paper, we are targeting Altera Cyclone IV FPGA family to design an efficient GCD (Greatest Common Divisor) coprocessor based on Euclid's method with variable datapath sizes. The design was synthesized using seven chip technologies in terms of maximum frequency and critical path delay of the coprocessor. As a result, the comparison between different FPGA devices shows that Xilinx devices XC7VH290T-2-HCG1155 as well as XC7K70T-2-FBG676 recorded the best values of maximum frequencies of243.934 MHz down to 39.94 MHz for 32 bit and 1024 bit datapaths, respectively. Finally, the comparison with previous designs illustrates that the proposed coprocessor design has a throughput efficiency of even two times faster than other designs. Hence, the proposed work will help the FPGA system designers to better utilize the hardware performance for many applications such as cryptosystems design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较研究了高达1024位Euclid的GCD算法的FPGA实现和合成
在本文中,我们针对Altera Cyclone IV FPGA家族设计了一种基于可变数据路径大小的欧几里得方法的高效GCD(最大公约数)协处理器。根据协处理器的最大频率和关键路径延迟,综合了7种芯片技术。因此,不同FPGA器件之间的比较表明,Xilinx器件XC7VH290T-2-HCG1155和XC7K70T-2-FBG676在32位和1024位数据路径下分别记录了243.934 MHz至39.94 MHz的最大频率的最佳值。最后,与先前设计的比较表明,所提出的协处理器设计具有比其他设计快两倍的吞吐量效率。因此,所提出的工作将有助于FPGA系统设计者在许多应用中更好地利用硬件性能,例如密码系统设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Noise robust speech recognition using parallel model compensation and voice activity detection methods Analysis and design of MIMO antenna for UWB applications based on the super-formula A comparative study up to 1024 bit Euclid's GCD algorithm FPGA implementation and synthesizing On-line measurement of biomass using colloid dielectric probe and open-ended cell. Determination of the aggregation threshold Classification of ECG signals of normal and abnormal subjects using common spatial pattern
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1