Online Academic Dishonesty of College Students: A Review

Changsheng Chen, Jingyun Long, Junxiao Liu, Zongjun Wang, Lifeng Wang, Jing Zhang
{"title":"Online Academic Dishonesty of College Students: A Review","authors":"Changsheng Chen, Jingyun Long, Junxiao Liu, Zongjun Wang, Lifeng Wang, Jing Zhang","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.200723.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"e-Learning provides students with an open, free, and self-supervised scene, which has found a feasible path for lifelong education. The quality of online learning and the certification of achievements must be based on the real learning process. According to the existing literature, research on online academic dishonesty (OAD) is relatively rare. We need to advance future research based on the past experience on online academic dishonesty, and we also need to systematically sort out the research conclusions and possible development directions of this topic. In this paper, the author systematically combed the relevant literature on online academic dishonesty, covering most of the relevant papers as of the end of 2019. Most research on online academic fraud has the following characteristics: using questionnaires to obtain exploration conclusions, focusing on learners in a certain discipline or situation, lack of research on big data learning behavior sample data, and the formation mechanism of online academic dishonesty behavior needs to be further studied and elaboration. The research results show that online academic dishonesty is indeed widespread, and the factors that cause the dishonesty behavior come from many aspects such as personality, cognition, teaching, system, etc. In future research, it is necessary to identify online academic dishonesty in time and take comprehensive intervention measures to make integrity and moral culture in online environments.","PeriodicalId":280324,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Advanced Education, Management and Social Science (AEMSS2020)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Advanced Education, Management and Social Science (AEMSS2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200723.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

e-Learning provides students with an open, free, and self-supervised scene, which has found a feasible path for lifelong education. The quality of online learning and the certification of achievements must be based on the real learning process. According to the existing literature, research on online academic dishonesty (OAD) is relatively rare. We need to advance future research based on the past experience on online academic dishonesty, and we also need to systematically sort out the research conclusions and possible development directions of this topic. In this paper, the author systematically combed the relevant literature on online academic dishonesty, covering most of the relevant papers as of the end of 2019. Most research on online academic fraud has the following characteristics: using questionnaires to obtain exploration conclusions, focusing on learners in a certain discipline or situation, lack of research on big data learning behavior sample data, and the formation mechanism of online academic dishonesty behavior needs to be further studied and elaboration. The research results show that online academic dishonesty is indeed widespread, and the factors that cause the dishonesty behavior come from many aspects such as personality, cognition, teaching, system, etc. In future research, it is necessary to identify online academic dishonesty in time and take comprehensive intervention measures to make integrity and moral culture in online environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学生网络学术不诚信:述评
e-Learning为学生提供了一个开放、自由、自我监督的场景,为终身教育找到了一条可行的路径。在线学习的质量和成绩的认证必须以真实的学习过程为基础。根据现有文献,对网络学术不诚信的研究相对较少。我们需要在以往网络学术不诚信的经验基础上推进未来的研究,也需要系统梳理本课题的研究结论和可能的发展方向。本文系统梳理了网络学术不诚信的相关文献,涵盖了截至2019年底的大部分相关论文。大多数关于网络学术欺诈的研究具有以下特点:采用问卷调查的方式获得探索性结论,关注于某一学科或情境下的学习者,缺乏对大数据学习行为样本数据的研究,网络学术欺诈行为的形成机制有待进一步研究和阐述。研究结果表明,网络学术欺诈行为确实普遍存在,而导致网络学术欺诈行为的因素来自人格、认知、教学、制度等多方面。在未来的研究中,有必要及时发现网络学术不诚信行为,并采取综合干预措施,在网络环境中建立诚信和道德文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research on Process Model of Project Portfolio Management Online Academic Dishonesty of College Students: A Review How to Avoid Conceptualization and Formalization of Anti-corruption in Peking Opera On the Critical Thinking of the Undergraduates and the Cultivating Paths of the Universities in China The Application of Practical Project-Based Approach in Police English Teaching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1