The Making of Korean Cultural·Aesthetic Discourse by Western Missionaries from the Late 19th Century to the First Half of the 20th Century

Young-Sam Yook
{"title":"The Making of Korean Cultural·Aesthetic Discourse by Western Missionaries from the Late 19th Century to the First Half of the 20th Century","authors":"Young-Sam Yook","doi":"10.29186/kjhh.2022.46.473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article intends to comprehend, reappraise, and criticize how Western missionaries had perceived and interpreted the origins, transformations, characteristics of Korean traditional literature, fine arts, and music by analyzing related articles and essays primarily published in The Korean Repository, The Korea Review, and Transactions of the Korea Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society from the late 19th Century to the First Half of the 20th Century. The author comes up with plausible and/or tentative conclusions as followings: First, Western missionaries contributed to building a solid foundation of Korean aesthetic discourse by drawing a periodization according to artistic achievement, selecting literary·artistic cannons, and classifying·cataloging major works/writers, thus stimulating the launch of the so-called “Choseon Studies Movement” by Korean intellectuals during Japanese colonial era. Second, many concerned Western missionaries agreed that Koreans managed to maintain its own authentic/original aesthetic tradition, distinguished from China and Japan. Third, Korean artistic tradition derives not from a singular but from plural origins and its own peculiarities are an outcome of a hybrid and transnational (re)production among Western missionaries, Japanese bureaucrat-scholars, and native Korean intellectuals.","PeriodicalId":104116,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society of the History of Historiography","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Society of the History of Historiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29186/kjhh.2022.46.473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article intends to comprehend, reappraise, and criticize how Western missionaries had perceived and interpreted the origins, transformations, characteristics of Korean traditional literature, fine arts, and music by analyzing related articles and essays primarily published in The Korean Repository, The Korea Review, and Transactions of the Korea Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society from the late 19th Century to the First Half of the 20th Century. The author comes up with plausible and/or tentative conclusions as followings: First, Western missionaries contributed to building a solid foundation of Korean aesthetic discourse by drawing a periodization according to artistic achievement, selecting literary·artistic cannons, and classifying·cataloging major works/writers, thus stimulating the launch of the so-called “Choseon Studies Movement” by Korean intellectuals during Japanese colonial era. Second, many concerned Western missionaries agreed that Koreans managed to maintain its own authentic/original aesthetic tradition, distinguished from China and Japan. Third, Korean artistic tradition derives not from a singular but from plural origins and its own peculiarities are an outcome of a hybrid and transnational (re)production among Western missionaries, Japanese bureaucrat-scholars, and native Korean intellectuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
19世纪末至20世纪上半叶西方传教士对韩国文化美学话语的塑造
本文通过分析19世纪末至20世纪上半叶英国皇家亚洲学会韩国分会的《韩国书库》、《韩国评论》、《汇刊》等相关文章和论文,对西方传教士对韩国传统文学、美术、音乐的起源、转变、特点的认识和解释进行了理解、重新评价和批判。作者认为,首先,西方传教士根据艺术成就划分时期,选择文学艺术大炮,对主要作品/作家进行分类,为奠定韩国美学话语的坚实基础做出了贡献,从而刺激了日本殖民时期韩国知识分子发起的所谓“朝鲜研究运动”。其次,许多有关的西方传教士一致认为,韩国人设法保持了自己的真实/原始的审美传统,与中国和日本不同。第三,韩国的艺术传统不是来自单一的,而是来自多元的起源,它自己的特点是西方传教士、日本官僚学者和韩国本土知识分子混合和跨国(再)生产的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Historical Review of Pinanhaengnok Joseonhwanyeoseungram’s Compilation and Its Meaning Historical Meaning of Rewitings of the Songshi 宋史 Based on an Analysis of “Liao Biography 遼傳” of the Eojeong Songsa jeon 御定宋史筌 : Joseon-type Sinocentrism in the Compilation of Chinese Historical Records Writing and Editing of Family Motto by Taekdang Yi Sik's Family in the 17th Century Mutual Aid and Resistance of Jewish Women under Nazi Germany: Focused on the Ravensbrück Concentration Camp
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1