A comparison of Mamdani and Sugeno fuzzy inference systems for evaluating the quality of experience of Hapto-Audio-Visual applications

A. Hamam, N. Georganas
{"title":"A comparison of Mamdani and Sugeno fuzzy inference systems for evaluating the quality of experience of Hapto-Audio-Visual applications","authors":"A. Hamam, N. Georganas","doi":"10.1109/HAVE.2008.4685304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Virtual reality applications which incorporate haptic devices to enrich userspsila sense of touch are increasing in number. Assessing the quality of experience (QoE) of these applications reflects the amount of overall satisfaction and benefit gained from the application plus it lays the foundation for ideal user-centric design in the future. In this paper we build on our QoE fuzzy logic model, previously simulated and tested, by comparing results from two different and well-established fuzzy systems: Mamdani and Sugeno. The results analytically demonstrate the essential differences between the two systems and the benefits of using either one in assessing the overall QoE.","PeriodicalId":113594,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio visual Environments and Games","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"134","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio visual Environments and Games","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HAVE.2008.4685304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 134

Abstract

Virtual reality applications which incorporate haptic devices to enrich userspsila sense of touch are increasing in number. Assessing the quality of experience (QoE) of these applications reflects the amount of overall satisfaction and benefit gained from the application plus it lays the foundation for ideal user-centric design in the future. In this paper we build on our QoE fuzzy logic model, previously simulated and tested, by comparing results from two different and well-established fuzzy systems: Mamdani and Sugeno. The results analytically demonstrate the essential differences between the two systems and the benefits of using either one in assessing the overall QoE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mamdani和Sugeno模糊推理系统在触觉-视听应用体验质量评价中的比较
结合触觉设备丰富用户触觉的虚拟现实应用越来越多。评估这些应用程序的体验质量(QoE)反映了从应用程序中获得的总体满意度和收益,并且为将来理想的以用户为中心的设计奠定了基础。在本文中,我们建立了我们的QoE模糊逻辑模型,之前通过比较两个不同的和成熟的模糊系统:Mamdani和Sugeno的结果进行了模拟和测试。分析结果显示了两种系统之间的本质差异,以及使用任何一种系统在评估总体QoE时的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of sensory substitution to simplify the mechanical design of a haptic wrist A comparison of Mamdani and Sugeno fuzzy inference systems for evaluating the quality of experience of Hapto-Audio-Visual applications An auxiliary area of interest management for synchronization and load regulation in zonal P2P MMOGs Evaluating geometrical properties of virtual shapes using interactive sonification Haptic and visual rendering of virtual bone surgery: A physically realistic voxel-based approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1